50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...
50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...
50thKaikoura05 -1- Kaikoura 2005 CHARACTERISATION OF NEW ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EXPLORING CONSTRAINTS ON<br />
ANTIQUITY <strong>OF</strong> TERRESTRIAL LIFE IN<br />
<strong>NEW</strong> ZEALAND<br />
H.J. Campbell 1 &C.A.Landis 2<br />
1 GNS Science, PO Box 30-368, Lower Hutt, New<br />
Zealand<br />
2 Department of Geology, University of Otago, PO<br />
Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand<br />
(h.campbell*gns.cri.nz)<br />
The New Zealand land surface appears to be less<br />
than 25 million years old.<br />
It therefore follows that the modern terrestrial biota<br />
is not descended from archaic ancestors residing on<br />
proto-New Zealand (Zealandia) when it broke away<br />
from Gondwana. Rather, it has evolved from<br />
accidental arrivals since New Zealand became<br />
emergent. For all that, the modern biota is indeed<br />
derived from lands of Gondwanan heritage.<br />
Our first statement is a bold assertion. It is based on<br />
systematic investigation of the geological evidence<br />
for ‘islands’ during latest Oligocene to earliest<br />
Miocene time. These ‘islands’ were first portrayed<br />
by Charles Fleming in 1959 and have subsequently<br />
become established in most treatments of New<br />
Zealand geological history and paleogeography<br />
since formation of the Geological Society 50 years<br />
ago.<br />
Our studies have shown that the geological<br />
evidence for the existence of islands during latest<br />
Oligocene to earliest Miocene time is either nonexistent<br />
or so wanting that we can confidently<br />
conclude that any islands that may have existed<br />
were small and short-lived. Here we critically<br />
evaluate four inferred mid-Cenozoic islands in:<br />
Fiordland, Central Otago, Northwest Nelson and<br />
central North Island.<br />
As part of this analysis, we have identified eight<br />
factors that appear to have influenced<br />
paleogeographic map reconstructions.<br />
This research has grown from exploration of<br />
regional planar surfaces in the New Zealand<br />
landscape and particularly the Waipounamu<br />
Erosion Surface as expressed in Otago and the<br />
Chatham Islands, and is supported by the ChEARS<br />
Marsden Project.<br />
All available geological evidence suggests that<br />
Zealandia broke away from Gondwana c. 85 Ma<br />
and then slowly sank 1,000 to 3,000 metres over a<br />
period of c. 60 million years, culminating in<br />
complete submergence c. 23 Ma (Waitakian).<br />
Shortly following this, plate boundary collision<br />
became vigorous resulting in tectonic emergence of<br />
New Zealand. This process is ongoing.<br />
ORAL<br />
UNCOVERING THE FACE <strong>OF</strong> THE<br />
EASTERN <strong>NEW</strong> ZEALAND MARGIN – A<br />
VIEW FROM THE OCEAN<br />
Lionel Carter 1 & Jarg Pettinga 2<br />
1 NIWA, Private Bag 14-901 Kilbirnie, Wellington,<br />
New Zealand<br />
2 University Canterbury, Private Bag 4800,<br />
Christchurch, New Zealand<br />
(l.carter*niwa.cri.nz)<br />
Our knowledge of New Zealand’s eastern margin,<br />
including the active Hikurangi and passive Bounty<br />
sectors, is surprisingly recent. Even though the<br />
broad outlines of these sectors were charted as early<br />
as 1910, it was not until 1958 that Hikurangi<br />
Trench and Bounty Trough were formally<br />
recognized. Being the pre-plate tectonic era, the<br />
forces behind these major oceanic forms were<br />
unclear. Hikurangi Trench was regarded as either a<br />
compressional or tensional feature, whereas Bounty<br />
Trough was seen as the consequence of large-scale<br />
uplift of the bordering Chatham Rise and Bounty<br />
Platform.<br />
Marine studies began in earnest in the mid-1960s.<br />
Systematic surveys were undertaken by the Navy<br />
and government research groups, but more<br />
significant was the oceanographic and geophysical<br />
transects run by the USNS Eltanin. This network of<br />
survey lines provided the first regional view of the<br />
eastern margin. Single channel seismic lines, in<br />
particular, highlighted the architecture of acoustic<br />
basement and sediment fill, as well as prominent<br />
morphological features. In Bounty Trough, the<br />
discovery of a canyon-channel system hinted at the<br />
long-distance transfer of South Island sediment to<br />
the deep ocean via turbidity currents. Likewise, the<br />
presence of a prominent axial channel and 2kmthick<br />
sedimentary fill in southern Hikurangi<br />
Trench, indicated similar trench-fill processes<br />
supplemented by the mass wasting of trench walls.<br />
However, the margin’s place within a plate tectonic<br />
model had yet to be appreciated.<br />
Intellectual and technological advances of the<br />
1970s started to shift emphasis from descriptive to<br />
process-oriented research. The shelf circulation and<br />
eustatic oscillations of sea level were shown to be<br />
key drivers of Quaternary sedimentation on and off<br />
the margin. The imprint of sea level change on a<br />
tectonically active seabed was identified on the<br />
Hikurangi margin, yielding landmark papers on<br />
sequence stratigraphy and sediment mass transport.<br />
Industry seismic data, especially that collected on<br />
the reconnaissance voyages of MOBIL’s Fred H.<br />
Moore, mapped the eastern margin in<br />
unprecedented detail. By 1978, results from marine<br />
and terrestrial research were sufficient to finally<br />
bring New Zealand into the plate tectonic fold; no<br />
doubt giving satisfaction to pioneers and early<br />
50 th <strong>Kaikoura</strong>05 -12- <strong>Kaikoura</strong> <strong>2005</strong>