21.12.2015 Views

Watershed Achievements Report

wq-cwp8-18

wq-cwp8-18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Cedar River Basin <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Achievements</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2015<br />

Cedar River <strong>Watershed</strong><br />

Cedar River Alternative Ditch Designs<br />

Sediment and nutrient loading to the hypoxic zone of<br />

the Gulf of Mexico is well documented, and significant<br />

portions of the loading have been attributed to the<br />

upper Mississippi River basin resulting from extensive<br />

agricultural production acreage. Small streams and<br />

ditches provide the best opportunity to mitigate the<br />

high levels of nutrients from subsurface tile drainage.<br />

Drainage ditches are limited in their removal potential<br />

because they are relatively narrow and are periodically<br />

dug out for maintenance. Maintenance of drainage<br />

channels is expensive for landowners. Alternative designs<br />

to these ditches have the potential to ameliorate the<br />

environmental impact of drainage and to reduce the cost<br />

of maintaining them.<br />

Goals<br />

The project focused on evaluating alternative designs<br />

for agricultural drainage ditches that are of statewide<br />

interest. The work did improve the Mullenbach drainage<br />

ditch located in the Cedar River Basin.<br />

Five years of water quality and quantity data were<br />

analyzed, which included more than 100,000 continuous<br />

nitrate, flow, pH, conductivity, temperature and<br />

precipitation readings as well as more than 1,000 grab<br />

samples of other types of water quality variables. In<br />

addition, data were collected to evaluate the physical<br />

stability of the ditch and changes in the biological<br />

characteristics. Tools were developed to assess the<br />

feasibility of two-stage ditches using economics and<br />

physical conditions of the sites.<br />

Results that count<br />

Two-stage ditch was a successful alternative design. It<br />

improved the habitat for fish and, hence, improving their<br />

Fish index of biological integrity (IBI) scores. The number<br />

of pools and riffles increased from 5 to 65 and from 5<br />

to 68, respectively, from pre-construction to 2013. The<br />

design is stable with relatively moderate increase of 11%<br />

in bank width over the project duration. Denitrification<br />

rates were estimated to between 10% and 30%. More<br />

research is needed on the alternative design of rock inlet,<br />

seepage trenches and bench treatment systems.<br />

Financial information<br />

Funding type: Section 319<br />

Grant amount: $286,128<br />

Matching funds: $87,000<br />

Final in-kind: $148,904<br />

Contact information<br />

University of Minnesota<br />

Bruce Wilson, Professor<br />

1390 Eckles Avenue<br />

St. Paul, MN 55108<br />

612-625-6770<br />

wilson@umn.edu<br />

MPCA Project Manager: Charles Regan<br />

Two stage Mullenbach drainage ditch in Mower County, Minnesota<br />

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency www.pca.state.mn.us 48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!