Population, territory and sustainable development

7
Table IX.4 Panama: number of cities by population category, 1950-2010 ........................... 152
Table IX.5 Ecuador: number of cities by population category, 1950-2010 .......................... 153
Table IX.6 Latin America (14 countries) (1,439 cities with more than 20,000 inhabitants,
by population size): total net migration (absolute and relative) with the rest
of the urban system and the rest of the system of cities ...................................... 154
Table IX.7 Latin America (9 countries) (917 cities with more than 20,000 inhabitants,
by population size): total net migration and with the rest of the urban system
(total and percentage positive net migration), censuses from the 1990s ............. 159
Table IX.8 Latin America (14 countries) (1,439 cities with more than 20,000 inhabitants,
by population size): net total migration and with the rest of the
urban system (total and percentage positive net migration),
censuses from the 2000s ...................................................................................... 160
Table IX.9 Latin America (3 countries): metropolitan cities by total net migration,
close and distant (absolute balances), censuses from the 2000 onwards ............ 161
Table IX.10 Latin America and the Caribbean (14 countries): simple correlation matrix
between total net internal migration, with other cities and with the rest
of the system of human settlements, and socioeconomic indicators
(employment, education, and living conditions) ................................................. 166
Table IX.11 Latin America and the Caribbean (14 countries): linear regressions
by country for socioeconomic variables and total net and intra-urban
system migration intensity, significant coefficients ............................................ 167
Table X.1 Latin America and the Caribbean: percentages of global total,
rural and urban population .................................................................................. 169
Table X.2 Latin America: evolution of the relative weight of the population
of the metropolitan MADs or capital cities in the national
population, 1950-2000 ........................................................................................ 171
Table X.3 Latin America: evolution of the relative weight of the population
of the metropolitan MADs or capital cities in the total urban
population of the country, 1950-2000 ................................................................. 172
Table X.4 Latin America and the Caribbean: concentration of the population
in large cities ....................................................................................................... 173
Table X.5 Latin America: population and growth rate of cities with 1 million
to 4 million inhabitants, by number of cities, 1950-2000 ................................... 174
Figures
Figure IV.1 Rural population, by major world regions, 1950-2050 ....................................... 27
Figure IV.2 Latin America and the Caribbean: total rural population, 1950-2015 ................ 28
Figure IV.3 Latin America: growth rate of the rural population during the intercensal
period 1990-2000 and percentage of the population living
in urban areas, 2000 census ................................................................................. 32
Figure IV.4 Density/economic-activity gradient, 2000 census round .................................... 44
Figure IV.5 Latin America and the Caribbean (15 countries): distribution of rural
employment among the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors ........................ 50
Figure IV.6 Latin America: poor and indigent rural population, around 2000 and 2010 ....... 59
Figure IV.7 Poverty in rural households, by typology............................................................ 60
Figure IV.8 Typology of rural economies, on the basis of percentages of employment
in agriculture and poverty rate by household ...................................................... 60
Figure IV.9 Poverty in rural households by ethnic status ....................................................... 63