07.12.2015 Views

TECHNOLOGY AT WORK

1Oclobi

1Oclobi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

February 2015<br />

Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions<br />

53<br />

We can see $1.4 billion of savings from<br />

introducing full autonomy into just 10% of<br />

existing mining trucks, a meaningful number<br />

against total operating expenditure<br />

reductions of $8 billion so far and $35 billion<br />

of cost headwinds over the last decade<br />

The Numbers – Calculating the Benefit<br />

The biggest saving in applying autonomous technologies is undoubtedly through the<br />

possibility to cut labour costs, with over 30% of a miner’s cash costs stemming from<br />

staff. According to online media (Unmanned Systems News, Engineering and<br />

Mining Journal), it takes 4-5 drivers to operate a truck 24-hours, but up to 10 people<br />

in total once support staff are taken into account. Each driver is paid a salary on<br />

average of $120,000 per year, thus around half a billion dollars in cash costs for the<br />

operation of each truck (excluding the cost of support). According to an article in<br />

Wall Street Daily in May 2014, the population of autonomous trucks today is a mere<br />

0.5% of the 40,500 total global population of trucks. Our discussions with BHP<br />

suggest that one-tenth of trucks could be autonomous in the near future, whilst the<br />

most bullish comments suggest fully automated mines are a reality within the next<br />

10-15 years (according to Unmanned Systems News and Science and Technology<br />

World).<br />

A simple calculation of the benefits just from cutting down staff (ignoring the<br />

increase in productivity) looks as follows:<br />

According to a study by Deloitte on the economics of autonomous mining,<br />

introducing an autonomous truck could reduce the number of operators by 75%, i.e.<br />

1-2 operators are sufficient instead of 4-5 today. This implies a $360,000 reduction<br />

in cash costs, or $1.4 billion in total assuming 10% of the truck population is<br />

autonomous (Figure 43). A cost reduction of $1.4 billion is meaningful and<br />

compares to about $8 billion of total savings from the majors achieved so far and<br />

$35 billion of cost headwinds over the last decade.<br />

On the productivity gains and other costs such as maintenance, John Meech at the<br />

University of British Columbia in Canada presented his findings in the paper<br />

“Simulation of Autonomous Mine Haulage Trucks” in 2012, which showed a 15-20%<br />

increase in output, 10-15% decrease in fuel consumption and an 8% reduction in<br />

maintenance costs, by shifting to autonomous haulers. Compared to autonomous<br />

drill rigs, this is interesting, as Sandvik and Flanders have presented figures<br />

showing that autonomous drill rigs can increase productivity by near double the<br />

level of autonomous haulers — by 30%, and in some cases by 60% when shifting to<br />

autonomous drilling (Figure 44).<br />

Figure 43. Implied cost savings by adopting autonomous trucks<br />

Truck population (units)<br />

No of drivers Salary per Cash costs Savings per Manual Autonomous Total<br />

per truck driver ($) per truck truck ($m)<br />

savings<br />

($m)<br />

($bn)<br />

Today 4-5 120,000 600,000 40,500 203<br />

Implied 1-2 120,000 240,000 360,000 36,450 4,050 1.4<br />

Source: Citi Research, Deloitte, University of British Columbia<br />

© 2015 Citigroup

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!