07.12.2012 Views

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EXPLORING CONSTRAINTS ON<br />

ANTIQUITY <strong>OF</strong> TERRESTRIAL LIFE IN<br />

<strong>NEW</strong> ZEALAND<br />

H.J. Campbell 1 &C.A.Landis 2<br />

1 GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New<br />

Zealand<br />

2 Department of Geology, University of Otago, PO<br />

Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand<br />

(h.campbell*gns.cri.nz)<br />

The New Zealand land surface appears to be less<br />

than 25 million years old.<br />

It therefore follows that the modern terrestrial biota<br />

is not descended from archaic ancestors residing on<br />

proto-New Zealand (Zealandia) when it broke away<br />

from Gondwana. Rather, it has evolved from<br />

accidental arrivals since New Zealand became<br />

emergent. For all that, the modern biota is indeed<br />

derived from lands of Gondwanan heritage.<br />

Our first statement is a bold assertion. It is based on<br />

systematic investigation of the geological evidence<br />

for ‘islands’ during latest Oligocene to earliest<br />

Miocene time. These ‘islands’ were first portrayed<br />

by Charles Fleming in 1959 and have subsequently<br />

become established in most treatments of New<br />

Zealand geological history and paleogeography<br />

since formation of the Geological Society 50 years<br />

ago.<br />

Our studies have shown that the geological<br />

evidence for the existence of islands during latest<br />

Oligocene to earliest Miocene time is either nonexistent<br />

or so wanting that we can confidently<br />

conclude that any islands that may have existed<br />

were small and short-lived. Here we critically<br />

evaluate four inferred mid-Cenozoic islands in:<br />

Fiordland, Central Otago, Northwest Nelson and<br />

central North Island.<br />

As part of this analysis, we have identified eight<br />

factors that appear to have influenced<br />

paleogeographic map reconstructions.<br />

This research has grown from exploration of<br />

regional planar surfaces in the New Zealand<br />

landscape and particularly the Waipounamu<br />

Erosion Surface as expressed in Otago and the<br />

Chatham Islands, and is supported by the ChEARS<br />

Marsden Project.<br />

All available geological evidence suggests that<br />

Zealandia broke away from Gondwana c. 85 Ma<br />

and then slowly sank 1,000 to 3,000 metres over a<br />

period of c. 60 million years, culminating in<br />

complete submergence c. 23 Ma (Waitakian).<br />

Shortly following this, plate boundary collision<br />

became vigorous resulting in tectonic emergence of<br />

New Zealand. This process is ongoing.<br />

ORAL<br />

UNCOVERING THE FACE <strong>OF</strong> THE<br />

EASTERN <strong>NEW</strong> ZEALAND MARGIN – A<br />

VIEW FROM THE OCEAN<br />

Lionel Carter 1 & Jarg Pettinga 2<br />

1 NIWA, Private Bag 14-901 Kilbirnie, Wellington,<br />

New Zealand<br />

2 University Canterbury, Private Bag 4800,<br />

Christchurch, New Zealand<br />

(l.carter*niwa.cri.nz)<br />

Our knowledge of New Zealand’s eastern margin,<br />

including the active Hikurangi and passive Bounty<br />

sectors, is surprisingly recent. Even though the<br />

broad outlines of these sectors were charted as early<br />

as 1910, it was not until 1958 that Hikurangi<br />

Trench and Bounty Trough were formally<br />

recognized. Being the pre-plate tectonic era, the<br />

forces behind these major oceanic forms were<br />

unclear. Hikurangi Trench was regarded as either a<br />

compressional or tensional feature, whereas Bounty<br />

Trough was seen as the consequence of large-scale<br />

uplift of the bordering Chatham Rise and Bounty<br />

Platform.<br />

Marine studies began in earnest in the mid-1960s.<br />

Systematic surveys were undertaken by the Navy<br />

and government research groups, but more<br />

significant was the oceanographic and geophysical<br />

transects run by the USNS Eltanin. This network of<br />

survey lines provided the first regional view of the<br />

eastern margin. Single channel seismic lines, in<br />

particular, highlighted the architecture of acoustic<br />

basement and sediment fill, as well as prominent<br />

morphological features. In Bounty Trough, the<br />

discovery of a canyon-channel system hinted at the<br />

long-distance transfer of South Island sediment to<br />

the deep ocean via turbidity currents. Likewise, the<br />

presence of a prominent axial channel and 2kmthick<br />

sedimentary fill in southern Hikurangi<br />

Trench, indicated similar trench-fill processes<br />

supplemented by the mass wasting of trench walls.<br />

However, the margin’s place within a plate tectonic<br />

model had yet to be appreciated.<br />

Intellectual and technological advances of the<br />

1970s started to shift emphasis from descriptive to<br />

process-oriented research. The shelf circulation and<br />

eustatic oscillations of sea level were shown to be<br />

key drivers of Quaternary sedimentation on and off<br />

the margin. The imprint of sea level change on a<br />

tectonically active seabed was identified on the<br />

Hikurangi margin, yielding landmark papers on<br />

sequence stratigraphy and sediment mass transport.<br />

Industry seismic data, especially that collected on<br />

the reconnaissance voyages of MOBIL’s Fred H.<br />

Moore, mapped the eastern margin in<br />

unprecedented detail. By 1978, results from marine<br />

and terrestrial research were sufficient to finally<br />

bring New Zealand into the plate tectonic fold; no<br />

doubt giving satisfaction to pioneers and early<br />

50 th <strong>Kaikoura</strong>05 -12- <strong>Kaikoura</strong> <strong>2005</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!