08.01.2016 Views

Population, territory and sustainable development

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of current trends, contexts and issues in the spheres of population, territory and sustainable development and examine their public policy implications. Three themes run through the report. The first two are laid out in the empirical chapters (III through X); the third is taken up in the closing chapter. Using the most recent data available (including censuses conducted in the 2010s), the first theme describes and tracks location and spatial mobility patterns for the population of Latin America, focusing on certain kinds of territory. The second explores the linkages between these patterns and sustainable development in different kinds of territory in Latin America and the Caribbean. The third offers considerations and policy proposals for fostering a consistent, synergistic relationship between population location and spatial mobility, on the one hand, and sustainable development, on the other, in the kinds of territory studied.

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of current trends, contexts and issues in the spheres of population, territory and sustainable development and examine their public policy implications. Three themes run through the report. The first two are laid out in the empirical chapters (III through X); the third is taken up in the closing chapter. Using the most recent data available (including censuses conducted in the 2010s), the first theme describes and tracks location and spatial mobility patterns for the population of Latin America, focusing on certain kinds of territory. The second explores the linkages between these patterns and sustainable development in different kinds of territory in Latin America and the Caribbean. The third offers considerations and policy proposals for fostering a consistent, synergistic relationship between population location and spatial mobility, on the one hand, and sustainable development, on the other, in the kinds of territory studied.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

185<br />

The third argument is based on a fait accompli: the conviction that peri-urban settlements are<br />

irreversible in the short <strong>and</strong> medium term <strong>and</strong> that policies should take the dual approach of discouraging<br />

<strong>and</strong> preventing poor urban sprawl while also seeking to address the existing needs of peri-urban<br />

communities. This two-pronged approach has economic as well as political costs. Specifically, it creates<br />

expectations of urbanization <strong>and</strong> regularization among potential newcomers to the urban periphery,<br />

whether “squatters” or individuals who resort to the informal market. However, to deny people access to<br />

basic services <strong>and</strong> refuse them the right to reside in the city just because they live on the informal<br />

periphery is unacceptable, while maintaining a division between the formal city <strong>and</strong> informal city,<br />

between the centre <strong>and</strong> the periphery, is politically <strong>and</strong> socioeconomically un<strong>sustainable</strong> (Aguilar <strong>and</strong><br />

Escanilla, 2011; Torres, 2008; UNFPA, 2007; Clivchensky, 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2002).<br />

The fourth argument is a defense of the advantages <strong>and</strong> strong points of informality <strong>and</strong> the<br />

periphery. This position has frequently been espoused by those who defend the informal sector as a<br />

strategic <strong>and</strong> lasting alternative for metropolitan economies, 8 but there are also specialists who recognize<br />

the appeal of informality in both the labour market <strong>and</strong> the residential sector. In the labour sector, there<br />

are studies that find a paradoxical preference for informality, whether based on an appreciation of its<br />

benefits, ignorance of other possible options or inability to make use of them. Linn (2010, p. 15) finds it<br />

very surprising that there is a widespread preference, borne out by Latin American survey data, for<br />

informal over formal sector employment, even though the former is generally less productive. In housing,<br />

informality has objective advantages not only in terms of purchase costs but also in terms of taxes, which<br />

informal residential units do not pay, <strong>and</strong> the free services, typically electricity, that are sometimes<br />

obtained through illegal connections to the city’s supply. 9 Furthermore, recent qualitative studies<br />

conducted as part of the Minha Casa, Minha Vida programme in Brazil have found in certain peri-urban<br />

areas an unanticipated appreciation of these pluses. 10<br />

In view of the foregoing, it makes no sense to adopt policies <strong>and</strong> programmes that exclude or<br />

impose penalties on peri-urban dwellers. On the contrary, the consolidation of areas on the periphery<br />

should be made a priority in all large cities because it is the only way of ending the vicious cycle of dual<br />

<strong>and</strong> divided cities. Of course, this can be coupled with policies to prevent further urban sprawl, but since<br />

dem<strong>and</strong> for housing will continue to rise over the next several years, 11 control measures should be<br />

accompanied by densification policies <strong>and</strong> programmes that, among other things, facilitate high-rise<br />

construction, the use of vacant lots <strong>and</strong> the renovation of housing located in city centres.<br />

8<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

The De Soto study (1986) is an emblematic example of this line of reasoning, as is its appreciation of the<br />

flexibility <strong>and</strong> entrepreneurial capacity of this sector <strong>and</strong> its proposal to grant property rights to this sector.<br />

This does not necessarily mean that informality has a lower individual cost in the long run, since it does have<br />

both direct <strong>and</strong> indirect costs. Conversely, the costs of formality should be considered in the design of residential<br />

formalization <strong>and</strong> regularization programmes, which very often fail because they did not consider the hardships<br />

that “regularized” families would face in covering these costs.<br />

See [online] http://www.observatoriodasmetropoles.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1713<br />

%3Aminha-casa-minha-vida-experiencias-de-autogestao-coletiva&lang=pt.<br />

The increase in the number of homes, the indicator used to calculate dem<strong>and</strong> for housing, is outpacing the<br />

increase in population due to a combination of factors, including demographic inertia, a decline in average<br />

family size <strong>and</strong> an increase in the divorce rate. It is also possible that large cities are seeing dem<strong>and</strong> for second<br />

homes among foreigners or people who live in other areas of the country.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!