JANUARY
1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6 1857_mossialos_intl_profiles_2015_v6
JAPAN incentives for providers to contain cost, although the correlation has not yet been formally evaluated. Episodebased payments are not used. Mental health care: Mental health care is provided in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings, with patients charged the standard 30 percent coinsurance (although there is reduced cost-sharing and other financial protections for patients in the community). Covered services include psychological tests and therapies, pharmaceuticals, and rehabilitative activities. Specialized mental clinics and hospitals exist, but services for depression, dementia, and other common conditions are integrated with primary care. Most psychiatric beds are in private hospitals owned by medical corporations (MHLW, 2014c). Long-term care and social supports: National compulsory long-term care insurance (LTCI), administered by the municipalities, covers those age 65 and older and some disabled people ages 40 to 64. It covers home care, respite care, domiciliary care, disability equipment, assistive devices, and home modification. Medical services are covered by the PHIS, as are palliative care and hospice care in hospitals and medical services provided in home palliative care, while nursing services are covered by LTCI. Long-term home care services can be considered a part of home hospice services as dying patients become eligible. Roughly half of long-term care financing comes through taxation and half through premiums. Citizens age 40 and over pay income-related premiums along with PHIS premiums. Employers pay the same premium as that of their employees. Premiums for those age 65 and older, also income-based (including pensions), and set by municipalities based on estimated expenditures, are paid only by the beneficiaries. A 10 percent coinsurance rate applies to all covered services, up to an income-related ceiling. There is additional copayment for bed and board in institutional care, but it is waived or reduced for those with low income (all costs for those with meanstested social assistance are paid from local and national tax revenue). Eligible people are entitled to use long-term services up to needs-based ceilings (called “care levels”) set by local LTCI boards, according to assessment of physical and mental conditions. People are not allowed to buy unlisted services or services from non-LTCI providers with the budget provided, but they can purchase such services with their own money. Care management—covered by LTCI and offered by public, not-for-profit, and for-profit providers—is available to help people arrange long-term care services. The majority of home care providers are private; 64 percent were for-profit, 35 percent not-for-profit, and 0.4 percent public in 2013 (MHLW, 2014a). While for-profits are not allowed to provide institutional care under LTCI, there are private nursing homes for which residents pay full costs (MHLW, 2013). Family care leave benefits (part of employment insurance) are paid for up to three months when employees take leave to care for their families. Additionally, more than half of the municipalities have established marginal financial supports, mostly limited to those with lower incomes, with their own financial capacities and legislations (Kwon, 2014). What are the key entities for health system governance? The Social Security Council, a statutory body within the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, is in charge of developing national strategies on quality, safety, and cost control, and sets guidelines for determining provider fees. Within the Ministry, the Central Social Insurance Medical Council defines the benefit package and fee schedule. National government and prefectures devise cost-control plans (described below). The Japan Council for Quality Health Care, a nonprofit organization, works to improve quality throughout the health system and develops clinical guidelines, although it does not have any regulatory power to penalize poorly performing providers. Specialist societies themselves also produce clinical guidelines. Technology assessment of pharmaceuticals and medical devices is conducted by the Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices Agency, a governmental regulatory agency. It also sets the Public Health Insurance Drug Price List, which is a list of pharmaceuticals and their prices covered by the PHIS (English Regulatory Information Task 110 The Commonwealth Fund
