07.12.2015 Views

TECHNOLOGY AT WORK

1Oclobi

1Oclobi

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

February 2015<br />

Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions<br />

19<br />

Joe Seydl<br />

Global Economics Research Team<br />

Ebrahim Rahbari<br />

European and Global Economics Research<br />

Team<br />

The current trend towards job polarisation is best captured by Maarten Goos and<br />

Alan Manning’s work on “Lousy and Lovely Jobs”, with employment growth in highincome<br />

cognitive jobs and low-income manual occupations, accompanied by the<br />

disappearance of middle-income routine jobs. 39<br />

Evidence of Polarisation in Jobs and Wages<br />

There is a compelling case that robotics and other technological marvels will have a<br />

dramatically positive overall effect on living standards. Automation will hasten the<br />

growth of labour productivity, and aggregate welfare will rise in tandem with real<br />

wages. But, not all technological changes are created equal. The extent to which an<br />

individual gains or losses from automation will depend on their level of skill as well<br />

as the degree of ‘skill bias’ embedded in new technology. In other words, it will<br />

depend largely on whether that individual is a substitute or a complement to the<br />

robot knocking on their workplace door.<br />

The dominant narrative characterising how global labour markets are responding to<br />

technological change is one of ‘job polarisation’: the fact that employment growth<br />

has been most robust at the highest and lowest ends of the skills spectrum. The<br />

middle skill jobs, in contrast, contain the highest concentration of routine tasks and<br />

are thus relatively easy to automate. 40<br />

Much of the job growth in the US in recent<br />

decades has occurred in high- and lowskilled<br />

occupations, leading to a polarised<br />

labour market<br />

Evidence for job polarisation in the US is shown in Figure 8, which tracks<br />

employment trends since the 1980s for professions falling into three different<br />

categories of skills. High- and low-skilled jobs involve tasks that are non-routine,<br />

requiring either cognitive capacity or manual labour to complete them. At the high<br />

end, these include jobs in managerial and professional occupations, such as those<br />

in law, architecture and design, and finance; at the low end, jobs requiring manual<br />

labour are found in the construction sector, in installation and maintenance, and in<br />

the transportation and shipping sectors (e.g. truck drivers), to name a few. In the<br />

middle are routine jobs that require the use of either cognition or manual labour to<br />

complete tasks. Routine cognitive tasks are performed in sales and office-related<br />

professions (e.g. administrative secretaries); routine manual tasks are done mainly<br />

in the services sector, in healthcare support or food preparation roles, for example.<br />

Figure 8 uses data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics’ (BLS’s) Household<br />

Survey to make the point that much of the job growth witnessed in the US in recent<br />

decades has occurred in high- and low-skilled occupations – for those possessing<br />

cognitive or manual skills that are not easily automatable.<br />

39 Goos and Manning (2007).<br />

40 A detailed analysis of the link between automation and job polarisation is provided in<br />

Autor, D. (2014a)<br />

© 2015 Citigroup

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!