Biodeterioration-tests on wood/plastic composites - CHIMICA OGGI ...

Biodeterioration-tests on wood/plastic composites - CHIMICA OGGI ... Biodeterioration-tests on wood/plastic composites - CHIMICA OGGI ...

chemistry.today.teknoscienze.com
from chemistry.today.teknoscienze.com More from this publisher
07.12.2012 Views

patterns when feeding in groups using all resources to the maximum (8). Although some preferences for certain wood species may occur (9-11), all cellulose containing material can be used as food and energy sources. Termites, therefore, feed on any wooden material. As termites, especially subterranean termites, search for food, they may penetrate and damage many noncellulose materials as well, including plastics, even if these do not serve as food source and can not be digested (12). The sharp mouth parts of worker termites can abrade or break apart virtually any material and the high reproductive rate in termites instantly replaces workers with blunt mandibles. It is therefore not surprising that most plastics failed in ong>testsong> for resistance to termites (13- 16). Nevertheless, differences exist between different plastics and their susceptibility to termite attack. Condensation-plastics like polyesters appear more resistant than additionplastics like polyethylene, polystyrene and polyurethane (13). However, it is not only the mechanical hardness of plastics that characterises durability against termite attack, the surface structure is just as important. Smooth, even levelled surfaces, are more likely to prevent termite attack, but the smallest cracks and crevices or ruffled surfaces and edges provide immediate access for termite mandibles. The same holds true for WPCs. Once the surface is broken, destruction is only a matter of time and termite population density, unless the material is protected by either an effective termiticide or a repellent that prevents continuous feeding. Although it was shown that drywood termites are capable of attacking plastics (13), it is considered unlikely that this group of Wood/plastic composites (WPC) are a fairly new category of materials on the market. The authors point out biological procedures to characterise and specify different WPC-materials. While moisture is essential for growths of algae and fungi, termites can also attack dry materials. Whether biocides are needed for protection of a materials depends on the environment it will be exposed to during its use. termites would infest plastics to establish colonies as they do in pure wooden structures. For WPCs this still needs to be demonstrated. USE CLASSES FOR WOODEN MATERIALS Before deciding on measures to protect the WPC it is important to decide where the material has to perform and to what environment it will be exposed. In the field of wood protection, the definition of use classes (former hazard classes) was found to be useful and could now also be applied to identify the intended use for WPC-materials (17, 18). These use classes cover the following general service situations: Use class 1 for interior and covered, use class 2 for interior and not covered, use class 3 for exterior above ground, use class 4 for exterior in the ground or fresh water and use class 5 for use in salt water. Some minor subdivisions in the use classes may occur. TESTING OF WPCS FOR BIOLOGICAL DURABILITY In Europe, CEN with its Technical Committee 249, Working Group 13, has been working on laboratory methods to characterise WPCs since 2003. Chapter 8.6 of the technical specification TS 15534-1released in 2006, “Resistance against biological agents” (19), deals with the different forms of microbiological decay (Annex C: termites, Annex D: wood destroying basidiomycetes, Annex E: soft rotting micro-fungi, Annex F: discolouring micro-fungi and algae). Biocides

