08.01.2016 Views

Population, territory and sustainable development

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of current trends, contexts and issues in the spheres of population, territory and sustainable development and examine their public policy implications. Three themes run through the report. The first two are laid out in the empirical chapters (III through X); the third is taken up in the closing chapter. Using the most recent data available (including censuses conducted in the 2010s), the first theme describes and tracks location and spatial mobility patterns for the population of Latin America, focusing on certain kinds of territory. The second explores the linkages between these patterns and sustainable development in different kinds of territory in Latin America and the Caribbean. The third offers considerations and policy proposals for fostering a consistent, synergistic relationship between population location and spatial mobility, on the one hand, and sustainable development, on the other, in the kinds of territory studied.

The purpose of this document is to provide an overview of current trends, contexts and issues in the spheres of population, territory and sustainable development and examine their public policy implications. Three themes run through the report. The first two are laid out in the empirical chapters (III through X); the third is taken up in the closing chapter. Using the most recent data available (including censuses conducted in the 2010s), the first theme describes and tracks location and spatial mobility patterns for the population of Latin America, focusing on certain kinds of territory. The second explores the linkages between these patterns and sustainable development in different kinds of territory in Latin America and the Caribbean. The third offers considerations and policy proposals for fostering a consistent, synergistic relationship between population location and spatial mobility, on the one hand, and sustainable development, on the other, in the kinds of territory studied.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

134<br />

population have this service in their homes; in others (Argentina, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela,<br />

Brazil, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama <strong>and</strong> Peru) the share ranges from 80% to 89%. The<br />

lowest percentages of access to potable water are in the Dominican Republic <strong>and</strong> the Plurinational State<br />

of Bolivia, with under 50%. Access to sanitation is generally lower than for water <strong>and</strong> electricity: only<br />

two countries (Chile <strong>and</strong> Costa Rica) have a rate of over 95%; seven countries range between 70% <strong>and</strong><br />

89%. At the other extreme, just 46% of the urban population of Nicaragua has sanitation in their homes;<br />

in Paraguay the figure is 16% (see table VIII.9).<br />

Table VIII.9<br />

LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN (SELECTED COUNTRIES): INDICATORS FOR ACCESS<br />

TO BASIC SERVICES IN URBAN AREAS, CENSUS DATA FROM THE 2000s<br />

(Percentages)<br />

Country<br />

With<br />

access to<br />

potable water<br />

Proportion of the population<br />

With<br />

access to<br />

sanitation<br />

With<br />

access to<br />

electricity<br />

Living in<br />

houses made of<br />

conventional<br />

building<br />

materials<br />

Secure<br />

tenure<br />

index<br />

With<br />

access to<br />

potable water<br />

Proportion of households<br />

With<br />

sanitation<br />

available<br />

Connected<br />

to electric<br />

utility<br />

Argentina 87.9 74.7 97.8 97.8 65.6 90.1 78.1 98.0<br />

Bolivia (Plurinational<br />

State of) 48.8 58.7 90.3 99.2 33.9 49.1 60.2 89.5<br />

Brazil 88.8 54.0 98.4 … 48.8 90.2 56.4 98.7<br />

Chile 98.9 97.1 99.1 92.4 88.2 98.8 97.0 98.9<br />

Costa Rica 96.7 96.0 99.7 87.5 87.4 96.6 96.2 99.7<br />

Dominican Republic 46.2 70.3 98.9 95.9 47.7 45.7 70.4 98.6<br />

Ecuador 89.5 63.4 96.0 87.5 52.9 90.8 66.4 96.6<br />

El Salvador 87.5 70.9 95.4 91.8 1.3 88.2 73.0 95.4<br />

Guatemala 89.0 69.2 94.4 79.3 55.2 89.5 72.0 95.1<br />

Honduras 50.6 72.7 92.2 95.6 63.9 51.2 74.2 92.6<br />

Mexico 91.7 77.7 98.1 91.2 66.3 92.2 78.8 98.2<br />

Nicaragua 62.7 42.8 93.0 88.2 2.5 63.2 44.0 92.8<br />

Panama 79.1 68.9 97.5 97.9 60.8 78.8 70.7 97.2<br />

Paraguay 54.8 16.2 97.4 99.2 10.9 55.5 17.2 97.2<br />

Peru 79.5 78.1 90.8 93.6 59.9 78.5 77.2 89.6<br />

Venezuela (Bolivarian<br />

Republic of) 89.3 89.7 97.9 91.7 74.3 90.3 90.9 98.9<br />

Source: Latin American <strong>and</strong> Caribbean Demographic Centre (CELADE) - <strong>Population</strong> Division of ECLAC, Spatial distribution <strong>and</strong><br />

urbanization in Latin America <strong>and</strong> the Caribbean (DEPUALC) database.<br />

These data are similar to the findings of 2006 <strong>and</strong> 2007 household surveys, which show that over<br />

80% of urban households have potable water <strong>and</strong> that the figure is over 90% in more than two thirds of<br />

the countries. As with the census data, the figures show that access to sanitation continues to be the<br />

weakest component of basic urban sanitation services: in some countries, less than a third of the urban<br />

population has access (Jordán <strong>and</strong> Martínez, 2009).<br />

These data suggest that in the majority of countries, access to basic services is high in urban<br />

areas, which points to the gradual resolution of a complex <strong>and</strong> crucial deficit that affects health, spending<br />

(one way or another, households have to gain access to these services, especially water, <strong>and</strong> they often<br />

pay a higher cost than under formal distribution) <strong>and</strong> the quality of life of people <strong>and</strong> households that do<br />

not have access to these services. But the findings also reveal that quantitative problems remain, either<br />

because the growth of the urban population in specific areas was not foreseen, because the basic<br />

infrastructure has deteriorated due to lack of maintenance or because certain areas (typically, informal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!