07.12.2012 Views

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

PhD thesis Title Page Final _Richard Juma - Victoria University ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

shooting 300 “niggers” during his expedition. “I do not like the blackman”,<br />

he wrote, “I regard him as one big monkey” 103 (Lamphear 1992: 53). He<br />

was accompanied by an Austrian naval lieutenant, Ritter Ludwig von<br />

Hohnel, who served as the expedition’s geographer and recorder. They<br />

were followed by a succession of explorers: Fredrick Jackson, a British<br />

man in 1889; Donaldson Smith an American in 1895; Arthur H. Neumann<br />

a Briton in 1895; and Vittorio Bottego, an Italian, Henry Cavendish, a<br />

British adventurer, and Hugh Cholmondeley, a British hunter in 1897.<br />

Lamphear (1976) expressed that these Europeans were also followed by a<br />

series of mostly prejudiced and sometimes violent explorers and hunters. It<br />

could be noted that despite these explorers visiting Turkana, key decisions<br />

which would have profound effects on the future of Turkana were still<br />

being made in faroff places as the British administration was based within<br />

the Kenya highlands (Lamphear 1992). Barber (1968) claims that Turkana<br />

was a marginal area in every way. The harsh environment and sparse<br />

population offered few attractions to the colonial government. Turkana was<br />

not considered to be strategically important, and it showed no evidence of<br />

economic potential to justify the cost of subjecting it to regular<br />

administration. As a result, little if any attention was given to the Turkana<br />

pastoralists, their environment or their social promotion<br />

Hendrickson, et al. (1998) argue that the isolation of the Turkana people<br />

was generally because of the colonial government’s mistrust of their<br />

lifestyle. The colonial government had a notion that Turkana pastoralists<br />

were politically unreliable and difficult to control, and therefore a threat to<br />

security. Furthermore, the Turkana people were perceived as primitive,<br />

violent, and hostile towards change, and they lacked loyalty because of<br />

crossborder movements (Hendrickson, et al. 1998). But Markasis (1993:<br />

193) argues to the contrary that the use of negative terms such as “war-<br />

like” and “violent” was a way of creating an enemy image and using it as<br />

103 This testimony portrays the negative attitude the first Europeans had against Turkana<br />

people.<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!