TECHNOLOGY AT WORK
1Oclobi
1Oclobi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
February 2015<br />
Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions<br />
55<br />
“Additive manufacturing”, or 3D printing,<br />
requires less cost, time and expertise than<br />
traditional manufacturing techniques<br />
3D printing is able to create complex<br />
geometries and is likely to generate<br />
employment in niche manufacturing<br />
industries<br />
There will be some employment replaced by<br />
3D printing, however it is unlikely to be of<br />
the same magnitude as other technologies<br />
mentioned in this report<br />
3D Printing<br />
3D printing, also known as "additive manufacturing", has been around since the<br />
1980s. Relative to traditional manufacturing techniques such as injection moulding<br />
or CNC milling, 3D printing is slower, has poorer finish quality and is more<br />
expensive per item. However, 3D printing requires less cost, time, and expertise to<br />
create a small number of new items and it obviates the need for expensive retooling<br />
to manufacture new products. It hence has traditionally found value in prototyping<br />
new designs, and for some high-value, low-volume products. The recent<br />
significance of additive manufacturing is found in its democratisation and<br />
automation of manufacturing tasks. 3D printing is able to make direct use of designs<br />
produced using CAD (computer-aided design) software to manufacture even<br />
complex geometries, whereas other manufacturing techniques demand detailed<br />
expertise to specify tooling paths. With an increasingly networked society,<br />
appropriate designs are readily shared or purchased, allowing even non-experts to<br />
begin 3D printing. Hence 3D printing provides a connection from the digital world to<br />
a flexible means of physical manufacturing, reducing the need for manufacturing<br />
workers. 3D printing technologies have recently been extended to produce items in<br />
plastics, glass, paper, ceramics and even metal. Growing demand has led to<br />
dramatic reductions in the size and cost of 3D printing devices, yet furthering their<br />
broad adoption, with printers now available for as little as $500 and able to<br />
comfortably fit on a workbench.<br />
Clearly, 3D printing will play a role in the future of manufacturing. It is capable of<br />
producing products unachievable by any other means, including those that<br />
comprise mixtures of materials. For example, its ability to create complex<br />
geometries is being used by General Electric to print components for its next<br />
generation LEAP engine. As such, it is likely to generate employment in niche<br />
manufacturing industries. It will enable nimble just-in-time manufacturing that is able<br />
to respond quickly to new demand. These demands could be rapidly determined<br />
using big data analysis enabled by the IoT and an increasingly networked society.<br />
Crucially, 3D printing is well suited to personalisation: products will be increasingly<br />
tailored to a customer's preferences, both explicitly stated and inferred from their<br />
data.<br />
This personalisation comes to the fore in medical and dental applications, allowing<br />
components tailored to detailed body measurements. The industry is beginning to<br />
adopt 3D printing for commercial purposes: in particular, 3D printing is core to the<br />
manufacturing process of both Phona, manufacturer of hearing aids, and Align,<br />
manufacturer of Invisalign dental braces. Personalisation is also the driver behind<br />
the nascent industry that is starting to use 3D printing for clothing, such as<br />
Electroloom, who print using composites of synthetic and organic materials. For<br />
example, Continuum offers 3D printed bikinis, in nylon, bespoke to the body shape<br />
and measurements submitted by a customer through their website.<br />
The employment impact of these technologies, however, is unlikely to be of the<br />
same magnitude as others mentioned in this report. In the United States, for<br />
example, manufacturing has already been heavily automated, dropping from 30% of<br />
employment in 1950 to less than 6% today. The jobs that remain often involve a<br />
portfolio of skills, the management of many machines, for which one additional<br />
machine is unlikely to be able to substitute. Nor does the broad distribution of<br />
manufacturing devices, capable of personalisation, suggest a transformational<br />
change in employment. Similar developments were realised with the introduction of<br />
the home (2D) printer and sewing machine, which did not stop people from<br />
purchasing newspapers and clothes, respectively, from traditional suppliers.<br />
© 2015 Citigroup