BEHAVIOR
o99s68z
o99s68z
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
EARLY CHILDHOOD DEVELOPMENT<br />
103<br />
respond contingently to the child’s ongoing activity,<br />
while expanding that activity to direct it in more challenging<br />
directions. Through incremental learning with<br />
emotional and cognitive support, scaffolding enables<br />
children to gradually develop the abilities necessary to<br />
solve tasks independently. Scaffolding can be strengthened<br />
through appropriate interventions, as the final<br />
section of this chapter will discuss.<br />
Since effective scaffolding frequently involves childdirected<br />
language, caregivers’ skill in using contingent,<br />
situation-specific linguistic guidance also plays<br />
a role in the development of children’s emerging selfregulatory<br />
abilities. Mothers who provided more positive<br />
verbal stimulation with their toddlers at age two<br />
had children who were better able to stay focused on a<br />
task and to delay gratification at age six, Olson, Bates,<br />
and Bayles (1990) found. Mothers who display a sensitive<br />
and scaffolding parenting style also have children<br />
who have lower cortisol levels and better executive<br />
function skills (Blair and others 2011). Thus the quality<br />
of parenting and verbal stimulation in infancy plays<br />
a critical role in shaping the child’s stress-response<br />
system and the development of critical noncognitive<br />
skills, as well as the development of language and cognitive<br />
skills more broadly.<br />
Parents’ beliefs and caregiving<br />
practices differ across groups,<br />
with consequences for children’s<br />
developmental outcomes<br />
How different parenting styles evolve and<br />
adapt differently to different economic<br />
contexts<br />
Many studies in the United States have found dramatic<br />
differences in caregiving behaviors among families.<br />
Parents with greater education and wealth tend<br />
to provide more cognitive and positive socioemotional<br />
stimulation for their infants than do parents with less<br />
education and fewer economic resources. Within SES<br />
groups, there is substantial variability as well. But how<br />
relevant are these findings to caregivers and children<br />
across the much broader range of contexts in developing<br />
countries?<br />
There has been little longitudinal research in developing<br />
countries that examines parenting behaviors in<br />
relation to well-defined child outcomes. On the question<br />
of how parenting practices differ across societies,<br />
however, ethnographers provide a rich literature of<br />
descriptive data. Many anthropological studies of<br />
mother-child interaction in agrarian societies report<br />
that parents are highly attentive to the safety and nutritional<br />
needs of infants, yet do not regularly engage in<br />
social interaction or direct speech with children who<br />
have not yet begun to talk (Kağıtçıbaşı 2007). For example,<br />
in rural villages in Kenya, Gusii mothers avoided<br />
eye contact with infants because of traditional beliefs<br />
that direct gaze can be dangerous; thus the mothers<br />
only rarely directed affectionate or social behaviors to<br />
their babies, Dixon and others (1981) observed. While<br />
Gusii mothers were quick to protect, comfort, and feed<br />
a crying infant, they tended to respond with touch and<br />
rarely with language. The use of contingent conversational<br />
communication strategies with young children,<br />
including the practices of verbal turn-taking and scaffolding,<br />
were not observed. As children grew older,<br />
parents spoke to them more often, but frequently used<br />
commands to direct the children to do something,<br />
rather than using language to elaborate on their children’s<br />
interests.<br />
How can such variation in parenting behaviors<br />
across different cultural groups be explained? The<br />
cultural psychologist Cigdem Kağıtçıbaşı (2007) provides<br />
functional explanations for cultural differences<br />
in parent-child relations by situating parental beliefs,<br />
values, and behaviors in their socioeconomic contexts.<br />
When a child is expected to make material contributions<br />
to the family, as in subsistence economies, then a utilitarian<br />
value can be attributed to the child. Thus parents’<br />
mental models of child rearing might be goal oriented,<br />
although not explicitly or consciously formulated<br />
in those terms. The child in a stable agrarian society<br />
whose future depends on mastering a traditional craft,<br />
such as weaving, could be socialized to develop that<br />
competence through nonverbal observation of adult<br />
weavers, with no need for extensive cognitive and language<br />
stimulation early in life. However, as Kağıtçıbaşı<br />
points out, “Teaching and learning limited to non-verbal<br />
observational learning and non-inductive obedienceoriented<br />
child socialization appear not to be optimal<br />
for the promotion of high levels of cognitive and linguistic<br />
competence in the child” (2007, 83). In fact, she<br />
argues that these traditional socialization goals may<br />
be disadvantageous in contexts of social change—for<br />
example, when uneducated parents must help their<br />
children prepare for formal education. To meet the new<br />
challenges of schooling, children need foundational<br />
skills in language and executive function to acquire<br />
the higher-order cognitive abilities that are critical to<br />
creative problem solving and success in school.<br />
How parenting practices compare across<br />
countries<br />
How do parenting practices differ across high-,<br />
middle-, and low-income countries? The association<br />
between two types of positive parenting practices—<br />
cognitive caregiving and socioemotional caregiving—<br />
and the country’s level of development, as measured