JAPAN Force: Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association 2012). The criteria for coverage include clinical effectiveness but not economic appraisal. Since 2012, the agency has been discussing the possible application of comparative cost-effectiveness studies in its decision-making (described below). Nonprofit organizations work toward public engagement and patient advocacy, and every prefecture establishes a health care council to discuss the local health care plan. Under the Medical Care Law, these councils must have members representing patients. The Japan Fair Trade Commission, an independent governmental administrative commission, promotes fair competition in health care as well as other sectors. What are the major strategies to ensure quality of care? By law, prefectures are responsible for making health care delivery “visions,” which include detailed plans on cancer, stroke, acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, psychiatric disease, pediatric, and home care, as well as emergency, prenatal, rural, and disaster medicine. These plans include structural, process, and outcome indicators, as well as strategies for effective and high-quality delivery. Prefectures promote collaboration between providers to achieve them, with or without subsidies as financial incentives. Waiting times are generally not monitored by government, although there is cause for concern in some clinical areas, such as palliative care. Although there are structural health care delivery regulations, relatively few apply to process and outcomes. Prefectures are in charge of the annual inspection of hospitals. Sanctions include reduced reimbursement rates if staffing per bed falls below a certain ratio. Hospital accreditation, on the other hand, is voluntary and undertaken largely as an improvement exercise; roughly one-third of hospitals are accredited by the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. However, there is no disclosure of names of hospitals that fail the accreditation process. The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare organizes and financially supports a voluntary benchmarking project, in which hospitals report quality indicators on their websites. In order to practice, physicians are required to obtain a license by passing a national exam, but they are not subject to revalidation. However, specialist societies have introduced revalidation for qualified specialists. Clinical audits are voluntary. Public reporting on performance has been discussed but is not yet implemented. Every prefecture has a medical safety support center for handling complaints and promoting safety. Since 2004, advanced academic and public hospitals have been required to report adverse events to the Japan Council for Quality Health Care. Disease and medical device registries have been developed on a voluntary basis, possibly to be used for quality improvement in the future. Surveys of hospital patients’ experiences are conducted every three years. What is being done to reduce disparities? Reducing health disparities between population groups has been a general goal since 2012. The two explicit targets are a reduction of disparities in healthy life expectancies between prefectures and an increase in the number of local government entities that make efforts to solve health disparity issues (MHLW, 2012b). There is another plan to reduce disparities among prefectures in cancer treatment delivery, with each prefecture setting treatment targets. Health variations between regions are regularly reported by government. Health variations between socioeconomic groups and variations in health care access are occasionally measured and reported by researchers, some of them funded by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. International Profiles of Health Care Systems, 2015 111
- Page 60 and 61: FRANCE VHI finances 13.8 percent of
- Page 62 and 63: FRANCE The average income of primar
- Page 64 and 65: FRANCE What are the key entities fo
- Page 66 and 67: FRANCE inequities in prevention rel
- Page 68 and 69: FRANCE Nolte, E., C. Knai, and M. M
- Page 70 and 71: GERMANY There were 42 substitutive
- Page 72 and 73: GERMANY The 16 state governments de
- Page 74 and 75: GERMANY management system, by the s
- Page 76 and 77: GERMANY What major innovations and
- Page 78 and 79: INDIA Private health insurance: The
- Page 80 and 81: INDIA provide after-hour care, reim
- Page 82 and 83: INDIA are provided by other ministr
- Page 84 and 85: INDIA How are costs contained? Ther
- Page 86 and 87: 86
- Page 88 and 89: ISRAEL Together, these two types of
- Page 90 and 91: ISRAEL Primary care physicians are
- Page 92 and 93: ISRAEL Organization of the Health S
- Page 94 and 95: ISRAEL • Using electronic health
- Page 96 and 97: 96
- Page 98 and 99: ITALY during hospitalization (Thoms
- Page 100 and 101: ITALY Some regions are promoting ca
- Page 102 and 103: ITALY Organization of the Health Sy
- Page 104 and 105: ITALY although the degree of evolut
- Page 106 and 107: ITALY The author would like to ackn
- Page 108 and 109: JAPAN What is covered? Services: Al
- Page 112 and 113: JAPAN Organization of the Health Sy
- Page 114 and 115: JAPAN The author would like to ackn
- Page 116 and 117: THE NETHERLANDS receive faster acce
- Page 118 and 119: THE NETHERLANDS Hospital payment ra
- Page 120 and 121: THE NETHERLANDS Organization of the
- Page 122 and 123: THE NETHERLANDS References Organisa
- Page 124 and 125: NEW ZEALAND provided in GP clinics.
