Watershed Achievements Report
wq-cwp8-18
wq-cwp8-18
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Minnesota <strong>Watershed</strong> Red St. Croix River River Basin River <strong>Achievements</strong> Basin Basin <strong>Report</strong> 2008<br />
<strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Achievements</strong> <strong>Report</strong> Statewide<br />
2015<br />
Snake River <strong>Watershed</strong><br />
St. Croix Basin Civic Governance<br />
Training and Civic Policy Pilot<br />
Project need: There is a significant amount of<br />
institutional infrastructure in our current water<br />
management system, but there is a lack of success in<br />
engaging the broad base of stakeholders needed to<br />
achieve water quality goals (households, farmsteads,<br />
businesses, congregations, non-profits, and government)<br />
It has become clear we need a new approach to water<br />
governance and policymaking that can be integrated<br />
into existing systems to increase the capacity to organize<br />
this broad base of necessary stakeholders in the interest<br />
of the common good. The role of “citizenship” is the<br />
common role we all share that obligates us to govern<br />
for the common good. Yet current management<br />
systems do not focus on developing this civic capacity<br />
and infrastructure. Instead the existing infrastructure<br />
has inadvertently caused fragmentation, inadequate<br />
coordination across sectors and organizations,<br />
competition for resources, resulting in increased<br />
cynicism. From the analysis of the need for a new<br />
approach to governance, questions were raised: What<br />
are the barriers within existing approaches to water quality<br />
planning, implementation and governance to achieving<br />
broad based ownership in addressing water quality? Can<br />
individuals within government address those barriers<br />
and institute approaches grounded in civic principles and<br />
standards for governance that would increase civic capacity<br />
and the civic infrastructure needed to impact the scale of the<br />
problem?<br />
Proposed Solution Strategy: Launched a Civic<br />
Governance pilot to test a civic organizing approach<br />
both inside (and between) several federal, state, and<br />
county government agencies that each play a watershed<br />
management role in the Snake River and Rum River<br />
watersheds. Pilot leaders were Kelly Osterdyk (Kanabec<br />
SWCD), Susan Shaw (Mille Lacs SWCD), and Shannon<br />
Carpenter (NRCS) supported by Lynne Kolze (MPCA) and<br />
Peg Michels (Civic Organizing Inc. and the Minnesota<br />
Active Citizenship Initiative).<br />
Goals<br />
The project focused on implementation issues, including:<br />
• Test capacity to organize a Civic Governance organizing<br />
agency (1-2) in the St. Croix Basin linked to existing<br />
civic organizing initiatives.<br />
• Produce a training model that would ensure<br />
investment in educational strategies supporting<br />
the capacity to organize and sustain the base of key<br />
stakeholders needed to address water quality.<br />
• Produce a Civic Governance Policy Agenda based upon<br />
outcomes from practice.<br />
Results that count<br />
• Achieved and exceeded work plan goals and<br />
objectives.<br />
• A core base of leaders (14) implementing water quality<br />
and environmental protection projects integrated<br />
civic organizing disciplines into their existing projects,<br />
have evidence that the approach shows promise<br />
for maximizing the resources already dedicated and<br />
expended in water quality implementation. This<br />
core base formed three civic organizing agencies (a<br />
permanent structure for civic leadership development)<br />
and worked together to learn from practice and<br />
advance findings across watersheds.<br />
• Developed a model for civic leadership development<br />
and a regional Civic Leadership Institute that includes<br />
a four hour Civic Governance Policy Workshop and<br />
provides the opportunity for leaders to take a six<br />
session Introduction to Civic Governance. The outcome<br />
from this training track provides the opportunity for<br />
leaders interested to develop and sustain a permanent<br />
regional civic organizing agency. At all points of this<br />
integrated educational track, individuals can chose to<br />
contribute to advancing Civic Governance in whatever<br />
way works for them. Members of the civic organizing<br />
agency take the lead on keeping the larger network in<br />
the loop on findings; sustain the integrated educational<br />
track; produce and track evidence based upon criteria<br />
for civic organizing; convene members across regions<br />
to expand impact; and govern the initiative. The key<br />
to achieving this outcome is the use of a common<br />
approach to organizing within each region.<br />
• A Civic Governance Case Study co-authored by the base<br />
of leaders that is based upon their practice. Case study<br />
is a work in progress and a method for organizing a<br />
broad base of feedback and ownership of results from<br />
practice.<br />
• A Civic Governance Policy Agenda developed through<br />
the process of civic organizing that produced specific<br />
policy recommendations through workshops,<br />
trainings, and practice by members of each regional<br />
civic organizing agency. Policy recommendations are<br />
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency www.pca.state.mn.us 103