TECHNOLOGY AT WORK
1Oclobi
1Oclobi
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
February 2015<br />
Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions<br />
19<br />
Joe Seydl<br />
Global Economics Research Team<br />
Ebrahim Rahbari<br />
European and Global Economics Research<br />
Team<br />
The current trend towards job polarisation is best captured by Maarten Goos and<br />
Alan Manning’s work on “Lousy and Lovely Jobs”, with employment growth in highincome<br />
cognitive jobs and low-income manual occupations, accompanied by the<br />
disappearance of middle-income routine jobs. 39<br />
Evidence of Polarisation in Jobs and Wages<br />
There is a compelling case that robotics and other technological marvels will have a<br />
dramatically positive overall effect on living standards. Automation will hasten the<br />
growth of labour productivity, and aggregate welfare will rise in tandem with real<br />
wages. But, not all technological changes are created equal. The extent to which an<br />
individual gains or losses from automation will depend on their level of skill as well<br />
as the degree of ‘skill bias’ embedded in new technology. In other words, it will<br />
depend largely on whether that individual is a substitute or a complement to the<br />
robot knocking on their workplace door.<br />
The dominant narrative characterising how global labour markets are responding to<br />
technological change is one of ‘job polarisation’: the fact that employment growth<br />
has been most robust at the highest and lowest ends of the skills spectrum. The<br />
middle skill jobs, in contrast, contain the highest concentration of routine tasks and<br />
are thus relatively easy to automate. 40<br />
Much of the job growth in the US in recent<br />
decades has occurred in high- and lowskilled<br />
occupations, leading to a polarised<br />
labour market<br />
Evidence for job polarisation in the US is shown in Figure 8, which tracks<br />
employment trends since the 1980s for professions falling into three different<br />
categories of skills. High- and low-skilled jobs involve tasks that are non-routine,<br />
requiring either cognitive capacity or manual labour to complete them. At the high<br />
end, these include jobs in managerial and professional occupations, such as those<br />
in law, architecture and design, and finance; at the low end, jobs requiring manual<br />
labour are found in the construction sector, in installation and maintenance, and in<br />
the transportation and shipping sectors (e.g. truck drivers), to name a few. In the<br />
middle are routine jobs that require the use of either cognition or manual labour to<br />
complete tasks. Routine cognitive tasks are performed in sales and office-related<br />
professions (e.g. administrative secretaries); routine manual tasks are done mainly<br />
in the services sector, in healthcare support or food preparation roles, for example.<br />
Figure 8 uses data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS’s) Household<br />
Survey to make the point that much of the job growth witnessed in the US in recent<br />
decades has occurred in high- and low-skilled occupations – for those possessing<br />
cognitive or manual skills that are not easily automatable.<br />
39 Goos and Manning (2007).<br />
40 A detailed analysis of the link between automation and job polarisation is provided in<br />
Autor, D. (2014a)<br />
© 2015 Citigroup