Population, territory and sustainable development

More documents

Info

223 Pendall, R., R. Puentes and J. Martin (2006), From Traditional to Reformed: a Review of Land Use Regulations in the Nation’s 50 Largest Metropolitan Areas, Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution/Metropolitan Policy Program/Research Brief. Perego, Luis (2003), “Competitividad a partir de los agrupamientos industriales. Un modelo integrado y replicable de clusters productivos” [online] http:// www.eumed.net/cursecon/libreria/lhp/ index.htm. Pérez, E. (2004), “El mundo rural latinoamericano y la nueva ruralidad”, Nómadas, No. 20, Bogota, Universidad Central. Pérez–Alemán, Paola (1998), Institutional Transformations and Economic Development: Learning, Inter–firm Networks and the State in Chile, New York, Columbia University. Pérez-Campuzano, Enrique (2011), “Segregación socioespacial urbana. Debates contemporáneos e implicaciones para la ciudades mexicanas”, Estudios demográficos y urbanos, vol. 26. No. 77. Perlman, J.E. (1977), 0 mito da marginalidade, Rio de Janeiro, Paz e Terra. Pinto da Cunha, J.M. and J. Rodríguez (2009), “Crecimiento urbano y movilidad en América Latina”, Revista latinoamericana de población (RELAP), No. 4-5. Polèse, Mario (1998), Economía urbana y regional. Introducción a la relación entre territorio y desarrollo, Cartago, Libro Universitario Regional. Polèse, M. and R. Stren (2000), The Social Sustainability of Cities, Toronto, University of Toronto Press. Porter, Michael (1991), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Free Press. Primi, A. (2002), “The costs of distance: rural poverty through a territorial perspective”, Master's thesis, University of Pavia. Prost, B. (1991), “Du rural au peri-urbain: conflit de territoire et requalification de l’espace”, Revue de géographie de Lyon, vol. 66, No. 2. Ramírez, J.C., I. Silva and L.M. Cuervo (2009), “Economía y territorio: desigualdades y políticas”, Libros de la CEPAL, No. 99 (LC/G.2385-P), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). United Nations publication, Sales No. S.09.II.G.16. Ramos, Joseph (1999), “Una estrategia de desarrollo a partir de los complejos productivos (clusters) en torno a los recursos naturales ¿una estrategia prometedora?”, Santiago, Chile, unpublished. (1998), “A development strategy founded on natural resource-based production clusters”, CEPAL Review, No. 66 (LC/R.17443/Rev.1), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Rangel, M. (2011), “Pobreza rural y los programas de transferencias condicionadas en América Latina y El Caribe”, Documento de trabajo, No. 3, Proyecto conocimiento y cambio en pobreza rural y desarrollo, Santiago, Chile, Latin American Center for Rural Development (RIMISP). Ribeiro de Oliveira, A., L. Ervatti and C. O`Neill, (2011), “O panorama dos deslocamentos populacionais no Brasil: PNADs e Censos Demográficos”, Reflexões sobre os Deslocamentos Populacionais no Brasil, Estudos e Análises Informação Demográfica e Socioeconômica, No. 1, Rio de Janeiro. Ribeiro, L., J. Rodrigues and F. Corrêa (2010), “Segregação residencial e emprego nos grandes espaços urbanos brasileiros”, Cadernos Metrópole, No. 23, São Paulo. Riffo, L. (2011), “Desigualdades económicas regionales en América Latina y el Caribe”, paper presented at the Expert Group Meeting on Population, Territory and Sustainable Development, Santiago, Chile, 16-17 August. Rigotti, José Irineu and Jarvis Campos (2009), “Movimentos populacionais e as cidades médias de Minas Gerais”, paper presented at the VI National Conference on Migration, Belo Horizonte, 12-14 August [online] www.abep.nepo.unicamp.br/docs/anais/outros/6EncNacSobreMigracoes/ST4/ Irineu.pdf . Roberts, B. and R. Wilson (eds.) (2009), Urban Segregation and Governance in the Americas, New York, Palgrave-Macmillan.
