07.12.2012 Views

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TECTONIC AND NON-TECTONIC CAUSES<br />

<strong>OF</strong> EARLY HOLOCENE RELATIVE SEA<br />

LEVELCHANGEWITHINA<br />

TRANSGRESSIVE ESTUARY ON A<br />

SUBDUCTION MARGIN, PAKARAE RIVER,<br />

NORTH ISLAND, <strong>NEW</strong> ZEALAND.<br />

Kate Wilson 1 , Kelvin Berryman 2 , Tim Little 1 ,<br />

Ursula Cochran 2 & Nicola Litchfield 2 .<br />

1 Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600,<br />

Wellington.<br />

2 Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, PO<br />

Box 30368, Lower Hutt.<br />

(K.Wilson*gns.cri.nz)<br />

The highest Holocene marine terrace at Pakarae,<br />

North Island, New Zealand, corresponds with the<br />

maximum Holocene marine flooding surface. This<br />

terrace is underlain by a sequence of estuarine,<br />

fluvial and marine sediments that were deposited<br />

under rising eustatic sea level (SL) conditions.<br />

These sediments are presently exposed at elevations<br />

up to 20 m above modern mean SL as a result of<br />

tectonic uplift. This sedimentary sequence provides<br />

an opportunity to study the paleoenvironmental<br />

development of incised valleys under conditions of<br />

rising SL and tectonic uplift. The stratigraphy is<br />

valuable for comparison with traditional facies<br />

models of incised valley infills, which were<br />

developed exclusively from studies on stable<br />

coasts. We use sedimentology, macropaleontology<br />

and micropaleontology (benthic foraminifera) to<br />

reconstruct the paleoenvironments that<br />

accompanied infilling of Pakarae valley and to<br />

estimate the frequency, magnitude and timing of<br />

uplift events that occurred during the depositional<br />

period (c. 10,500 – c. 7,000 cal. yrs BP).<br />

We divide the Pakarae valley infill sequence into<br />

eight bio-lithofacies, each relates to a particular<br />

paleoenvironment. These are grouped into four<br />

paleoenvironmental facies: barrier, estuarine,<br />

estuary-head delta and fluvial. The basal fluvial<br />

facies, the immediately overlying estuary-head<br />

delta facies, and the capping barrier facies correlate<br />

well with models of incised valley infill from stable<br />

coasts and indicate that the complete sequence of<br />

valley infill is probably present within the Pakarae<br />

outcrops. However the middle section of the<br />

Pakarae stratigraphy displays alternations of<br />

estuarine and fluvial facies. This contrasts both<br />

with models of incised valley infill and with<br />

individual estuary infill studies; which predict that<br />

only central estuary basin sediments should be<br />

present between the transgressive estuary-head<br />

delta and the barrier facies.<br />

The whole Pakarae sequence is compressed relative<br />

to the amount of accommodation space estimated to<br />

have been created by eustatic SL rise during the<br />

depositional period. Only a small proportion of this<br />

can be explained by compaction, most of this<br />

important difference is the result of tectonic uplift<br />

during deposition. Supplemented by detailed<br />

microfossil studies and radiocarbon dates, we<br />

identify which facies transitions within the middle<br />

section are tectonic and non-tectonic in origin. One<br />

uplift event of at least 2 m occurred between 8695 –<br />

8376 cal. yrs B.P. One or two uplift events occurred<br />

after deposition of the Rotoma tephra at ~ 9500 cal.<br />

yrs B.P and before 9255 – 8990 cal. yrs. B.P. Our<br />

data extends the paleoseismic history of this<br />

important location which has one of the highest<br />

uplift rates along a subduction margin without an<br />

historical record of subduction earthquakes.<br />

ORAL<br />

IMPACTS <strong>OF</strong> TEPHRA FALL ON A DAIRY<br />

FARMING OPERATION AT<br />

REREWHAKAAITU, EASTERN TAUPO<br />

VOLCANIC ZONE, <strong>NEW</strong> ZEALAND<br />

T.M. Wilson 1 &J.W.Cole 1<br />

1 Natural Hazards Research Centre, Department of<br />

Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury,<br />

Christchurch, New Zealand<br />

(tmw42*student.canterbury.ac.nz)<br />

Much of New Zealand’s dairy farming industry,<br />

central to New Zealand’s economy, is based in the<br />

central North Island, in or near the Taupo Volcanic<br />

Zone, and is highly vulnerable to tephra fall.<br />

A vulnerability analysis was undertaken of,<br />

‘Tulachard’ a study farm at Rerewhakaaitu, eastern<br />

Taupo Volcanic Zone, to assess the susceptibility of<br />

dairy farm’s infrastructure and operational<br />

processes to tephra fall. ‘Tulachard’ was<br />

particularly appropriate as it is close to Tarawera<br />

Volcano. Power supply, water supply and ability to<br />

use the tractor were identified as the most<br />

vulnerable elements to ‘Tulachard’s’ ability to<br />

respond and recover from tephra fall. One of the<br />

most vulnerable components of a milking shed is<br />

the condenser used for cooling milk because of its<br />

exposed nature and requirement for circulating<br />

outside air. An air conditioning condenser, similar<br />

to condensers used in milk cooling systems, was<br />

laboratory tested where it performed moderately<br />

well when inundated with dry tephra, but rapidly<br />

failed with wet tephra.<br />

A telephone survey of the Rerewhakaaitu dairy<br />

farming community established their perceptions of<br />

the risks faced from volcanic hazards. Although all<br />

respondents were aware of volcanic hazards, over<br />

half did not believe their farm would be affected by<br />

a volcanic eruption in their lifetime. None had<br />

prepared for a future volcanic eruption. This has<br />

important education implications for key<br />

organisations that would be affected if dairy farms<br />

were affected by eruptions.<br />

50 th <strong>Kaikoura</strong>05 -95- <strong>Kaikoura</strong> <strong>2005</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!