07.12.2012 Views

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

would be more sustainable and constructive if they were more sensitive to<br />

the origins, dynamics, and differential experience of local people, and paid<br />

more attention to the challenges of minimizing risks and coping with<br />

crises. Intervention projects should therefore build on local practices by<br />

identifying what Turkana people have rather than what they don’t have,<br />

and strengthen local inventive solutions, rather than substitute for, or<br />

undermine them.<br />

The prominence of my interest in undertaking this research originates with<br />

three experiences: First, while working in rural Turkana District as a<br />

government officer in 1999, the annual drought, enormous suffering, and<br />

ensuing famine made me feel that something needed to be done to change<br />

things for the better, to enhance the Turkana people’s resilience to<br />

drought, and see the end of media coverage that documented their sorrow<br />

and misery. I began to realize that the Turkana’s own capacity to recover<br />

from drought depends on their ability to draw on their network of social<br />

relations for help, and that the more people with whom one has close<br />

relations, the better. Their social networking acts as an informal safety<br />

net 15 which promotes social stability. The safety net function of networks<br />

is crucial to understanding the Turkana’s ability to cope with economic or<br />

physical shocks to their livelihood.<br />

Secondly, Soja, (1968), in his book ‘The Geography of Modernization in<br />

Kenya’, taught me that during the pre-colonial past, many nomadic<br />

communities such as the Turkana were not vulnerable to calamities<br />

(crises) as they were wealthy, well-fed and politically powerful. Turkana<br />

herders constantly switched back and forth between a range of livelihood<br />

activities depending on whether conditions were good or bad. They<br />

mobilized a set of livelihood strategies 16 which they resorted to in times of<br />

15 My study adopts Devereux (2001) definition of safety net as non-market transfers of<br />

goods and services between households.<br />

16 See Corbett (1988) for a description of the sequential phases that characterise coping<br />

behaviour following a disaster such as drought.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!