TECHNOLOGY AT WORK
1Oclobi
1Oclobi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
February 2015<br />
Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions<br />
53<br />
We can see $1.4 billion of savings from<br />
introducing full autonomy into just 10% of<br />
existing mining trucks, a meaningful number<br />
against total operating expenditure<br />
reductions of $8 billion so far and $35 billion<br />
of cost headwinds over the last decade<br />
The Numbers – Calculating the Benefit<br />
The biggest saving in applying autonomous technologies is undoubtedly through the<br />
possibility to cut labour costs, with over 30% of a miner’s cash costs stemming from<br />
staff. According to online media (Unmanned Systems News, Engineering and<br />
Mining Journal), it takes 4-5 drivers to operate a truck 24-hours, but up to 10 people<br />
in total once support staff are taken into account. Each driver is paid a salary on<br />
average of $120,000 per year, thus around half a billion dollars in cash costs for the<br />
operation of each truck (excluding the cost of support). According to an article in<br />
Wall Street Daily in May 2014, the population of autonomous trucks today is a mere<br />
0.5% of the 40,500 total global population of trucks. Our discussions with BHP<br />
suggest that one-tenth of trucks could be autonomous in the near future, whilst the<br />
most bullish comments suggest fully automated mines are a reality within the next<br />
10-15 years (according to Unmanned Systems News and Science and Technology<br />
World).<br />
A simple calculation of the benefits just from cutting down staff (ignoring the<br />
increase in productivity) looks as follows:<br />
According to a study by Deloitte on the economics of autonomous mining,<br />
introducing an autonomous truck could reduce the number of operators by 75%, i.e.<br />
1-2 operators are sufficient instead of 4-5 today. This implies a $360,000 reduction<br />
in cash costs, or $1.4 billion in total assuming 10% of the truck population is<br />
autonomous (Figure 43). A cost reduction of $1.4 billion is meaningful and<br />
compares to about $8 billion of total savings from the majors achieved so far and<br />
$35 billion of cost headwinds over the last decade.<br />
On the productivity gains and other costs such as maintenance, John Meech at the<br />
University of British Columbia in Canada presented his findings in the paper<br />
“Simulation of Autonomous Mine Haulage Trucks” in 2012, which showed a 15-20%<br />
increase in output, 10-15% decrease in fuel consumption and an 8% reduction in<br />
maintenance costs, by shifting to autonomous haulers. Compared to autonomous<br />
drill rigs, this is interesting, as Sandvik and Flanders have presented figures<br />
showing that autonomous drill rigs can increase productivity by near double the<br />
level of autonomous haulers — by 30%, and in some cases by 60% when shifting to<br />
autonomous drilling (Figure 44).<br />
Figure 43. Implied cost savings by adopting autonomous trucks<br />
Truck population (units)<br />
No of drivers Salary per Cash costs Savings per Manual Autonomous Total<br />
per truck driver ($) per truck truck ($m)<br />
savings<br />
($m)<br />
($bn)<br />
Today 4-5 120,000 600,000 40,500 203<br />
Implied 1-2 120,000 240,000 360,000 36,450 4,050 1.4<br />
Source: Citi Research, Deloitte, University of British Columbia<br />
© 2015 Citigroup