Promoting Non-motorised Transport in Asian Cities
Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation conducted a study to assess the viability of promoting non-motorised transport in Asian cities. As part of the study, they undertook a project – Nehru Place Placemaking. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/promoting-non-motorised-transport-asian-cities-policymakers-toolbox/ Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation conducted a study to assess the viability of promoting non-motorised transport in Asian cities. As part of the study, they undertook a project – Nehru Place Placemaking. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/promoting-non-motorised-transport-asian-cities-policymakers-toolbox/
Parameter 6: Amenities Description: The availability of pedestrian amenities such as benches, street lights, public toilets and trees. These amenities greatly enhance the attractiveness and convenience of the pedestrian environment and in turn, the city itself. Rating Guide: Rating Description Example 1 No Amenities 2 Little Amenities at some locations 3 Limited number of provisions for pedestrians 4 Pedestrians provided some good amenities for major length 5 Pedestrians have excellent amenities such as lighting, cover from sun and rain making walking a pleasant experience 38
Parameter 7: Disability Infrastructure Description: The availability, positioning and maintenance of infrastructure for the disabled. Rating Guide: Rating Description Example 1 No infrastructure for disabled people is available 2 Limited infrastructure for disabled persons is available, but is not in usable condition. 3 Infrastructure for disabled persons is present but in poor condition and not well placed 4 Infrastructure for disabled persons is present, in good condition, but poorly placed. 5 Infrastructure for disabled persons is present, in good condition, and well placed. 39
- Page 1 and 2: Promoting Non-Motorized Transport i
- Page 3 and 4: Disclaimer : The views expressed in
- Page 5 and 6: 1. Motivations for Promoting NMT in
- Page 7 and 8: Figure 3: HCMC Metropolitan Region
- Page 9 and 10: A recent study conducted by the Wor
- Page 11 and 12: Figure 7: NMT Fatality Share of Roa
- Page 13 and 14: simple, differently painted, free-t
- Page 15 and 16: e conducted with relevant governmen
- Page 17 and 18: A good example for a comprehensive
- Page 19 and 20: for evaluation of and improvement o
- Page 21 and 22: considered as a sum of many streets
- Page 23 and 24: 7. Based on suggestions from female
- Page 25 and 26: 8. Comparison of Asian cyclability
- Page 27 and 28: 2.7 Guidelines and Policies: Comple
- Page 29 and 30: Footpath width to be increased at b
- Page 31 and 32: 10. To take up other related activi
- Page 33 and 34: No. Objectives Description 1 To res
- Page 35 and 36: of cycling or walking infrastructur
- Page 37 and 38: Annex B: Walkability Survey Guide P
- Page 39 and 40: Parameter 3: Availability of Crossi
- Page 41: Parameter 5: Motorist Behavior Desc
- Page 45 and 46: Parameter 9: Security from Crime De
- Page 47 and 48: Parameter 2: Availability of Cycle
- Page 49 and 50: Parameter 4: Lighting Description:
- Page 51 and 52: Parameter 6: Crossing points Descri
- Page 53 and 54: Parameter 8: Shaded lanes Descripti
- Page 55 and 56: Parameter 10: Traffic calming measu
- Page 57 and 58: Parameter 12: Signs, markings Descr
- Page 59 and 60: Parameter 14: Presence of service s
- Page 61 and 62: Parameter 16: Perception of securit
- Page 63 and 64: 4. When do you think you are most e
- Page 65 and 66: 4. How far will you walk to access
- Page 67 and 68: Bibliography [Online] // Walk Score
- Page 69: About Clean Air Asia www.cleanairas
Parameter 7: Disability Infrastructure<br />
Description: The availability, position<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
of <strong>in</strong>frastructure for the disabled.<br />
Rat<strong>in</strong>g Guide:<br />
Rat<strong>in</strong>g Description Example<br />
1 No <strong>in</strong>frastructure for disabled people is available<br />
2 Limited <strong>in</strong>frastructure for disabled persons is<br />
available, but is not <strong>in</strong> usable condition.<br />
3 Infrastructure for disabled persons is present but <strong>in</strong><br />
poor condition and not well placed<br />
4 Infrastructure for disabled persons is present, <strong>in</strong> good<br />
condition, but poorly placed.<br />
5 Infrastructure for disabled persons is present, <strong>in</strong> good<br />
condition, and well placed.<br />
39