04.01.2016 Views

Harnessing Solar energy, Options for India

A study on harnessing solar energy options for India was conducted recently by Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation, Climate works Foundation and SSN foundation. Supporting this study it has been concluded that solar energy can play a big role in providing electricity to rural areas and thus has been included in India’s rural electrification policy. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/harnessing-solar-energy-options-for-india/

A study on harnessing solar energy options for India was conducted recently by Shakti Sustainable Energy Foundation, Climate works Foundation and SSN foundation. Supporting this study it has been concluded that solar energy can play a big role in providing electricity to rural areas and thus has been included in India’s rural electrification policy. See more at: http://shaktifoundation.in/report/harnessing-solar-energy-options-for-india/

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 6: Net Present Value of Outlay towards Phase 1 of the JNNSM<br />

2010 2011 2012 2013<br />

Annual installation 30 120 120 230<br />

Generation (million kWh) 53 210 210 403<br />

Price/W p 180 170 159 150<br />

Tariff/kWh 17.91 17.91 16.3 15.4<br />

Net present value of cash outlay<br />

of installations in that year<br />

(billion `)<br />

8.54 34.2 31.1 56.3<br />

NPV of Phase I (billion `) 108<br />

4.1.2. Off-grid Targets<br />

The mission targets 200 MW of off-grid solar PV installed capacity by 2013 and 2,000 MW by 2022.<br />

Given the lack of electrification and access to clean <strong>energy</strong> sources in <strong>India</strong>n villages coupled with<br />

T&D losses, decentralised distributed systems make very good sense. There<strong>for</strong>e, the targets set <strong>for</strong><br />

off-grid capacity could be bolder. A capital subsidy of `150 per W p is available <strong>for</strong> rural microgrids as<br />

against `90 per W p <strong>for</strong> other applications. The problem associated with the current capital subsidy is<br />

that the projects might not be self-sustainable and there is no incentive to continue operation of the<br />

microgrid plant once it is set up. Even if all the 200 MW was allocated to rural microgrids, the total<br />

subsidy would amount to only `30 billion (this outlay is expected from tax revenues). Even if the<br />

capacity is increased substantially (set aside <strong>for</strong> utility-scale PV), the total subsidy would work out to<br />

be still considerably less than the incentive offered <strong>for</strong> the utility scale.<br />

Just to demonstrate an alternate subsidy regime, a load of 35 kW, as worked out in the section on<br />

rural electrification, to meet the minimum electricity needs of a village of 150 households is<br />

considered. At this level, a 500 MW capacity can meet this minimum need of 14,290 villages. The<br />

total capital subsidy <strong>for</strong> this would be only `75 billion. If a generation-based tariff of `4.25 per kWh<br />

is added to this subsidy, the additional cost would be `32 billion. Hence, the total cost to providing<br />

minimum electrification to 14,290 villages will be in the same ballpark (Table 7) as the budget to pay<br />

investors <strong>for</strong> generation from 500 MW.<br />

<strong>India</strong>’s <strong>Solar</strong>-specific Policies CSTEP | Page 44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!