2H 2015

intel-xeon-phi-sw-ecosystem-guide-2h-2015-public3 intel-xeon-phi-sw-ecosystem-guide-2h-2015-public3

07.12.2015 Views

Relative performance 1.00 1.22 3.00 1.23 2.19 2.35 3.40 4.58 5.51 1.11 1.17 1.34 1.58 1.59 1.72 1.85 1.85 2.09 2.12 3.13 6.94 7.04 8.91 1.15 1.20 1.26 1.28 1.35 1.37 1.49 1.50 1.55 1.56 1.67 2.03 3.25 6.50 1.51 1.88 2.43 2.04 4.70 0.45 1.11 1.12 1.18 1.37 1.20 1.27 1.53 1.73 3.48 1.31 1.57 Application Performance Snapshot Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor vs. 2 socket Intel® Xeon® processor 10 DCC Energy Financial Services Life Sciences Mfg. Physics Weather 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. Source: Intel measured as of Q1 2015 Configuration Details: Please slide speaker notes. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance 8

Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 and Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v3 Better Together with Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor Software Performance Increases with 2-Socket Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 + Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor 7120 compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 1 Software Performance Increases with 2-Socket Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v3 + Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor 7120 compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v3 1 Monte Carlo* European Options QuantLib* SP Monte Carlo ANSYS Mechanical Sandia Mantevo* Petrobas* Black-Scholes* Formula Valuation Monte Carlo Excel*-based QuantLib* SP Black Scholes Binomial Options* ASKAP* Iso3DFD LAMMPS Production Protein GROMACS* miniGhost* BWA-ALN* OpenLB* 2.12 2.09 1.84 1.85 1.73 1.72 1.61 1.56 1.55 1.50 1.53 2.30 2.20 3.34 6.93 1 Performance demonstrated in respective proof points in this presentation Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. 8.91 Quantlib* SP Monte Carlo ANSYS Mechanical Monte Carlo RNG* European Options NAMD* 2.10 STMV Autodesk Maya* 2014 Binomial Options* NAMD* 2.10 ApoA1 BLASTn v.30 WRF* LAMMPS* Liquid Crystal; 32 nodes DMI* AMBER* 14 Tobacco Virus 1.45 1.33 1.25 1.54 1.52 1.52 1.49 1.87 1.75 1.74 2.61 3.8 9

Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 and Intel® Xeon® Processor<br />

E5-2697 v3 Better Together with Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor<br />

Software Performance Increases with 2-Socket Intel® Xeon®<br />

Processor E5-2697 v2 + Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor 7120<br />

compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v2 1<br />

Software Performance Increases with 2-Socket Intel® Xeon®<br />

Processor E5-2697 v3 + Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor 7120<br />

compared to Intel® Xeon® Processor E5-2697 v3 1<br />

Monte Carlo* European Options<br />

QuantLib* SP Monte Carlo<br />

ANSYS Mechanical<br />

Sandia Mantevo*<br />

Petrobas*<br />

Black-Scholes* Formula Valuation<br />

Monte Carlo Excel*-based<br />

QuantLib* SP Black Scholes<br />

Binomial Options*<br />

ASKAP*<br />

Iso3DFD<br />

LAMMPS Production Protein<br />

GROMACS*<br />

miniGhost*<br />

BWA-ALN*<br />

OpenLB*<br />

2.12<br />

2.09<br />

1.84<br />

1.85<br />

1.73<br />

1.72<br />

1.61<br />

1.56<br />

1.55<br />

1.50<br />

1.53<br />

2.30<br />

2.20<br />

3.34<br />

6.93<br />

1 Performance demonstrated in respective proof points in this presentation<br />

Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems,<br />

components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated<br />

purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.<br />

8.91<br />

Quantlib* SP Monte Carlo<br />

ANSYS Mechanical<br />

Monte Carlo RNG* European Options<br />

NAMD* 2.10 STMV<br />

Autodesk Maya* 2014<br />

Binomial Options*<br />

NAMD* 2.10 ApoA1<br />

BLASTn v.30<br />

WRF*<br />

LAMMPS* Liquid Crystal; 32 nodes<br />

DMI*<br />

AMBER* 14 Tobacco Virus<br />

1.45<br />

1.33<br />

1.25<br />

1.54<br />

1.52<br />

1.52<br />

1.49<br />

1.87<br />

1.75<br />

1.74<br />

2.61<br />

3.8<br />

9

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!