22.12.2015 Views

IQ-Magazine-Issue-14

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>IQ</strong> business overview<br />

BUSINESS<br />

OVERVIEW<br />

<strong>IQ</strong> <strong>Magazine</strong> discusses the effect that the<br />

new government has had on businesses in<br />

the months following the election…and<br />

how this will change in the coming years<br />

Now that we have fixed terms for Parliaments in the<br />

UK, the notion of a ‘snap’ election could well be<br />

a thing of the past. No longer are we likely to see<br />

a three-week scramble for votes, with all the issues<br />

glossed over quickly, leaving little room for debate.<br />

But not everyone is happy. Many say the general<br />

election campaign began with the party conferences<br />

held in the Autumn and continued, unabated<br />

almost, for going on eight months. And that, they<br />

felt, was too much.<br />

There was a lot to think about, though. People were<br />

expected to make a judgement on the first coalition<br />

government for more than 70 years. They had to<br />

make a judgement on a relatively untested leader of<br />

the opposition and decide whether he would make<br />

a competent Prime Minister. They had to decide<br />

whether they’d had enough of the present Prime<br />

Minister or whether they wanted him to keep the<br />

keys to Number 10.<br />

So that long campaign was enough, surely, to<br />

examine every minute detail of every policy that<br />

could possibly be suggested. Right? Well, not exactly.<br />

The economic indicators were all pointing in the<br />

right direction. Under the coalition, unemployment<br />

was falling and inflation had dropped to zero, even<br />

going into negative territory just before people<br />

headed for the ballot boxes. The economy was<br />

growing quite healthily and was regularly topping<br />

international comparison tables. If ever there was a<br />

reason to vote according to what’s in your wallet or<br />

your purse, this was the election which would prove<br />

that.<br />

Few pundits would have predicted a Conservative<br />

majority. Even fewer would have predicted the<br />

Labour Party’s rout. And nobody would have<br />

expected quite such a collapse of the Liberal<br />

Democrats to the point that they could arrive at<br />

issue <strong>14</strong> | page 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!