2H 2015
intel-xeon-phi-sw-ecosystem-guide-2h-2015-public3 intel-xeon-phi-sw-ecosystem-guide-2h-2015-public3
Relative performance 1.00 1.22 3.00 1.23 2.19 2.35 3.40 4.58 5.51 1.11 1.17 1.34 1.58 1.59 1.72 1.85 1.85 2.09 2.12 3.13 6.94 7.04 8.91 1.15 1.20 1.26 1.28 1.35 1.37 1.49 1.50 1.55 1.56 1.67 2.03 3.25 6.50 1.51 1.88 2.43 2.04 4.70 0.45 1.11 1.12 1.18 1.37 1.20 1.27 1.53 1.73 3.48 1.31 1.57 Application Performance Snapshot Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor vs. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor 10 DCC Energy Financial Services Life Sciences Mfg. Physics Weather 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Source: Intel measured as of Q1 2015 Configuration Details: Please slide speaker notes. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance 8
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 and Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v3 Better Together with Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor Software Performance Increases with 2-Socket Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 + Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor 7120 compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 1 Software Performance Increases with 2-Socket Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v3 + Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor 7120 compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v3 1 Monte Carlo* European Options QuantLib* SP Monte Carlo ANSYS Mechanical Sandia Mantevo* Petrobas* Black-Scholes* Formula Valuation Monte Carlo Excel*-based QuantLib* SP Black Scholes Binomial Options* ASKAP* Iso3DFD LAMMPS Production Protein GROMACS* miniGhost* BWA-ALN* OpenLB* 2.12 2.09 1.84 1.85 1.73 1.72 1.61 1.56 1.55 1.50 1.53 2.30 2.20 3.34 6.93 1 Performance demonstrated in respective proof points in this presentation Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 8.91 Quantlib* SP Monte Carlo ANSYS Mechanical Monte Carlo RNG* European Options NAMD* 2.10 STMV Autodesk Maya* 2014 Binomial Options* NAMD* 2.10 ApoA1 BLASTn v.30 WRF* LAMMPS* Liquid Crystal; 32 nodes DMI* AMBER* 14 Tobacco Virus 1.45 1.33 1.25 1.54 1.52 1.52 1.49 1.87 1.75 1.74 2.61 3.8 9
- Page 1 and 2: 2H 2015
- Page 3 and 4: Intel® Modern Code Developer Chall
- Page 5 and 6: New or Updated Proof Points NEW pro
- Page 7: Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessors Softw
- Page 11 and 12: Memory Capacity (GB) Memory Compari
- Page 13 and 14: A Growing Ecosystem: The Intel® Xe
- Page 15 and 16: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Sti
- Page 17 and 18: Comparative Performance Johns Hopki
- Page 19 and 20: Comparative Performance 1 0 BLAST*
- Page 21 and 22: Comparative Performance NAMD* 2.10
- Page 23 and 24: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Liq
- Page 25 and 26: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Rho
- Page 27 and 28: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Liq
- Page 29 and 30: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Rho
- Page 31 and 32: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Pro
- Page 33 and 34: Comparative Performance AMBER* 14 P
- Page 35 and 36: Comparative Performance AMBER* 14 P
- Page 37 and 38: Comparative Performance Burrows-Whe
- Page 39 and 40: Comparative Performance NWChem* CCS
- Page 41 and 42: Discover and design like never befo
- Page 43 and 44: Comparative Performance miniGhost*
- Page 45 and 46: Comparative Performance Quantum ESP
- Page 47 and 48: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 49 and 50: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 51 and 52: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 53 and 54: Comparative Performance Sandia Mant
- Page 55 and 56: Comparative Increase Autodesk Maya*
- Page 57 and 58: Comparative Performance OpenLB* Cyl
Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 and Intel® Xeon® Processor<br />
E5-2697 v3 Better Together with Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor<br />
Software Performance Increases with 2-Socket Intel® Xeon®<br />
Processor E5-2697 v2 + Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor 7120<br />
compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 1<br />
Software Performance Increases with 2-Socket Intel® Xeon®<br />
Processor E5-2697 v3 + Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor 7120<br />
compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v3 1<br />
Monte Carlo* European Options<br />
QuantLib* SP Monte Carlo<br />
ANSYS Mechanical<br />
Sandia Mantevo*<br />
Petrobas*<br />
Black-Scholes* Formula Valuation<br />
Monte Carlo Excel*-based<br />
QuantLib* SP Black Scholes<br />
Binomial Options*<br />
ASKAP*<br />
Iso3DFD<br />
LAMMPS Production Protein<br />
GROMACS*<br />
miniGhost*<br />
BWA-ALN*<br />
OpenLB*<br />
2.12<br />
2.09<br />
1.84<br />
1.85<br />
1.73<br />
1.72<br />
1.61<br />
1.56<br />
1.55<br />
1.50<br />
1.53<br />
2.30<br />
2.20<br />
3.34<br />
6.93<br />
1 Performance demonstrated in respective proof points in this presentation<br />
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems,<br />
components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated<br />
purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.<br />
8.91<br />
Quantlib* SP Monte Carlo<br />
ANSYS Mechanical<br />
Monte Carlo RNG* European Options<br />
NAMD* 2.10 STMV<br />
Autodesk Maya* 2014<br />
Binomial Options*<br />
NAMD* 2.10 ApoA1<br />
BLASTn v.30<br />
WRF*<br />
LAMMPS* Liquid Crystal; 32 nodes<br />
DMI*<br />
AMBER* 14 Tobacco Virus<br />
1.45<br />
1.33<br />
1.25<br />
1.54<br />
1.52<br />
1.52<br />
1.49<br />
1.87<br />
1.75<br />
1.74<br />
2.61<br />
3.8<br />
9