2H 2015
intel-xeon-phi-sw-ecosystem-guide-2h-2015-public3 intel-xeon-phi-sw-ecosystem-guide-2h-2015-public3
Comparative Performance Binomial Options* Double Precision 1 NODE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC PRESENTATION Binomial Options Double Precision 2 1.54X 2X Application: Binomial European Option Pricing. Description: Binomial Options* is a popular derivative pricing benchmark widely used by investment banks such as UBS*, Bank of America* and Goldman-Sachs*. One of two most computational intensive workloads in FSI benchmark suites. 1 1 Availability: • Code: Available here. • Recipe: Available here. 0 .55X 2S Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v2 2S Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v3 2S Xeon E5-2697 v3 + Xeon Phi 7120A 2S Xeon E5-2697 v3 + 2 Xeon Phi 7120A “Xeon E5-2697 v3” = Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v3 “Xeon Phi 7120A” = Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessor 7120A Usage Model: Hybrid or Asynchronous offload on one shared memory host node with up to two coprocessor devices. Highlights: • More operations per option data set. • Benefits from Intel® AVX2 FMA. Results: The baseline Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v3 is nearly double the performance of the Intel® Xeon® processor E5- 2697 v2. Adding one coprocessor card increases the baseline performance by over 50%; adding two coprocessors more than doubles it. For configuration details, go here. SOURCE: INTEL MEASURED RESULTS AS OF JUNE, 2014 Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others 66
Comparative Performance Monte Carlo* European Options 1 NODE APPROVED FOR PUBLIC PRESENTATION 10 8 6 4 2 0 Monte Carlo* European Options Speed Up Single and Double Precision 1 1.51X Single Precision 10.65X 2S Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2670 1 1.4X Double Precision 4.32X Application: Monte Carlo* RNG European option pricing. Description: Monte Carlo RNG is a popular derivative pricing benchmark widely used by investment banks such as UBS*, Bank of America* and Goldman-Sachs*. More here. Availability: • Code: Available here. • Recipe: Available here. Usage Model: Single and double precision testing, host node with up to two coprocessor devices. Performance depends on raw computational power and the performance of exp2() Highlights: Dramatic performance scaling for both singleprecision and double-precision calculations. Results: For single precision, the Intel® Xeon® processor E5- 2697 v2 performance improvement is up to 1.51X compared to the baseline, and the 2x Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessor performance improvement is up to 10.65X. 2S Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v2 2x Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessor 7120A (pre-production HW/SW) For configuration details, go here. SOURCE: INTEL MEASURED RESULTS AS OF NOVEMBER, 2013 Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems, components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others 67
- Page 15 and 16: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Sti
- Page 17 and 18: Comparative Performance Johns Hopki
- Page 19 and 20: Comparative Performance 1 0 BLAST*
- Page 21 and 22: Comparative Performance NAMD* 2.10
- Page 23 and 24: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Liq
- Page 25 and 26: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Rho
- Page 27 and 28: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Liq
- Page 29 and 30: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Rho
- Page 31 and 32: Comparative Performance LAMMPS* Pro
- Page 33 and 34: Comparative Performance AMBER* 14 P
- Page 35 and 36: Comparative Performance AMBER* 14 P
- Page 37 and 38: Comparative Performance Burrows-Whe
- Page 39 and 40: Comparative Performance NWChem* CCS
- Page 41 and 42: Discover and design like never befo
- Page 43 and 44: Comparative Performance miniGhost*
- Page 45 and 46: Comparative Performance Quantum ESP
- Page 47 and 48: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 49 and 50: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 51 and 52: Comparative Performance ANSYS Mecha
- Page 53 and 54: Comparative Performance Sandia Mant
- Page 55 and 56: Comparative Increase Autodesk Maya*
- Page 57 and 58: Comparative Performance OpenLB* Cyl
- Page 59 and 60: CLUSTER BENCHMARKS New Data Center
- Page 61 and 62: Comparative Performance Monte Carlo
- Page 63 and 64: Comparative Performance QuantLib* S
- Page 65: Comparative Performance Monte Carlo
- Page 69 and 70: Comparative Performance Monte Carlo
- Page 71 and 72: Comparative Performance Xcelerit* L
- Page 73 and 74: Comparative Increase 1 0 Iso3DFD* 1
- Page 75 and 76: Comparative Performance Petrobras*
- Page 77 and 78: CLUSTER BENCHMARK Data Center Serve
- Page 79 and 80: Comparative Performance BerkeleyGW*
- Page 81 and 82: Comparative Performance ASKAP* tHog
- Page 83 and 84: Comparative Increase specfem3D 300K
- Page 85 and 86: CLUSTER BENCHMARK 6,400 NODES APPRO
- Page 87 and 88: Comparative Performance Gyrokinetic
- Page 89 and 90: Comparative Increase ROMS* Idealize
- Page 91 and 92: Comparative Performance NASA* OVERF
- Page 93 and 94: Improving speed and quality through
- Page 95 and 96: Comparative Performance Embree 2.2
- Page 97 and 98: Intel® Software Development Tools
- Page 99 and 100: Features and Configurations Intel®
- Page 101 and 102: Speedup Turn Big Data Into Informat
- Page 103 and 104: Scalable Profiling for MPI and Hybr
- Page 105 and 106: Bright Cluster Manager* Advanced Cl
- Page 107 and 108: Intel® Xeon Phi Coprocessor Develo
- Page 109 and 110: Intel® Developer Zone Join us on S
- Page 111 and 112: Recommended Links Getting Started:
- Page 113 and 114: Hardware Configuration - Intel® Xe
- Page 115 and 116: OPTIMIZATION NOTICE Optimization No
Comparative Performance<br />
Monte Carlo*<br />
European Options<br />
1 NODE<br />
APPROVED FOR PUBLIC PRESENTATION<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Monte Carlo* European Options Speed Up<br />
Single and Double Precision<br />
1<br />
1.51X<br />
Single Precision<br />
10.65X<br />
2S Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2670<br />
1<br />
1.4X<br />
Double Precision<br />
4.32X<br />
Application: Monte Carlo* RNG European option pricing.<br />
Description: Monte Carlo RNG is a popular derivative pricing<br />
benchmark widely used by investment banks such as UBS*, Bank<br />
of America* and Goldman-Sachs*. More here.<br />
Availability:<br />
• Code: Available here.<br />
• Recipe: Available here.<br />
Usage Model: Single and double precision testing, host node<br />
with up to two coprocessor devices. Performance depends on<br />
raw computational power and the performance of exp2()<br />
Highlights: Dramatic performance scaling for both singleprecision<br />
and double-precision calculations.<br />
Results: For single precision, the Intel® Xeon® processor E5-<br />
2697 v2 performance improvement is up to 1.51X compared to<br />
the baseline, and the 2x Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessor<br />
performance improvement is up to 10.65X.<br />
2S Intel® Xeon® processor E5-2697 v2<br />
2x Intel® Xeon Phi coprocessor 7120A (pre-production HW/SW)<br />
For configuration details, go here.<br />
SOURCE: INTEL MEASURED RESULTS AS OF NOVEMBER, 2013<br />
Software and workloads used in performance tests may have been optimized for performance only on Intel microprocessors. Performance tests, such as SYSmark and MobileMark, are measured using specific computer systems,<br />
components, software, operations and functions. Any change to any of those factors may cause the results to vary. You should consult other information and performance tests to assist you in fully evaluating your contemplated<br />
purchases, including the performance of that product when combined with other products. For more information go to http://www.intel.com/performance *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others<br />
67