18.01.2016 Views

Promoting Non-motorised Transport in Asian Cities

Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation conducted a study to assess the viability of promoting non-motorised transport in Asian cities. As part of the study, they undertook a project – Nehru Place Placemaking. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/promoting-non-motorised-transport-asian-cities-policymakers-toolbox/

Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation conducted a study to assess the viability of promoting non-motorised transport in Asian cities. As part of the study, they undertook a project – Nehru Place Placemaking. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/promoting-non-motorised-transport-asian-cities-policymakers-toolbox/

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Footpath width to be <strong>in</strong>creased at<br />

bus stops and recreational areas<br />

Suggest additional width based on<br />

landuse. for example - 3m at bus<br />

stops, commercial-mixed landuse -<br />

2.5m, high <strong>in</strong>tensity commercial area<br />

- 4m.<br />

Height of footpath to be above that<br />

of the carriageway, and supported<br />

by an un-mountable kerb.<br />

Height of the kerb at the edge<br />

should not exceed 150mm (height of<br />

standard public step riser)<br />

Mid-block pedestrian cross<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

should be provided when the<br />

distance between <strong>in</strong>tersections is a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>imum of 300m<br />

Mid-block cross<strong>in</strong>g spac<strong>in</strong>g varies<br />

with landuse and should match<br />

cross<strong>in</strong>g desire l<strong>in</strong>es. for example <strong>in</strong><br />

resedential areas it should be <strong>in</strong>between<br />

80-250m. In commercial and<br />

mixed landuse it is recommended to<br />

have 80-150m. In high <strong>in</strong>tensity commercial<br />

area it recommends complete<br />

pedestrianization if possible.<br />

Controlled mid-block cross<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

should be provided where peak hour<br />

volumes of pedestrians and vehicles<br />

are such that PV2 (cross<strong>in</strong>g pedestrians<br />

(P) multiplied by vehicles (V)) > 1<br />

million (for undivided carriageway)<br />

or 2 million (for divided carriageway);where<br />

the stream speed of<br />

traffic is greater than 65 km/h; and<br />

where the wait<strong>in</strong>g times for pedestrians/vehicles<br />

have become <strong>in</strong>ord<strong>in</strong>ately<br />

long<br />

Controlled cross<strong>in</strong>gs are recommended<br />

when peak hour volumes of<br />

pedestrians and vehicles are such that<br />

PV2 (cross<strong>in</strong>g pedestrians multiplied<br />

by vehicles) > 1 million (for undivided<br />

carriageway) or 2 million (for divided<br />

carriageway); where the approach<br />

speed of traffic is greater than 65<br />

km/h; and where the wait<strong>in</strong>g times<br />

for pedestrians/vehicles have become<br />

<strong>in</strong>ord<strong>in</strong>ately long or accidents record<br />

suggests 5 or more accidents.<br />

Table 5: India Design Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Pedestrians<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!