Biocides 22 The test methods described in TC 15534-1 are intended to be used for the characterization and specification of WPCs. They are derived from existing test methods in the fields of wood protection, plastics and coatings. The methods presented, although used for many years for biocide-treated or untreated material, were not primarily designed for WPCs. In the future it is likely that the test methods will need to be adapted to WPC materials and products. Laboratory ong>testsong> Accelerated testing in the laboratory can be helpful to rank resistance against fungal or algal growth of WPC-materials. TS 15534-1 lists a variety of ong>testsong> (19). Problems associated with surface moulds on plastics (20) and algae on coatings (21) are addressed in test standards which employ visual estimations to rate or rank the results. Both standards are regarded as being useful to estimate the susceptibility of WPC surfaces to support surface growth on WPC-materials. The following three standards and specifications (see below) were all originally developed for testing durability of wood and wood-based products. While the termite-standard (22) requires the visual estimation of results, the two methods for fungal decay determine the mass loss of wood in percent based on the original mass of wood in a WPC (23, 24). The appropriate way of preconditioning (e.g. UV-irradiation, artificial weathering, leaching) of WPCs before testing is still a much debated topic. For the simulation of water uptake in practise (which might take some years in certain environments before the material can be decayed) several standardised options are mentioned in TS 15534 (25-27). Field ong>testsong> and the fungus cellar No field ong>testsong> are mentioned in TS 15534. Nevertheless, they should be considered or recommended as a second tier after laboratory ong>testsong>. This is especially the case for the evaluation of resistance to termites, since, under field situations, WPCs may be either neglected as a source of food or attacked only to a minimum when there is a choice between several food sources including all sorts of natural, cellulose containing materials. For testing WPC-materials or products against microbial decay the test methods for preservative treated wood can be adopted with success (28). However, since field ong>testsong> can take several years, methods for accelerated testing in soil (e.g. fungus cellar) should be considered (29, 30). ENHANCING THE DURABILITY OF WPCS AGAINST ORGANISMS As mentioned above, several steps can be considered to improve the resistance of WPC to biological attack. These considerations will certainly also be driven by cost and intended lifespan. Wood waste from saw mills etc. is a cheap raw material to substitute plastics with. Wood of fast growing species is easier to source and therefore cheaper than wood from slow growing species. Also, wood modification processes exist (e.g. acetylation) that improve the resistance against decay compared to non-modified wood (2). However, these processes have to be performed before the wood comes in contact with the plastic and therefore causes additional production costs. Today, zinc-borate is the major biocide used in WPCs against a wide range of organisms. It exhibits fungicidal properties against surface moulds (31) and wood decaying fungi and it is termiticidal. It is also thermally stable and thus compatible with production process of WPC and acts a flame retardant for plastics (3). Fungicides acting against surface moulds only, e.g. Thiabendazole or DCOITbased formulations, are also employed. Anti-algal properties on the surface of WPCs can be introduced into a WPC material e.g. by algicides such as Terbutryne. CONCLUSION Depending on the expected life time and type of exposure (see use classes above), WPCs can become overgrown by and/or attacked by microorganisms. Furthermore, termites are a hazard to WPCs in certain regions of the world. Even if termites only attack WPCs under natural field conditions to a minimum, they can provide ports of entry for increased moisture and thus favour microbial decay. Depending on the intended use of a WPC material, its durability and performance should be tested. TS 15534 lists some tools in this respect. Field ong>testsong> and fungus cellar ong>testsong> should be considered as further option to characterise the long-term stability of a WPC material or products. Further, tailored test protocols would be advisable to optimise product developments outside of a given standard. REFERENCES AND NOTES 1. D. Vogt, M. Karus et al., nova-publications, nova-Institut GmbH (2006). 