08.01.2016 Views

Population, territory and sustainable development

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of current trends, contexts and issues in the spheres of population, territory and sustainable development and examine their public policy implications. Three themes run through the report. The first two are laid out in the empirical chapters (III through X); the third is taken up in the closing chapter. Using the most recent data available (including censuses conducted in the 2010s), the first theme describes and tracks location and spatial mobility patterns for the population of Latin America, focusing on certain kinds of territory. The second explores the linkages between these patterns and sustainable development in different kinds of territory in Latin America and the Caribbean. The third offers considerations and policy proposals for fostering a consistent, synergistic relationship between population location and spatial mobility, on the one hand, and sustainable development, on the other, in the kinds of territory studied.

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of current trends, contexts and issues in the spheres of population, territory and sustainable development and examine their public policy implications. Three themes run through the report. The first two are laid out in the empirical chapters (III through X); the third is taken up in the closing chapter. Using the most recent data available (including censuses conducted in the 2010s), the first theme describes and tracks location and spatial mobility patterns for the population of Latin America, focusing on certain kinds of territory. The second explores the linkages between these patterns and sustainable development in different kinds of territory in Latin America and the Caribbean. The third offers considerations and policy proposals for fostering a consistent, synergistic relationship between population location and spatial mobility, on the one hand, and sustainable development, on the other, in the kinds of territory studied.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

143<br />

Box IX.1 (concluded)<br />

The national structure is defined by territorial links through central places of varying hierarchy <strong>and</strong><br />

function. Nationally, six tiers reflect cities’ weight within the national urban system. The major cities of the states in<br />

the central area of the country are classified as follows:<br />

First tier (18,396,770 inhabitants): The metropolitan region of the Valley of Mexico (ZMCM), which produces<br />

around half the country’s manufactured goods <strong>and</strong> services (by value), is home to one quarter of the economically<br />

active population <strong>and</strong> receives much of the domestic migration flow. This systemic approach identifies the ZMVM<br />

as the centre dominating all other Mexican cities directly or indirectly through the principle of transitivity. No city<br />

falls outside the national urban system, since each one is subordinate to others.<br />

Second tier (9,032,800 inhabitants): Puebla-Tlaxcala falls within this tier, along with Monterrey <strong>and</strong> Guadalajara<br />

(Jalisco). These cities concentrate enormous economic power <strong>and</strong> are major service centres. This is clearly seen<br />

in their influence over cities in neighbouring states in this large region, where they complement Mexico City in<br />

some functions.<br />

Third tier (14,763,111 inhabitants): Cuernavaca-Jiutepec (Morelos) <strong>and</strong> Toluca-Lerma (state of Mexico <strong>and</strong><br />

Querétaro) fall within this tier, along with the cities of Saltillo-Ramos, Arizpe-Arteaga, Torreón-Gómez, Palacio-<br />

Lerdo, Tampico-Madero-Altamira, San Luis Potosí- Soledad de Graciano Sánchez, Chihuahua, Ciudad Juárez,<br />

Hermosillo, Tijuana, Culiacán, León, Morelia-Tarimbaro, Acapulco, Veracruz-Boca del Río-Alvarado, Mérida-<br />

Progreso <strong>and</strong> Oaxaca de Juárez. These cities show enormous capacity for integrating the surrounding areas, which<br />

are usually in the same state; their influence wanes as distance from their own city limits increases.<br />

Fourth tier (8,355,171 inhabitants): Pachuca (Hidalgo) is in this tier, as are Reynosa-Río Bravo, Nuevo Laredo,<br />

Durango, Ciudad Obregón, Mexicali, Los Mochis, Topolobampo, Mazatlán, Irapuato-Salamanca, Celaya,<br />

Aguascalientes-Jesús María, Tepic-Xalisco, Tuxtla-Gutiérrez, Xalapa-B<strong>and</strong>erillas-Coatepec, Coatzacoalcos,<br />

Villahermosa <strong>and</strong> Cancún.<br />

Fifth tier (5,973,507 inhabitants): This tier includes Cuautla (Morelos), Tulancingo (Hidalgo), Tlaxcala (Tlaxcala),<br />

Apizaco (Tlaxcala), Tehuacán (Puebla), <strong>and</strong> another 25 cities. These cities shape population centres <strong>and</strong> small<br />

regions in their own states <strong>and</strong> are distributed throughout the country.<br />

Sixth tier (5,973,507 inhabitants): This tier includes Atlixco (Puebla) <strong>and</strong> another 51 locations. This group’s small<br />

influence is limited to towns nearby.<br />

Source: L. Herrera, W. Pecht <strong>and</strong> F. Olivares, “Crecimiento urbano de América Latina: mapas y planos de ciudades”, serie E,<br />

No. 22, Santiago, Chile, Latin American Demographic Centre (CELADE), 1976; Secretariat of Social Development,<br />

Programa Nacional de Desarrollo Urbano y Ordenación del Territorio 2001-2006, Mexico City, 2001; G. Garza, “La<br />

urbanización metropolitana en México: Normatividad y características socioeconómicas”, Papeles de población, April-<br />

June, No. 052, Toluca, Autonomous University of the State of Mexico, April-June 2007 [online] http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/<br />

pdf/112/11205204.pdf.<br />

In nearly all of the countries in the region, urbanization has significantly increased the number of<br />

cities making up urban systems, establishing alternatives <strong>and</strong> counterweights to the main city. The<br />

growing number of cities can be seen in table IX.1, which refers to the period 1950-2000, <strong>and</strong> in maps<br />

IX.1 <strong>and</strong> IX.2. Table IX.1 shows that in Latin America one third of the population lives in large cities,<br />

two thirds in cities of 20,000 inhabitants or more, <strong>and</strong> almost 80% in urban areas. Thus, most of the<br />

region’s urban population lives in cities or towns with fewer than one million inhabitants.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!