224 Rodrigues, Fabíola (2011), “Os novos desafios da urbanização brasileira: uma avaliação do direito à cidade na década de 2000”, Revista latinoamericana de población (RELAP), year 5, No. 8, January-June. Rodríguez, A. and J. Meneses (2011), “Transformaciones rurales en América Latina y sus relaciones con la población rural”, paper presented at the Expert Group Meeting on Population, Territory and Sustainable Development, Santiago, Chile, 16-17 August. (2010), “Condiciones socioeconómicas y laborales de los hogares rurales en doce países de América Latina”, paper presented at the 48th Congress of the Brazilian Society of Rural Economics, Management and Sociology (SOBER), Campo Grande, 25-28 July. Rodríguez, A. and D. Murillo (2008), “Caracterización rural – urbana de los distritos y cantones de Costa Rica”, Lo rural es diverso, evidencia para el caso de Costa Rica, A. Rodríguez and M. Saborío (eds.), San José, Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA). Rodríguez, A. and E. Oviedo (2001), “Gestión urbana y gobierno de áreas metropolitanas”, Medio ambiente y desarrollo series, No. 34 (LC/L1534-P), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). Rodríguez, A. and M. Saborío (eds.) (2008), Lo rural es diverso: Evidencia para el caso de Costa Rica, San José, Inter-American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA). Rodríguez, J. (2011a), “Migración interna en ciudades de América Latina: Efectos en la estructura demográfica y la segregación residencial”, Notas de población, No. 93 (LC/G.2509-P), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). United Nations publication, Sales No. S.11.II.G.58. (2011b), “Migración interna y sistema de ciudades en América Latina: intensidad, patrones, efectos y potenciales determinantes, censos de la década de 2000”, Población y desarrollo series, No. 105, Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2009), “Dinámica demográfica y asuntos urbanos y metropolitanos prioritarios en América Latina: ¿qué aporta el procesamiento de microdatos censales?”, Notas de población, No. 86 (LC/G.2349-P), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2008) “Spatial distribution, internal migration and development in Latin America and the Caribbean”, CEPAL Review, No. 96 (LC/G.2396-P), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2004), “Migración interna en América Latina y el Caribe: Estudio regional del período 1980– 2000”, Población y desarrollo series, No. 50 (LC/L.2059–P), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). United Nations publication, Sales No. S.04.II.G.3. (2002), “Distribución espacial de la población de América Latina y el Caribe: Tendencias, interpretaciones y desafíos para las políticas públicas”, Población y desarrollo series, No. 32 (LC/L.1831–P), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). United Nations publication, Sales No. S.02.II.G.137. Rodríguez, J. and M. da Cunha (2009), “Urban growth and mobility in Latin America”, Demographic Transformations and Inequalities in Latin America. Historical trends and recent patterns, Suzana Cavenaghi (org.), Investigaciones series, No. 8, Rio de Janeiro, Latin American Population Association [online] www.alapop.org/docs/publicaciones/investigaciones/Demog Transformations.pdf. Rodríguez, J. and G. Busso (2009), “Migración interna y desarrollo en América Latina entre 1980 y 2005, Un estudio comparativo con perspectiva regional basado en siete países”, Libros de la CEPAL, No. 102 (LC/G.2397–P), Santiago, Chile, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). United Nations publication, Sales No. S.09.II.G.14.
Page 3 and 4:
Alicia Bárcena Executive Secretary
Page 5 and 6:
4 Chapter VII Regional inequalities
Page 7 and 8:
6 Table V.3 Latin America (9 countr
Page 9 and 10:
8 Figure IV.10 Latin America (selec
Page 11 and 12:
10 Map VII.5 Plurinational State of
Page 13 and 14:
12 This document is therefore divid
Page 16 and 17:
15 Chapter II CONCEPTS, DEFINITIONS
Page 18 and 19:
17 which guarantee comparability. C
Page 20 and 21:
19 social inclusion, with improveme
Page 22:
21 The above description is clearly
Page 25 and 26:
24 Table III.1 LATIN AMERICA AND TH
Page 27 and 28:
26 Table III.3 LATIN AMERICA (19 CO
Page 29 and 30:
28 While the rural population of La
Page 31 and 32:
30 Box IV.1 (concluded) In addition
Page 33 and 34:
32 As a result of the absolute and
Page 35 and 36:
34 The sustained decline in the rur
Page 37 and 38:
36 Country Table IV.2 LATIN AMERICA
Page 39 and 40:
38 Country Table IV.5 LATIN AMERICA
Page 41 and 42:
40 Box IV.3 THE AGEING OF THE RURAL
Page 43 and 44:
42 Rodríguez and Meneses (2011) co
Page 45 and 46:
44 The classification outlined in t
Page 47 and 48:
46 An analysis of the results obtai
Page 49 and 50:
48 Although the inhabitants of some
Page 51 and 52:
50 Non-agricultural employment has
Page 53 and 54:
52 C. PRODUCTION PATTERNS AND THE R
Page 55 and 56:
54 Box IV.5 IMPACTS OF SOYBEAN PROD
Page 57 and 58:
56 A recent study entitled Inserci
