09.12.2015 Views

30TH

v30n2

v30n2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE MODERN AND<br />

CONTEMPORARY ART<br />

RESEARCH INITIATIVE<br />

BY TOM LEARNER AND JIM CODDINGTON<br />

THE GCI’S MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY ART RESEARCH<br />

Initiative 1 (ModCon) has been a major component in the Institute’s<br />

overall research portfolio since its official launch in 2007. By then,<br />

our interest and involvement in the conservation issues of modern<br />

and contemporary art had been growing for years, as had that of<br />

many other institutions and colleagues. One of the Institute’s first<br />

activities in this area was the 1998 conference “Mortality Immortality?<br />

The Legacy of 20th-Century Art.” This Getty event sought<br />

to foster a cross-disciplinary discussion among artists, art historians,<br />

collectors, conservators, and curators—collaboration that has<br />

now become the norm. Later, in 2002, as many research groups<br />

had begun to scientifically explore modern materials used in contemporary<br />

art, the GCI started a long-term study of conservation<br />

issues of modern paints, initially in collaboration with Tate,<br />

London, and the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC.<br />

Although a relatively recent addition to the GCI portfolio,<br />

ModCon is now in full swing, and it is not too soon to reflect on<br />

some of the advances made in the field since then and on how<br />

needs are evolving.<br />

ModCon was launched in response to a growing realization<br />

within the conservation profession that research in this area<br />

was a priority. Many key issues had already been identified, including<br />

broad philosophical and ethical matters and specific materials<br />

questions. Ethical dilemmas concerning the conservation<br />

and care of contemporary art have led to uncertainty in the art<br />

world. For example, an artist’s wish to refabricate a deteriorated<br />

work to recapture the object’s original appearance—frequently, if<br />

problematically, referred to as “the artist’s intention”—challenges<br />

conservation ethics on reversibility and conservation of original<br />

materials. Similarly, replacing obsolete technological elements of<br />

a technology-based work raises questions of how closely such a<br />

work now reflects the original, both materially and intellectually,<br />

and what role conservation plays in making that determination.<br />

The vast increase in the variety of materials used by artists to<br />

create works is a significant practical problem, since each of these<br />

materials has its own, often unique, set of aging properties, as well<br />

as display or storage requirements. Materials that are inherently<br />

unstable quickly show signs of deterioration and are, of course, of<br />

great concern to conservators. (One commonly cited example is<br />

early cellulosic plastics used in twentieth-century sculpture and<br />

A January 2013 meeting of experts convened by the GCI and the Getty Museum to discuss the conservation<br />

of Jackson Pollock’s Mural, (1943). Painting: University of Iowa Museum of Art, Gift of Peggy Guggenheim, 1959.6.<br />

Reproduced with permission from the University of Iowa. Photo: Stacey Rain Strickler, J. Paul Getty Museum.<br />

CONSERVATION PERSPECTIVES, THE GCI NEWSLETTER 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!