2H 2015
intel-xeon-phi-sw-ecosystem-guide-2h-2015-public3 intel-xeon-phi-sw-ecosystem-guide-2h-2015-public3
“The Intel Xeon Phi coprocessor architecture provides truly impressive performance, and the potential to easily port applications represents a significant leap ahead.” Speeding discovery through faster, more accurate simulations. Astrophysics Greg Peterson, Director, National Institute for Computational Sciences 78
Comparative Performance BerkeleyGW* Sigma Phase 1 NODE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC PRESENTATION NEW 1 BerkeleyGW* Sigma Phase Speed Up 1.58X 1.31X 1.28X 1 Application: BerkeleyGW* (Sigma) Description: BerkeleyGW is a massively parallel computational package for electron-excited state properties. Sigma is the second half of the GW code. It gives the quasiparticle selfenergies and dispersion relation for quasielectron and quasihole states. Availability: • Code: Available here (version 1.1 beta). • Recipe: None. The exact input used is not available to the public although a similar input is available. Usage Model: MPI+OMP. In symmetric mode, MPI ranks are distributed to both the host and KNC card. Each MPI rank uses OMP threads (Hybrid). 0 Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v2 Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v3 Xeon E5-2697 v2 + Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessor 7120A Xeon E5-2697 v3 + Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessor 7120A “Xeon E5-2697 v2/v3” = Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v2/v3 Highlights: Hybrid MPI+OMP allows code to be run on both Intel® Xeon® processors and Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessors without any source modifications. Results: Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v3 speed up is up to 1.31X, and Intel Xeon processor E5-2697 v3 + Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessor 7120A speed up is up to 1.58X over the baseline processor. For configuration details, go here. SOURCE: INTEL MEASURED RESULTS AS OF DECEMBER, 2014 Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others 79
- Page 27 and 28: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Liq
- Page 29 and 30: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Rho
- Page 31 and 32: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Pro
- Page 33 and 34: Comparative Performance AMBER* 14 P
- Page 35 and 36: Comparative Performance AMBER* 14 P
- Page 37 and 38: Comparative Performance Burrows-Whe
- Page 39 and 40: Comparative Performance NWChem* CCS
- Page 41 and 42: Discover and design like never befo
- Page 43 and 44: Comparative Performance miniGhost*
- Page 45 and 46: Comparative Performance Quantum ESP
- Page 47 and 48: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 49 and 50: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 51 and 52: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 53 and 54: Comparative Performance Sandia Mant
- Page 55 and 56: Comparative Increase Autodesk Maya*
- Page 57 and 58: Comparative Performance OpenLB* Cyl
- Page 59 and 60: CLUSTER BENCHMARKS New Data Center
- Page 61 and 62: Comparative Performance Monte Carlo
- Page 63 and 64: Comparative Performance QuantLib* S
- Page 65 and 66: Comparative Performance Monte Carlo
- Page 67 and 68: Comparative Performance Monte Carlo
- Page 69 and 70: Comparative Performance Monte Carlo
- Page 71 and 72: Comparative Performance Xcelerit* L
- Page 73 and 74: Comparative Increase 1 0 Iso3DFD* 1
- Page 75 and 76: Comparative Performance Petrobras*
- Page 77: CLUSTER BENCHMARK Data Center Serve
- Page 81 and 82: Comparative Performance ASKAP* tHog
- Page 83 and 84: Comparative Increase specfem3D 300K
- Page 85 and 86: CLUSTER BENCHMARK 6,400 NODES APPRO
- Page 87 and 88: Comparative Performance Gyrokinetic
- Page 89 and 90: Comparative Increase ROMS* Idealize
- Page 91 and 92: Comparative Performance NASA* OVERF
- Page 93 and 94: Improving speed and quality through
- Page 95 and 96: Comparative Performance Embree 2.2
- Page 97 and 98: Intel® Software Development Tools
- Page 99 and 100: Features and Configurations Intel®
- Page 101 and 102: Speedup Turn Big Data Into Informat
- Page 103 and 104: Scalable Profiling for MPI and Hybr
- Page 105 and 106: Bright Cluster Manager* Advanced Cl
- Page 107 and 108: Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor Develo
- Page 109 and 110: Intel® Developer Zone Join us on S
- Page 111 and 112: Recommended Links Getting Started:
- Page 113 and 114: Hardware Configuration - Intel® Xe
- Page 115 and 116: OPTIMIZATION NOTICE Optimization No
“The Intel Xeon Phi coprocessor<br />
architecture provides truly<br />
impressive performance, and the<br />
potential to easily port<br />
applications represents a<br />
significant leap ahead.”<br />
Speeding discovery through faster, more accurate simulations.<br />
Astrophysics<br />
Greg Peterson,<br />
Director, National Institute for<br />
Computational Sciences<br />
78