Page 59 and 60:
58 Table IV.11 LATIN AMERICA: POOR
Page 61 and 62:
60 Figure IV.7 POVERTY IN RURAL HOU
Page 63 and 64:
62 Box IV.6 (concluded) These and o
Page 65 and 66:
64 combine a number of factors of w
Page 67 and 68:
66 Figure IV.10 LATIN AMERICA (SELE
Page 69 and 70:
68 The data in figure IV.11 also sh
Page 71 and 72:
70 Figure IV.12 LATIN AMERICA: AVER
Page 73 and 74:
72 Box IV.8 ADOLESCENT FERTILITY IN
Page 75 and 76:
74 Map V.1 SOUTH AMERICA: POPULATIO
Page 77 and 78:
76 Prime examples of this include t
Page 79 and 80:
78 Table V.2 LATIN AMERICA (9 COUNT
Page 81 and 82:
80 creation of tax-free zones, the
Page 83 and 84:
82 Box V.2 (concluded) State polici
Page 85 and 86:
84 In any case, only once the infor
Page 87 and 88:
86 It is not possible to draw direc
Page 89 and 90:
88 studies was conducted recently b
Page 91 and 92:
90 C. THE POLITICAL CONTEXT AND MOB
Page 94 and 95:
93 Chapter VII REGIONAL INEQUALITIE
Page 96 and 97:
95 Map VII.2 LATIN AMERICA AND THE
Page 98 and 99:
97 Some of these programmes were su
Page 100 and 101:
99 D. TERRITORIAL EQUITY, REGIONAL
Page 102 and 103:
101 Map VII.3 CHILE: CLASSIFICATION
Page 104 and 105:
103 In Mexico, most of the chronica
Page 106 and 107:
105 Figure VII.3 ECUADOR: POVERTY R
Page 108 and 109:
107 However, internal migration can
Page 110 and 111:
109 Table VII.5 LATIN AMERICA (SELE
Page 112 and 113:
111 Table VII.7 PERU (SIERRA DEPART
Page 114 and 115:
113 Lastly, in the case of Ecuador,
Page 116 and 117:
115 Chapter VIII SUSTAINED URBANIZA
Page 118 and 119:
117 This chapter presents the most
Page 120 and 121:
119 Busso, 2009; and ECLAC-UN-HABIT
Page 122 and 123:
121 estimate of the urban populatio
Page 124 and 125:
123 Figure VIII.2 LATIN AMERICA AND
Page 126 and 127:
125 First, the region’s economy i
Page 128 and 129:
127 urbanized; the rural population
Page 130 and 131:
129 rural areas. According to the s
Page 132 and 133:
131 the absence of a strategic visi
Page 134 and 135:
133 The need to design ad hoc inter
Page 136 and 137:
135 settlements with low-income pop
Page 138 and 139:
137 Figure VIII.4 LATIN AMERICA AND
Page 140:
139 At the same time, decentralizat
Page 143 and 144:
142 The rest of the system of citie
Page 145 and 146:
144 Table IX.1 LATIN AMERICA: NUMBE
Page 147 and 148:
146 First is the demographic scope
Page 149 and 150:
148 Basing the same series on towns
Page 151 and 152:
150 Table IX.2 LATIN AMERICA: PROSP
Page 153 and 154:
152 The data emerging from 2010 cen
Page 155 and 156:
154 City size Table IX.6 LATIN AMER
Page 157 and 158:
156 Figure IX.5 LATIN AMERICA (1,73
Page 159 and 160:
158 For unemployment, the picture i
Page 161 and 162:
160 rate differential among the dif
Page 163 and 164:
162 individuals valued cultural fac
Page 165 and 166:
164 that draw migrants, due precise
Page 167 and 168:
166 Table IX.10 LATIN AMERICA AND T
Page 170 and 171:
169 Chapter X TRENDS, MUTATIONS AND
Page 172 and 173:
171 Table X.2 LATIN AMERICA: EVOLUT
Page 174 and 175: 173 1. Demographic evolution of lar
Page 176 and 177: 175 As table X.4 shows, during the
Page 178 and 179: 177 comparison. But the most convin
Page 180 and 181: 179 in recent years, which are desc
Page 182 and 183: 181 Map X.2 MEXICO: INTERCENSAL GRO
Page 184 and 185: 183 irregular settlements known as
Page 186 and 187: 185 The third argument is based on
Page 188 and 189: 187 Map X.4 MEXICO CITY: EXTENDED M
Page 190 and 191: 189 more general social inequalitie
Page 192: 191 5. Concluding remarks: the grea
Page 195 and 196: 194 In view of lower internal migra
Page 197 and 198: 196 familiarity with surroundings a
Page 199 and 200: 198 connections; (ii) identify the
Page 201 and 202: 200 The report casts light on an is
Page 203 and 204: 202 Box XI.3 PROTECTING THE ECOSYST
Page 205 and 206: 204 In view of the above, the prima
Page 207 and 208: 206 overlap of functions and alloca
Page 209 and 210: 208 Many of the programmes develope
Page 211 and 212: 210 A breakdown of net migration by
Page 213 and 214: 212 Box XI.8 (concluded) Case studi
Page 216 and 217: 215 Bibliography Abba, Artemio Pedr
Page 218 and 219: 217 Cecchini, S. and A. Madariaga (
Page 220 and 221: 219 (2010a), Time for equality: clo
Page 222 and 223: 221 Hiebert, Daniel and David Ley (
Page 226 and 227: 225 Rodríguez, J. and M. Villa (19
show all

Population, territory and sustainable development

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?