Watershed Achievements Report
wq-cwp8-18
wq-cwp8-18
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Cedar River Basin <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Achievements</strong> <strong>Report</strong> 2015<br />
Cedar River <strong>Watershed</strong><br />
Cedar River Alternative Ditch Designs<br />
Sediment and nutrient loading to the hypoxic zone of<br />
the Gulf of Mexico is well documented, and significant<br />
portions of the loading have been attributed to the<br />
upper Mississippi River basin resulting from extensive<br />
agricultural production acreage. Small streams and<br />
ditches provide the best opportunity to mitigate the<br />
high levels of nutrients from subsurface tile drainage.<br />
Drainage ditches are limited in their removal potential<br />
because they are relatively narrow and are periodically<br />
dug out for maintenance. Maintenance of drainage<br />
channels is expensive for landowners. Alternative designs<br />
to these ditches have the potential to ameliorate the<br />
environmental impact of drainage and to reduce the cost<br />
of maintaining them.<br />
Goals<br />
The project focused on evaluating alternative designs<br />
for agricultural drainage ditches that are of statewide<br />
interest. The work did improve the Mullenbach drainage<br />
ditch located in the Cedar River Basin.<br />
Five years of water quality and quantity data were<br />
analyzed, which included more than 100,000 continuous<br />
nitrate, flow, pH, conductivity, temperature and<br />
precipitation readings as well as more than 1,000 grab<br />
samples of other types of water quality variables. In<br />
addition, data were collected to evaluate the physical<br />
stability of the ditch and changes in the biological<br />
characteristics. Tools were developed to assess the<br />
feasibility of two-stage ditches using economics and<br />
physical conditions of the sites.<br />
Results that count<br />
Two-stage ditch was a successful alternative design. It<br />
improved the habitat for fish and, hence, improving their<br />
Fish index of biological integrity (IBI) scores. The number<br />
of pools and riffles increased from 5 to 65 and from 5<br />
to 68, respectively, from pre-construction to 2013. The<br />
design is stable with relatively moderate increase of 11%<br />
in bank width over the project duration. Denitrification<br />
rates were estimated to between 10% and 30%. More<br />
research is needed on the alternative design of rock inlet,<br />
seepage trenches and bench treatment systems.<br />
Financial information<br />
Funding type: Section 319<br />
Grant amount: $286,128<br />
Matching funds: $87,000<br />
Final in-kind: $148,904<br />
Contact information<br />
University of Minnesota<br />
Bruce Wilson, Professor<br />
1390 Eckles Avenue<br />
St. Paul, MN 55108<br />
612-625-6770<br />
wilson@umn.edu<br />
MPCA Project Manager: Charles Regan<br />
Two stage Mullenbach drainage ditch in Mower County, Minnesota<br />
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency www.pca.state.mn.us 48