21.12.2015 Views

Watershed Achievements Report

wq-cwp8-18

wq-cwp8-18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Watershed</strong> Minnesota River <strong>Achievements</strong> Basin <strong>Report</strong> 2008<br />

<strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Achievements</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Statewide 2015<br />

Lower Minnesota River <strong>Watershed</strong><br />

Rush River <strong>Watershed</strong> TMDL<br />

Implementation Project for Fecal<br />

Coliform<br />

The Rush River <strong>Watershed</strong> TMDL Project for Fecal<br />

Coliform was not a complete success. During the course<br />

of the project there were four different coordinators and<br />

the project technician serving as interim coordinator<br />

during coordinator vacancies. This led to a lot of time<br />

being spent getting each new coordinator updated and<br />

other project concerns not getting looked at or finished.<br />

Two of the biggest problems facing the project<br />

concerning BMPs were the downturn of small and<br />

medium animal producers staying in animal agriculture<br />

and the tight parameters of the best management<br />

practices that were offered in the project plan. Larger<br />

animal producers were already following BMPs that<br />

were offered so they could retain their feedlot permits.<br />

Smaller and older producers were getting out of animal<br />

agriculture instead of upgrading. The Rush River<br />

<strong>Watershed</strong> TMDL Project for Fecal Coliform restricted<br />

most of the BMPs that were close and around feedlots<br />

and facilities. When the program was amended to include<br />

manure management in fields additional interest was<br />

shown in the practices. But with our cold, wet spring in<br />

2013 and 2014, not many practices were installed.<br />

Upgrading septic systems was the most successful BMP<br />

offered. Fifty MDA BMP loans were approved while<br />

the project was ongoing. Alternative tile intakes were<br />

another BMP that saw success. Thirty-one rock inlets were<br />

installed and five tile intakes were removed.<br />

The Rush River <strong>Watershed</strong> TMDL Project for Fecal<br />

Coliform sent $105,700.00 back to Minnesota Pollution<br />

Control Agency early, as it was evident that all the funds<br />

would not be spent. Because of the lack of BMPs put on<br />

the ground, $95,700.00 from Objective 1 was returned.<br />

Having four different coordinators during the project,<br />

Objective 5 would have unused funds from the grant so<br />

$10,000.00 was returned.<br />

Rush River watershed<br />

The Rush River <strong>Watershed</strong> (RRW) is a rural watershed that<br />

drains 257,770 acres (403 square miles) in Sibley, Nicollet<br />

and McLeod counties. The RRW comprises 22% of the<br />

total land area of the Lower Minnesota <strong>Watershed</strong>, a<br />

major watershed of the Minnesota River Basin. There are<br />

three branches to the Rush River: the north, middle and<br />

south branches. All three of these branches drain into the<br />

main stem of the river south of Henderson, Minnesota.<br />

The watershed contains a population of just over<br />

9,000 people (47% rural) and has four towns including<br />

Gaylord, Gibbon, Lafayette and Winthrop. The Rush River<br />

<strong>Watershed</strong>’s primary land use is agriculture, with 90% of<br />

the watershed acreage utilized for producing crops such<br />

as corn, soybeans, small grain and forage.<br />

The 2004 Rush River Assessment Project determined the<br />

water quality concerns of the Rush River <strong>Watershed</strong> to<br />

be fecal coliform (FC) bacteria, TSS, TP and NO2+NO3-N.<br />

The study also listed excessive stream flows and flooding<br />

as further water quality concerns for the watershed.<br />

Concurrently with this implementation project, a FC<br />

TMDL study was completed in partnership with the Water<br />

Resources Center at Minnesota State University, Mankato.<br />

The elevated levels of FC bacteria have resulted in the<br />

main stem and south branch of the Rush River being<br />

listed on the 303(d) Impaired Waters list.<br />

Goals<br />

• Make significant progress on achieving the Rush River<br />

TMDL for fecal coliform bacteria with a 30% reduction<br />

in the monthly fecal coliform geometric means from<br />

the FC TMDL Assessment Study.<br />

• Increase the adoption of BMPs that reduce FC bacteria<br />

levels in the Rush River.<br />

• Continue to foster watershed stewardship and<br />

community pride in clean water that achieves a legacy<br />

beyond this implementation grant.<br />

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency www.pca.state.mn.us 75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!