TECHNOLOGY AT WORK
1Oclobi
1Oclobi
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
February 2015<br />
Citi GPS: Global Perspectives & Solutions<br />
17<br />
Increasing demand for low-skilled workers<br />
plus a surge in productivity helped boost<br />
employment and wage growth over the<br />
course of the 19 th century<br />
The shift in demand for higher-skilled<br />
workers can be traced to the switch to<br />
electricity<br />
The shift to mass production was also<br />
helped by the transportation revolution and<br />
led to the advent of multinational<br />
corporations<br />
The combination of increasing demand for low-skilled workers, and the surge in<br />
productivity following the transition to the factory system, helped boost employment<br />
and wage growth over the course of the 19th century, benefiting ordinary people as<br />
producers. According to some estimates, real wages nearly doubled between 1820<br />
and 1850. 32<br />
A crucial feature of technological change in the 19 th century was that it benefited<br />
ordinary people both as producers and consumers. While the factory system<br />
provided vast employment opportunities for unskilled workers, it also enabled Ford<br />
to manufacture the Model-T at a sufficiently low price for it to reach the mass<br />
market. It was these two processes of growing wages and falling prices of<br />
consumer goods that created the modern middle class. Some economic historians<br />
such as Gregory Clark have even argued that ordinary workers were the greatest<br />
beneficiaries of the Industrial Revolution.<br />
Electrification and the Demand for Skills<br />
The idea that skilled workers have been the main beneficiaries of technological<br />
progress is largely a 20th century phenomenon. This shift in demand for skills can<br />
be traced to the switch to electricity and the removal of the steam engine, leading to<br />
a complete reorganisation of production. 33 Crucially, the restructuring of the factory<br />
that followed significantly reduced the demand for maintenance workers as well as<br />
unskilled labourers who had previously carried unfinished goods and tools.<br />
Furthermore, the shift to continuous-process and batch production methods<br />
reduced the demand for unskilled workers in many assembly tasks. In short, while<br />
factory assembly lines had required vast amounts of human work, electrification<br />
allowed many stages in production to be automated. This, in turn, increased the<br />
demand for relatively skilled workers to operate the machinery.<br />
The transport revolution played an important role in incentivizing the shift to mass<br />
production, as it lowered the cost of shipping goods both domestically and<br />
internationally. 34 Markets for artisan goods, that had previously been local, now<br />
became subject to increased competition, forcing companies to raise productivity<br />
through mechanisation in order to maintain their competitive edge. With the<br />
emergence of the multinational corporation, management tasks became more<br />
complex, increasing the demand for managerial and clerking workers.<br />
Crucially, this transformation did not lead to the type of technological unemployment<br />
John Maynard Keynes predicted in the 1930s. Workers adapted by making their<br />
skills complementary to the arrival of new technologies. In the United States, for<br />
example, the high school movement was essential to the transformation of the<br />
corporation, as the office entered a wave of mechanisation, with typewriters,<br />
dictaphones, calculators, and address machines. An important feature of these<br />
technologies is that while they reduced the cost of information processing, they<br />
increased the demand for high school-educated workers. Indeed, since<br />
electrification, the story of the 20 th century has been what Claudia Goldin and<br />
Lawrence Katz have referred to as “the race between technology and education.”<br />
32 Lindert and Williamson (1983)<br />
33 Gray (2013)<br />
34 Atack et al. (2008b)<br />
© 2015 Citigroup