2. P. Larsson-Brelid, paper prepared for the 37th meeting of Int. Research Group on Wood Preservation; Tromsoe, Norway, accessible under www.IRG-wp.org, IRG/WP 06-40338 (2006). 3. W. Wang, J.J. Morrell, Forest Products Journal 54, pp. 209-212 (2004). 4. C.M. Clemons, R.E. Ibach, Forest Products Journal 54, pp. 50-57 (2004). 5. J. Simonsen, C.M. Freitag et al., Holzforschung 54, pp. 2005-2008 (2004). 6. N.E. Hickin, The Insect Factor in Wood Decay, Hutchinson, London (1968). 7. M.J. Pearce., Termites, CAB International (19997). 8. T. Abe, D.E. Bignell et al., Termites: Evolution, Sociality, Symbioses, Ecology, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2000). 9. S.S. Bampton, D. Butterworth et al., Material und Organismen 1, pp. 185-199 (1965/66). 10. D. Butterworth, D. Kay et al., Material und Organismen 1, pp. 257-269 (1965/66). 11. R. Mannesmann, Material und Organismus 8, pp. 107-120 (1973). 12. R.H. Beal, J.K. Mauldin et al., United States Department of Agriculture Home and Garden Bulletin 64 (1986). 13. G. Becker, Materialprüfung 5, pp. 218-232 (1963). 14. D. Butterworth, D. Kay et al., Material und Organismen 1, pp. 241-255 (1965/66). 15. U. Unger, A. Unger, Plaste und Kautschuk 31, pp. 241-247 (1984). 16. W. Unger, Holztechnologie 26, pp. 240-241 (1985). 17. DIN EN 599-1:1997 Durability of wood and wood-based products - Performance of preventive wood preservatives as determined by biological ong>testsong> - Part 1: Specification according to hazard class (1997). 18. American Wood-Preservers’ Association Standard, ASTM U1-07 2007 Use Catergory System: User Specification for treated wood (2007). 19. CEN/TS 15534-1:2006 Wood Plastic Composites (WPC) - Part 1: Test methods for characterisation of WPC materials and products (2006). 20. ISO/FDIS 16869 “Plastics – Assessment of the effectiveness of fungistatic compounds in plastic formulations” (2008). 21. EN 15458 “Paints and Varnishes - Laboratory method for testing the efficacy of film preservatives in a coating against algae” (2007). 22. EN 117: 2005 “Wood preservatives - Determination of toxic values against European Reticulitermes species - (Laboratory method)“ (2005). 23. ENV 12038:2002 “Durability of wood and wood-based products – wood based panels - Methods for determining the resistance against wooddestroying basidiomycetes” is suitable (2002). 24. CEN/TS 15083-2:2005 “Durability of wood and wood-based products - Determination of the natural durability of solid wood against wooddestroying fungi, test methods - Part 2: Soft rotting micro-fungi” (2005). 25. DIN EN 927-6:2006 Paints and varnishes - Coating materials and coating systems for exterior wood - Part 6: Exposure of wood coatings to artificial weathering using fluorescent UV lamps and water (2006). 26. DIN EN 321:2002 Wood-based panels - Determination of moisture resistance under cyclic test conditions (2002). 27. DIN EN 152-1:1989 Test methods for wood preservatives; laboratory method for determining the protective effectiveness of a preservative treatment against blue stain in service (1989). 28. DIN EN 252:1990 Field test method for determining the relative protective effectiveness of a wood preservative in ground contact (1990). 29. I. Stephan, M. Grinda et al., International Research Group on Wood Preservation DocNo. IRG/WP 98 20149 (1998). 30. J. van Acker, paper prepared for the 37th meeting of Int. Research Group on Wood Preservation; Tromsoe, Norway 2006, accessible under www.IRG-wp.org, IRG/WP 06-20347 (2006). 31. B.Dawson-Andoh, L. Matuna, Holz als Roh - und Werkstoff 65, pp. 331- 334 (2007). INA STEPHAN, RUDY PLARRE BAM Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing Unter den Eichen 87 Berlin, 12205, Germany chimica oggi • Chemistry Today • vol 26 n 3 / May-June 2008

