08.01.2016 Views

Population, territory and sustainable development

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of current trends, contexts and issues in the spheres of population, territory and sustainable development and examine their public policy implications. Three themes run through the report. The first two are laid out in the empirical chapters (III through X); the third is taken up in the closing chapter. Using the most recent data available (including censuses conducted in the 2010s), the first theme describes and tracks location and spatial mobility patterns for the population of Latin America, focusing on certain kinds of territory. The second explores the linkages between these patterns and sustainable development in different kinds of territory in Latin America and the Caribbean. The third offers considerations and policy proposals for fostering a consistent, synergistic relationship between population location and spatial mobility, on the one hand, and sustainable development, on the other, in the kinds of territory studied.

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of current trends, contexts and issues in the spheres of population, territory and sustainable development and examine their public policy implications. Three themes run through the report. The first two are laid out in the empirical chapters (III through X); the third is taken up in the closing chapter. Using the most recent data available (including censuses conducted in the 2010s), the first theme describes and tracks location and spatial mobility patterns for the population of Latin America, focusing on certain kinds of territory. The second explores the linkages between these patterns and sustainable development in different kinds of territory in Latin America and the Caribbean. The third offers considerations and policy proposals for fostering a consistent, synergistic relationship between population location and spatial mobility, on the one hand, and sustainable development, on the other, in the kinds of territory studied.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

73<br />

Chapter V<br />

THE SETTLEMENT OF SPARSELY POPULATED AREAS IN LATIN AMERICA<br />

A. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND<br />

A glance at the map of Latin America shows a very uneven settlement pattern, with densely populated<br />

areas mostly on or near the coasts <strong>and</strong> huge swathes of sparsely populated areas, both at the heart of South<br />

America (the Amazon rainforest, which spans several national borders, <strong>and</strong> the Chaco region in Paraguay)<br />

<strong>and</strong> in the far south (Patagonia). Throughout the region there are other low-population-density areas that<br />

share one defining characteristic: extreme environmental conditions. These include deserts, for example,<br />

in the north of Mexico <strong>and</strong> the Atacama Desert in Chile, rainforest <strong>and</strong> marshl<strong>and</strong>, such as the Darien Gap<br />

which lies across southern Panama <strong>and</strong> the northern tip of Colombia, <strong>and</strong> ice fields in the Aysén <strong>and</strong><br />

Magallanes regions of Chile.<br />

Disparities in terms of population density started to even out in the second half of the twentieth<br />

century, as shown in maps V.1 <strong>and</strong> V.2. This did not happen by chance, but was rather the result of<br />

economic incentives <strong>and</strong> deliberate action taken to attract settlers to areas of low population density,<br />

which were also mistermed “empty spaces”. This chapter presents a brief account of the process of<br />

deliberate settlement of sparsely populated areas.<br />

Between 1950 <strong>and</strong> 1970, public policy in the region typically promoted productive <strong>development</strong>,<br />

territorial, economic <strong>and</strong> social integration, <strong>and</strong> demographic consolidation (that is, settlement) of<br />

sparsely populated regions. These objectives <strong>and</strong> policies actually predated those two decades, with “to<br />

govern is to populate” 1 <strong>and</strong> similar philosophies being long established. However, it was Brazil’s decision<br />

in the 1950s to change its capital from Rio de Janeiro to an entirely new location, to be built from scratch<br />

<strong>and</strong> named Brasilia, chosen precisely because it was unpopulated, close to the demographic frontier <strong>and</strong><br />

far from the historical centres of economic, political <strong>and</strong> social power, that led countries to embark upon<br />

initiatives promoting the <strong>development</strong> <strong>and</strong> settlement of sparsely populated areas that were considered of<br />

strategic value.<br />

The idea of settling low-population-density areas, particularly in the Amazon, was already<br />

familiar in Brazil, but now it became a pillar of the national construct, first through <strong>development</strong>alist<br />

projects, then through nationalist agendas. This objective lost favour both as a subject of political<br />

discourse <strong>and</strong> as a focus of policies <strong>and</strong> programmes, however, with the return of democracy in the 1980s,<br />

as will be discussed later in this chapter. Nevertheless, recent studies show that people, organizations,<br />

companies <strong>and</strong> even the State continue to gravitate towards the Amazon region (see box V.1).<br />

1<br />

The dictum of Juan Bautista Alberdi in the mid-nineteenth century in Argentina was, precisely, “En América,<br />

gobernar es poblar” (In America, to govern is to populate), specifically by encouraging immigration from<br />

Europe. See Alberdi (n/d).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!