21.12.2015 Views

Watershed Achievements Report

wq-cwp8-18

wq-cwp8-18

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Minnesota <strong>Watershed</strong> Red St. Croix River River Basin River <strong>Achievements</strong> Basin Basin <strong>Report</strong> 2008<br />

<strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Achievements</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Statewide<br />

2015<br />

Snake River <strong>Watershed</strong><br />

St. Croix Basin Civic Governance<br />

Training and Civic Policy Pilot<br />

Project need: There is a significant amount of<br />

institutional infrastructure in our current water<br />

management system, but there is a lack of success in<br />

engaging the broad base of stakeholders needed to<br />

achieve water quality goals (households, farmsteads,<br />

businesses, congregations, non-profits, and government)<br />

It has become clear we need a new approach to water<br />

governance and policymaking that can be integrated<br />

into existing systems to increase the capacity to organize<br />

this broad base of necessary stakeholders in the interest<br />

of the common good. The role of “citizenship” is the<br />

common role we all share that obligates us to govern<br />

for the common good. Yet current management<br />

systems do not focus on developing this civic capacity<br />

and infrastructure. Instead the existing infrastructure<br />

has inadvertently caused fragmentation, inadequate<br />

coordination across sectors and organizations,<br />

competition for resources, resulting in increased<br />

cynicism. From the analysis of the need for a new<br />

approach to governance, questions were raised: What<br />

are the barriers within existing approaches to water quality<br />

planning, implementation and governance to achieving<br />

broad based ownership in addressing water quality? Can<br />

individuals within government address those barriers<br />

and institute approaches grounded in civic principles and<br />

standards for governance that would increase civic capacity<br />

and the civic infrastructure needed to impact the scale of the<br />

problem?<br />

Proposed Solution Strategy: Launched a Civic<br />

Governance pilot to test a civic organizing approach<br />

both inside (and between) several federal, state, and<br />

county government agencies that each play a watershed<br />

management role in the Snake River and Rum River<br />

watersheds. Pilot leaders were Kelly Osterdyk (Kanabec<br />

SWCD), Susan Shaw (Mille Lacs SWCD), and Shannon<br />

Carpenter (NRCS) supported by Lynne Kolze (MPCA) and<br />

Peg Michels (Civic Organizing Inc. and the Minnesota<br />

Active Citizenship Initiative).<br />

Goals<br />

The project focused on implementation issues, including:<br />

• Test capacity to organize a Civic Governance organizing<br />

agency (1-2) in the St. Croix Basin linked to existing<br />

civic organizing initiatives.<br />

• Produce a training model that would ensure<br />

investment in educational strategies supporting<br />

the capacity to organize and sustain the base of key<br />

stakeholders needed to address water quality.<br />

• Produce a Civic Governance Policy Agenda based upon<br />

outcomes from practice.<br />

Results that count<br />

• Achieved and exceeded work plan goals and<br />

objectives.<br />

• A core base of leaders (14) implementing water quality<br />

and environmental protection projects integrated<br />

civic organizing disciplines into their existing projects,<br />

have evidence that the approach shows promise<br />

for maximizing the resources already dedicated and<br />

expended in water quality implementation. This<br />

core base formed three civic organizing agencies (a<br />

permanent structure for civic leadership development)<br />

and worked together to learn from practice and<br />

advance findings across watersheds.<br />

• Developed a model for civic leadership development<br />

and a regional Civic Leadership Institute that includes<br />

a four hour Civic Governance Policy Workshop and<br />

provides the opportunity for leaders to take a six<br />

session Introduction to Civic Governance. The outcome<br />

from this training track provides the opportunity for<br />

leaders interested to develop and sustain a permanent<br />

regional civic organizing agency. At all points of this<br />

integrated educational track, individuals can chose to<br />

contribute to advancing Civic Governance in whatever<br />

way works for them. Members of the civic organizing<br />

agency take the lead on keeping the larger network in<br />

the loop on findings; sustain the integrated educational<br />

track; produce and track evidence based upon criteria<br />

for civic organizing; convene members across regions<br />

to expand impact; and govern the initiative. The key<br />

to achieving this outcome is the use of a common<br />

approach to organizing within each region.<br />

• A Civic Governance Case Study co-authored by the base<br />

of leaders that is based upon their practice. Case study<br />

is a work in progress and a method for organizing a<br />

broad base of feedback and ownership of results from<br />

practice.<br />

• A Civic Governance Policy Agenda developed through<br />

the process of civic organizing that produced specific<br />

policy recommendations through workshops,<br />

trainings, and practice by members of each regional<br />

civic organizing agency. Policy recommendations are<br />

Minnesota Pollution Control Agency www.pca.state.mn.us 103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!