patterns when feeding in groups using all resources to the<br />

maximum (8). Although some preferences for certain <strong>wood</strong><br />

species may occur (9-11), all cellulose c<strong>on</strong>taining material can<br />

be used as food and energy sources. Termites, therefore, feed<br />

<strong>on</strong> any <strong>wood</strong>en material.<br />

As termites, especially subterranean termites, search for<br />

food, they may penetrate and damage many n<strong>on</strong>cellulose<br />

materials as well, including <strong>plastic</strong>s, even if these do not<br />

serve as food source and can not be digested (12). The<br />

sharp mouth parts of worker termites can abrade or break<br />

apart virtually any material and the high<br />

reproductive rate in termites instantly replaces<br />

workers with blunt mandibles.<br />

It is therefore not surprising that most <strong>plastic</strong>s<br />

failed in <str<strong>on</strong>g>tests</str<strong>on</strong>g> for resistance to termites (13-<br />

16). Nevertheless, differences exist between<br />

different <strong>plastic</strong>s and their susceptibility to<br />

termite attack. C<strong>on</strong>densati<strong>on</strong>-<strong>plastic</strong>s like<br />

polyesters appear more resistant than additi<strong>on</strong><strong>plastic</strong>s<br />

like polyethylene, polystyrene and<br />

polyurethane (13). However, it is not <strong>on</strong>ly the<br />

mechanical hardness of <strong>plastic</strong>s that characterises<br />

durability against termite attack, the surface<br />

structure is just as important. Smooth, even<br />

levelled surfaces, are more likely to prevent<br />

termite attack, but the smallest cracks and<br />

crevices or ruffled surfaces and edges provide<br />

immediate access for termite mandibles. The<br />

same holds true for WPCs. Once the surface<br />

is broken, destructi<strong>on</strong> is <strong>on</strong>ly a matter of time<br />

and termite populati<strong>on</strong> density, unless the<br />

material is protected by either an effective<br />

termiticide or a repellent that prevents c<strong>on</strong>tinuous<br />

feeding. Although it was shown that dry<strong>wood</strong><br />

termites are capable of attacking <strong>plastic</strong>s (13),<br />

it is c<strong>on</strong>sidered unlikely that this group of<br />

Wood/<strong>plastic</strong><br />

<strong>composites</strong> (WPC) are a<br />

fairly new category of<br />

materials <strong>on</strong> the market.<br />

The authors point out<br />

biological procedures to<br />

characterise and specify<br />

different WPC-materials.<br />

While moisture is<br />

essential for growths<br />

of algae and fungi,<br />

termites can also attack<br />

dry materials.<br />

Whether biocides<br />

are needed for<br />

protecti<strong>on</strong> of a materials<br />

depends<br />

<strong>on</strong> the envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

it will be exposed to<br />

during its use.<br />

termites would infest <strong>plastic</strong>s to establish col<strong>on</strong>ies as they do<br />

in pure <strong>wood</strong>en structures. For WPCs this still needs to be<br />

dem<strong>on</strong>strated.<br />

USE CLASSES FOR WOODEN MATERIALS<br />

Before deciding <strong>on</strong> measures to protect the WPC it is important<br />

to decide where the material has to perform and to what<br />

envir<strong>on</strong>ment it will be exposed. In the field of <strong>wood</strong> protecti<strong>on</strong>,<br />

the definiti<strong>on</strong> of use classes (former hazard<br />

classes) was found to be useful and could now<br />

also be applied to identify the intended use for<br />

WPC-materials (17, 18). These use classes<br />

cover the following general service situati<strong>on</strong>s:<br />

Use class 1 for interior and covered, use class<br />

2 for interior and not covered, use class 3 for<br />

exterior above ground, use class 4 for exterior<br />

in the ground or fresh water and use class 5<br />

for use in salt water. Some minor subdivisi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

in the use classes may occur.<br />

TESTING OF WPCS FOR BIOLOGICAL<br />

DURABILITY<br />

In Europe, CEN with its Technical Committee<br />

249, Working Group 13, has been working <strong>on</strong><br />

laboratory methods to characterise WPCs since<br />

2003. Chapter 8.6 of the technical specificati<strong>on</strong><br />

TS 15534-1released in 2006, “Resistance against<br />

biological agents” (19), deals with the different<br />

forms of microbiological decay (Annex C: termites,<br />

Annex D: <strong>wood</strong> destroying basidiomycetes,<br />

Annex E: soft rotting micro-fungi, Annex F:<br />

discolouring micro-fungi and algae).<br />

Biocides

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!