23.01.2016 Views

JANUARY

1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6

1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NEW ZEALAND<br />

management (e.g., cleaning), which accounts for less than one-third of home support funding, is income-tested.<br />

Personal care (e.g., showering) is provided free of charge. Home care services are all provided by<br />

nongovernment agencies.<br />

What are the key entities for health system governance?<br />

As the health system is primarily public, government-funded and -appointed entities dominate governance<br />

structures. Some, like the health and disability commissioner (whose function is to champion consumers’ rights<br />

in the health sector), sit at arm’s length from the central government. Others are “crown entities,” with their own<br />

boards, and are required to follow government policy through letters of expectation. Key national<br />

arrangements, all of which have a role in providing information to, and engaging with, the public, are:<br />

• the Ministry of Health, which has overall responsibility for the health and disability system. The ministry acts<br />

as the Minister of Health’s principal advisor on health policy and maintains a role as funder, monitor,<br />

purchaser, and regulator of health and disability services. While it sets capitation rates paid to GPs, it has<br />

no role in regulating patient copayments.<br />

• the National Health Board (NHB), which aims to improve the quality, safety, and sustainability of health care<br />

by actively engaging with clinicians and the wider health sector. The NHB provides advice to the health<br />

minister and the director-general of health on all of the aforementioned matters. It has two subcommittees:<br />

the Capital Investment Committee, which provides advice on matters relating to capital investment and<br />

infrastructure in the public health sector, in line with the government’s service planning direction; and<br />

the National Health IT Board, which provides advice on the implementation and use of IT systems across<br />

the sector.<br />

• NZ Health Partnerships, established in July 2015 to support DHBs in delivering shared services and reduce<br />

costs by identifying opportunities for savings in administrative, support, and procurement.<br />

• the Pharmaceutical Management Agency of New Zealand, which assesses the effectiveness of drugs,<br />

distributes prescribing guidelines, and determines inclusion of drugs on the national formulary (with relative<br />

cost-effectiveness being one of nine criteria for inclusion). In addition, certain medical devices have been<br />

added to its schedule (Gauld, 2014). As of late 2015, a new set of “factors for consideration” will be used<br />

to underpin decisions: need; health benefit; costs and savings; and suitability.<br />

• the Health Quality and Safety Commission, which ensures that New Zealanders receive the best health and<br />

disability care possible given available resources. It is also working toward what is known as the New<br />

Zealand “triple aim”—improved quality, safety, and experience of care; improved health and equity for all<br />

populations; and better value for public health system resources.<br />

• the National Health Committee (NHC), which advises government on priorities for new and existing health<br />

technologies. All new diagnostic and nonpharmaceutical treatment services and significant expansions<br />

of existing services are referred to the NHC for evaluation and advice. The committee also provides advice<br />

on what technologies are obsolete or no longer provide value for money.<br />

What are the major strategies to ensure quality of care?<br />

The aforementioned health and disability commissioner investigates patient complaints, reports directly<br />

to Parliament, and has been active in promoting quality and patient safety.<br />

DHBs are held formally accountable to government for delivering efficient, high-quality care in hospitals,<br />

as measured by the achievement of targets across a range of indicators. These include six “health targets,”<br />

published quarterly, that aim to stimulate competition among DHBs and are enforced by financial sanctions<br />

if not met. In addition, DHB performance with regard to waiting times, access to primary care, and mental<br />

health outcomes is publicly disclosed. Also publicly reported are data comparing the performance of PHOs,<br />

126<br />

The Commonwealth Fund

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!