30TH
v30n2
v30n2
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
THE MODERN AND<br />
CONTEMPORARY ART<br />
RESEARCH INITIATIVE<br />
BY TOM LEARNER AND JIM CODDINGTON<br />
THE GCI’S MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY ART RESEARCH<br />
Initiative 1 (ModCon) has been a major component in the Institute’s<br />
overall research portfolio since its official launch in 2007. By then,<br />
our interest and involvement in the conservation issues of modern<br />
and contemporary art had been growing for years, as had that of<br />
many other institutions and colleagues. One of the Institute’s first<br />
activities in this area was the 1998 conference “Mortality Immortality?<br />
The Legacy of 20th-Century Art.” This Getty event sought<br />
to foster a cross-disciplinary discussion among artists, art historians,<br />
collectors, conservators, and curators—collaboration that has<br />
now become the norm. Later, in 2002, as many research groups<br />
had begun to scientifically explore modern materials used in contemporary<br />
art, the GCI started a long-term study of conservation<br />
issues of modern paints, initially in collaboration with Tate,<br />
London, and the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC.<br />
Although a relatively recent addition to the GCI portfolio,<br />
ModCon is now in full swing, and it is not too soon to reflect on<br />
some of the advances made in the field since then and on how<br />
needs are evolving.<br />
ModCon was launched in response to a growing realization<br />
within the conservation profession that research in this area<br />
was a priority. Many key issues had already been identified, including<br />
broad philosophical and ethical matters and specific materials<br />
questions. Ethical dilemmas concerning the conservation<br />
and care of contemporary art have led to uncertainty in the art<br />
world. For example, an artist’s wish to refabricate a deteriorated<br />
work to recapture the object’s original appearance—frequently, if<br />
problematically, referred to as “the artist’s intention”—challenges<br />
conservation ethics on reversibility and conservation of original<br />
materials. Similarly, replacing obsolete technological elements of<br />
a technology-based work raises questions of how closely such a<br />
work now reflects the original, both materially and intellectually,<br />
and what role conservation plays in making that determination.<br />
The vast increase in the variety of materials used by artists to<br />
create works is a significant practical problem, since each of these<br />
materials has its own, often unique, set of aging properties, as well<br />
as display or storage requirements. Materials that are inherently<br />
unstable quickly show signs of deterioration and are, of course, of<br />
great concern to conservators. (One commonly cited example is<br />
early cellulosic plastics used in twentieth-century sculpture and<br />
A January 2013 meeting of experts convened by the GCI and the Getty Museum to discuss the conservation<br />
of Jackson Pollock’s Mural, (1943). Painting: University of Iowa Museum of Art, Gift of Peggy Guggenheim, 1959.6.<br />
Reproduced with permission from the University of Iowa. Photo: Stacey Rain Strickler, J. Paul Getty Museum.<br />
CONSERVATION PERSPECTIVES, THE GCI NEWSLETTER 29