- Page 126 and 127: NEW ZEALAND management (e.g., clean
- Page 128 and 129: NEW ZEALAND including such informat
- Page 130 and 131: NEW ZEALAND largely through efficie
- Page 132 and 133: 132
- Page 134 and 135: NORWAY Primary, preventive, and nur
- Page 136 and 137: NORWAY Patients are free to choose
- Page 138 and 139: NORWAY What are the major strategie
- Page 140 and 141: NORWAY The National System for the
- Page 142 and 143: 142
- Page 144 and 145: SINGAPORE Medifund is the governmen
- Page 146 and 147: SINGAPORE Public hospital funding i
- Page 148 and 149: SINGAPORE Public consultation: The
- Page 150 and 151: SINGAPORE To keep demand for servic
- Page 152 and 153: 152
- Page 154 and 155: SWEDEN What is covered? Services: T
- Page 156 and 157: SWEDEN Hospitals: There are seven u
- Page 158 and 159: SWEDEN Care, which promotes use of
JAPAN<br />
incentives for providers to contain cost, although the correlation has not yet been formally evaluated. Episodebased<br />
payments are not used.<br />
Mental health care: Mental health care is provided in outpatient, inpatient, and home care settings, with<br />
patients charged the standard 30 percent coinsurance (although there is reduced cost-sharing and other<br />
financial protections for patients in the community). Covered services include psychological tests and therapies,<br />
pharmaceuticals, and rehabilitative activities. Specialized mental clinics and hospitals exist, but services for<br />
depression, dementia, and other common conditions are integrated with primary care. Most psychiatric beds<br />
are in private hospitals owned by medical corporations (MHLW, 2014c).<br />
Long-term care and social supports: National compulsory long-term care insurance (LTCI), administered by the<br />
municipalities, covers those age 65 and older and some disabled people ages 40 to 64. It covers home care,<br />
respite care, domiciliary care, disability equipment, assistive devices, and home modification. Medical services<br />
are covered by the PHIS, as are palliative care and hospice care in hospitals and medical services provided in<br />
home palliative care, while nursing services are covered by LTCI. Long-term home care services can be<br />
considered a part of home hospice services as dying patients become eligible.<br />
Roughly half of long-term care financing comes through taxation and half through premiums. Citizens age 40<br />
and over pay income-related premiums along with PHIS premiums. Employers pay the same premium as that<br />
of their employees. Premiums for those age 65 and older, also income-based (including pensions), and set by<br />
municipalities based on estimated expenditures, are paid only by the beneficiaries. A 10 percent coinsurance<br />
rate applies to all covered services, up to an income-related ceiling. There is additional copayment for bed and<br />
board in institutional care, but it is waived or reduced for those with low income (all costs for those with meanstested<br />
social assistance are paid from local and national tax revenue).<br />
Eligible people are entitled to use long-term services up to needs-based ceilings (called “care levels”) set by<br />
local LTCI boards, according to assessment of physical and mental conditions. People are not allowed to buy<br />
unlisted services or services from non-LTCI providers with the budget provided, but they can purchase such<br />
services with their own money. Care management—covered by LTCI and offered by public, not-for-profit, and<br />
for-profit providers—is available to help people arrange long-term care services.<br />
The majority of home care providers are private; 64 percent were for-profit, 35 percent not-for-profit, and 0.4<br />
percent public in 2013 (MHLW, 2014a). While for-profits are not allowed to provide institutional care under LTCI,<br />
there are private nursing homes for which residents pay full costs (MHLW, 2013).<br />
Family care leave benefits (part of employment insurance) are paid for up to three months when employees take<br />
leave to care for their families. Additionally, more than half of the municipalities have established marginal<br />
financial supports, mostly limited to those with lower incomes, with their own financial capacities and<br />
legislations (Kwon, 2014).<br />
What are the key entities for health system governance?<br />
The Social Security Council, a statutory body within the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, is in charge of<br />
developing national strategies on quality, safety, and cost control, and sets guidelines for determining provider<br />
fees. Within the Ministry, the Central Social Insurance Medical Council defines the benefit package and fee<br />
schedule. National government and prefectures devise cost-control plans (described below).<br />
The Japan Council for Quality Health Care, a nonprofit organization, works to improve quality throughout the<br />
health system and develops clinical guidelines, although it does not have any regulatory power to penalize<br />
poorly performing providers. Specialist societies themselves also produce clinical guidelines.<br />
Technology assessment of pharmaceuticals and medical devices is conducted by the Pharmaceutical and<br />
Medical Devices Agency, a governmental regulatory agency. It also sets the Public Health Insurance Drug Price<br />
List, which is a list of pharmaceuticals and their prices covered by the PHIS (English Regulatory Information Task<br />
110<br />
The Commonwealth Fund