07.12.2015 Views

TECHNOLOGY AT WORK

1Oclobi

1Oclobi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

February 2015<br />

Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions<br />

57<br />

Technology has two effects on employment<br />

— the destruction effect and the<br />

capitalisation effect<br />

The scope of automation is increasing as<br />

algorithms for big data are able to perform a<br />

much broader scope of non-routine tasks<br />

4. The World of Work in the 21 st<br />

Century<br />

What will the future of employment look like? Most past attempts to predict<br />

this have arguably been unsuccessful. In his famous chapter on machinery,<br />

published in the third edition of The Principles of Political Economy and<br />

Taxation in 1821, David Ricardo argued that the substitution of workers by<br />

machines may “render the population redundant.” 75 In a similar vein, John<br />

Maynard Keynes predicted widespread technological unemployment as a<br />

result of mankind failing to find sufficient new uses for its labour as machines<br />

replace workers in old occupations and industries. 76<br />

The obvious reason why this concern has not materialised is that the replacement<br />

of workers by machines will have effects on all product and factor markets. An<br />

increase in the efficiency of production which reduces the price of one product will in<br />

turn increase real income and thus increase demand for other goods.<br />

In short, technological progress has two competing effects on employment. As it<br />

substitutes for labour, there is a destruction effect, requiring workers to reallocate<br />

their labour, but there is also the capitalisation effect, as the demand for other goods<br />

and services increase, and new occupations and industries are created.<br />

Although the idea of technological unemployment did not materialise during the 20 th<br />

century, there is growing concern that Keynes’ prediction may come true. What will<br />

happen in the 21 st century remains to be seen, but it is clear that the potential scope of<br />

job automation is expanding and will inevitably continue to expand. Meanwhile, the jobs<br />

created by digital technologies have so far largely been confined to skilled workers. In<br />

this section, we highlight these developments and their potential implications.<br />

The Expanding Scope of Automation<br />

Historically, automation has been confined to routine tasks involving explicit rulebased<br />

activities that can easily be specified in computer code. 77 The term<br />

“computer”, for example, initially referred to an occupation stemming from the<br />

invention of calculus in the 18th century. With the advent of the electronic computer,<br />

the routine task of performing mathematical operations was transferred to<br />

machines, displacing human labour in the process. 78<br />

Since then the potential scope of computerisation has increased dramatically, and<br />

will inevitably continue to do so. Algorithms for big data are now rapidly entering<br />

domains reliant upon pattern recognition and can readily substitute for labour in a<br />

wide range of non-routine cognitive tasks. 79 Moreover, intelligent robots with<br />

enhanced senses and dexterity are now able to perform a much broader scope of<br />

non-routine manual tasks.<br />

This is changing the nature of work across occupations, industries and countries.<br />

With the improved sensing available to robots, jobs in transportation and logistics<br />

are now at risk of automation. Take the recent development in autonomous<br />

vehicles, for example, potentially making bus, truck and taxi drivers redundant.<br />

75 Ricardo (1821).<br />

76 Keynes (1930).<br />

77 Autor et al. (2003).<br />

78 Grier (2013).<br />

79 Frey and Osborne (2013).<br />

© 2015 Citigroup

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!