Promoting Non-motorised Transport in Asian Cities
Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation conducted a study to assess the viability of promoting non-motorised transport in Asian cities. As part of the study, they undertook a project – Nehru Place Placemaking. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/promoting-non-motorised-transport-asian-cities-policymakers-toolbox/
Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation conducted a study to assess the viability of promoting non-motorised transport in Asian cities. As part of the study, they undertook a project – Nehru Place Placemaking. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/promoting-non-motorised-transport-asian-cities-policymakers-toolbox/
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Footpath width to be <strong>in</strong>creased at<br />
bus stops and recreational areas<br />
Suggest additional width based on<br />
landuse. for example - 3m at bus<br />
stops, commercial-mixed landuse -<br />
2.5m, high <strong>in</strong>tensity commercial area<br />
- 4m.<br />
Height of footpath to be above that<br />
of the carriageway, and supported<br />
by an un-mountable kerb.<br />
Height of the kerb at the edge<br />
should not exceed 150mm (height of<br />
standard public step riser)<br />
Mid-block pedestrian cross<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
should be provided when the<br />
distance between <strong>in</strong>tersections is a<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imum of 300m<br />
Mid-block cross<strong>in</strong>g spac<strong>in</strong>g varies<br />
with landuse and should match<br />
cross<strong>in</strong>g desire l<strong>in</strong>es. for example <strong>in</strong><br />
resedential areas it should be <strong>in</strong>between<br />
80-250m. In commercial and<br />
mixed landuse it is recommended to<br />
have 80-150m. In high <strong>in</strong>tensity commercial<br />
area it recommends complete<br />
pedestrianization if possible.<br />
Controlled mid-block cross<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
should be provided where peak hour<br />
volumes of pedestrians and vehicles<br />
are such that PV2 (cross<strong>in</strong>g pedestrians<br />
(P) multiplied by vehicles (V)) > 1<br />
million (for undivided carriageway)<br />
or 2 million (for divided carriageway);where<br />
the stream speed of<br />
traffic is greater than 65 km/h; and<br />
where the wait<strong>in</strong>g times for pedestrians/vehicles<br />
have become <strong>in</strong>ord<strong>in</strong>ately<br />
long<br />
Controlled cross<strong>in</strong>gs are recommended<br />
when peak hour volumes of<br />
pedestrians and vehicles are such that<br />
PV2 (cross<strong>in</strong>g pedestrians multiplied<br />
by vehicles) > 1 million (for undivided<br />
carriageway) or 2 million (for divided<br />
carriageway); where the approach<br />
speed of traffic is greater than 65<br />
km/h; and where the wait<strong>in</strong>g times<br />
for pedestrians/vehicles have become<br />
<strong>in</strong>ord<strong>in</strong>ately long or accidents record<br />
suggests 5 or more accidents.<br />
Table 5: India Design Guidel<strong>in</strong>es for Pedestrians<br />
25