18.01.2016 Views

Promoting Non-motorised Transport in Asian Cities

Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation conducted a study to assess the viability of promoting non-motorised transport in Asian cities. As part of the study, they undertook a project – Nehru Place Placemaking. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/promoting-non-motorised-transport-asian-cities-policymakers-toolbox/

Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation conducted a study to assess the viability of promoting non-motorised transport in Asian cities. As part of the study, they undertook a project – Nehru Place Placemaking. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/promoting-non-motorised-transport-asian-cities-policymakers-toolbox/

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Pedestrian cross<strong>in</strong>gs would <strong>in</strong>clude<br />

• Remov<strong>in</strong>g the slight drop (25 mm) from the<br />

footpath to the road and provid<strong>in</strong>g tactile to<br />

<strong>in</strong>dicate the edge of the road for the visually<br />

impaired<br />

• Thicken<strong>in</strong>g road cross<strong>in</strong>g l<strong>in</strong>es to guide the<br />

visually impaired to walk with<strong>in</strong> the designated<br />

cross<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

• Install<strong>in</strong>g vibrat<strong>in</strong>g push button (with audio<br />

alert) at traffic signal posts to help the visually<br />

impaired<br />

• Provid<strong>in</strong>g at grade road level cross<strong>in</strong>gs where<br />

traffic conditions permit<br />

5. In Hong Kong, the provision of pedestrian facilities<br />

and the prioritization of pedestrians have both<br />

been <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong> the determ<strong>in</strong>ation of the scale,<br />

location and site requirements of various land uses<br />

and facilities. The Hong Kong Plann<strong>in</strong>g Standards<br />

and Guidel<strong>in</strong>es provide guidance on how pedestrian<br />

facilities should be <strong>in</strong>tegrated <strong>in</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g structures,<br />

such as <strong>in</strong>dustrial estates, science parks, shopp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

areas, public transport facilities and <strong>in</strong>terchanges,<br />

ferry term<strong>in</strong>als and even roads and highways.<br />

These also provide specific guidel<strong>in</strong>es on how to<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>e the streets suitable for pedestrianization.<br />

The guidel<strong>in</strong>es for cycl<strong>in</strong>g, vehicle park<strong>in</strong>g and for<br />

general urban design are centered on pedestrians.<br />

Design codes should match the transport policy and<br />

protect and prioritize vulnerable sectors of society <strong>in</strong><br />

the transport system. The India pedestrian design code<br />

developed <strong>in</strong> 1988 was revised recently to prioritize<br />

pedestrian movement and to be consistent with the<br />

national Urban <strong>Transport</strong> Policy (see table below).<br />

Old Code (IRC103-1988) Common Practice New Revised Code IRC 103-2012<br />

Footpaths should have a m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

width of 1.5m on both sides. The LOS<br />

(Level of Service) concept dictates the<br />

maximum width. The result of such a<br />

school of thought is that pedestrians<br />

are provided only a m<strong>in</strong>ority share of<br />

space (most often less than 10% of<br />

road space) and <strong>in</strong> many <strong>in</strong>stances no<br />

space at all.<br />

A m<strong>in</strong>imum of 1.8m (width) by 2.2m<br />

(height) walk<strong>in</strong>g zone should be<br />

clear of all obstructions. A m<strong>in</strong>imum<br />

width of 1.8m for roads of right<br />

of way of 10m and 1.5m for roads<br />

with right of way less than 10m. LOS<br />

dictates maximum width (LOSB) is<br />

recommended.<br />

Dead (unused) width of 0.5m and<br />

1m to be added to sidewalks runn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

alongside houses and commercial<br />

areas.<br />

An additional dead width to be<br />

added based on landuse stipulations<br />

(as mentioned below). For resedential<br />

area it is 0.5m, commercial area<br />

is 1m.<br />

For example a footpath <strong>in</strong> busy<br />

commercial area would have 4+1m =<br />

5m width.<br />

24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!