07.12.2012 Views

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

REFLECTIONS ON DIP SLOPES AND<br />

LANDSLIDES IN NORTH-EAST<br />

MARLBOROUGH AND THE SOUTHERN<br />

ALPS<br />

Warwick M. Prebble<br />

Dept. of Geology, The University of Auckland,<br />

Private Bag 92019, Auckland.<br />

(w.prebble*auckland.ac.nz)<br />

Structure, tectonics and geomorphic expression are<br />

themes which run through the last 120 years of<br />

geologic exploration of the limestone dip slopes of<br />

north-east Marlborough. A complementary<br />

development is the gravity faulting model of<br />

topographic adjustment, which is based upon<br />

greywacke Mountains in Marlborough and the<br />

Southern Alps. This model has been perpetuated in<br />

landslide classifications and the geotechnical<br />

literature.<br />

The magnificent dip slopes and limestone gorges of<br />

the Chalk Range and Ben More anticline evoked<br />

eloquent and passionate comments from Alexander<br />

McKay in 1885 and Charles Cotton 70 years later.<br />

In the same year (1955) Harold Wellman<br />

recognised the Nidd Landslide in limestone and<br />

flint near Whernside ridge, parallel to the Chalk<br />

Range. Since then, closer examination of the dip<br />

slopes has revealed signs of widespread instability<br />

such as fracture dilation, ravines, debris flows and<br />

screes.<br />

Geotechnical mapping indicates that flexural<br />

toppling affects 30 of 34 discrete slope segments,<br />

the remainder being rock slides. Each failure is<br />

approximately 1 km 2 . Toppling is found down to<br />

70m deep in the cataclinal under-dip slopes in<br />

which the bedding and dominant fractures dip in<br />

the same direction as the slope but more steeply and<br />

in excess of 25 0 , the apparent friction angle. Where<br />

the bedding and fractures dip less than 25 0 there is<br />

an abrupt transition to parallel dip slopes, which<br />

develop rock slides on bedding parallel crush<br />

zones. Slope failure is absent where the limestone is<br />

not closely fractured and does not contain crush<br />

zones. Recent investigations show that the original<br />

model of uniform toppling proposed for the<br />

cataclinal slopes is a simplification. Zones of<br />

chaotic slope debris intercalated with coherent but<br />

disrupted rock mass suggest partial slope collapse<br />

in tandem with toppling. Non-uniform toppling<br />

across a slope, sideways twisting of toppled masses<br />

and sector collapse of topple complexes are features<br />

of current slope failure models.<br />

Further south in greywacke and schist some topple<br />

complexes are up to 20 km 2 in area and 2 km 3 in<br />

volume. Reverse scarps, ridge top depressions and<br />

ridge rents are linked to massive toppling of slopes,<br />

in some cases back to back. Multiple cracks, a few<br />

m wide, several tens of m long and at least a few<br />

tens of m deep testify to active spreading along the<br />

crests of ridges. The original gravity faulting<br />

mechanism of topographic adjustment proposed by<br />

Alan Beck in 1968 remains a current model in<br />

internationally accepted slope failure classification.<br />

Toppling may now be considered as an alternative<br />

mechanism and is arguably a better fit of the<br />

topographic features and structural details seen in<br />

these slopes. Toppling can also be seen as a<br />

mechanism for developing bending surfaces, which<br />

release rock slides, rock avalanches and debris<br />

flows. These slope failures feed copious quantities<br />

of sediment into streams and rivers. They start a<br />

chain of events, which transfers material from the<br />

mountains to the abyss.<br />

ORAL<br />

DECONVOLUTING MIXING,<br />

FRACTIONATION AND ASSIMILATION<br />

PROCESSES IN ANDESITES FROM<br />

RUAPEHU VOLCANO, <strong>NEW</strong> ZEALAND<br />

Richard Price 1 , John Gamble 2 ,<br />

Rhiannon George 3 ,IanSmith 4 & Craig Cook 5<br />

1 School of Science and Engineering, University of<br />

Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton.<br />

2 Department of Geology, National University<br />

Ireland, University College Cork, Ireland.<br />

3 GEMOC Key Centre, Macquarie University, North<br />

Ryde, Sydney, Australia.<br />

4 Department of Geology, University of Auckland,<br />

Auckland.<br />

5 Department of Earth Sciences, University of<br />

Waikato, Hamilton.<br />

(r.price*waikato.ac.nz)<br />

Andesites are now widely recognised as mixtures of<br />

crystals and melts that have experienced complex<br />

polybaric, polythermal events en route to their sites<br />

of eruption. Typical Ruapehu andesites are charged<br />

with a cargo of crystals, xenocrysts and xenoliths<br />

ranging in size from cm-scale to sub-microscopic,<br />

indicating that to varying extents the melts have<br />

interacted with and scavenged their surroundings<br />

and sources prior to eruption. Complex zoning<br />

patterns and melt and crystalline inclusions in the<br />

phenocryst/xenocryst populations attest to this<br />

complexity.<br />

Magma batches from relatively short-lived events<br />

(months /years) can show variation that can<br />

replicate almost the complete range of<br />

compositions erupted from Ruapehu over much<br />

longer (1-10 ka) time spans. High precision trace<br />

element and Pb-Sr-Nd isotopic information and<br />

new U-Th-Ra disequilibrium data show that it is<br />

possible to distinguish between Fractional<br />

Crystallisation (FC) and Assimilation with<br />

Fractional Crystallisation (AFC) processes in small<br />

melt batches. This has important and somewhat<br />

unexpected consequences for the interpretation of<br />

50 th <strong>Kaikoura</strong>05 -70- <strong>Kaikoura</strong> <strong>2005</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!