Family Medicine

U8UQp U8UQp

dracinthiagep
from dracinthiagep More from this publisher
06.11.2015 Views

World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 Carlos Brotons MD, PhD cbrotons@eapsardenya.cat 21 – Prevention and Health Promotion in Clinical Practice Carlos Brotons MD, PhD, on behalf of EUROPREV (European network for prevention and health promotion in GP/FM) Primary health care is a suitable setting for interventions to identify and reduce behavioural risks factors and recommend preventive activities (including immunisations, screening for cardiovascular risk factors and cancer, and counselling). A survey carried out in the year 2000 among 2082 GPs from eleven European countries showed that significant gaps persist between GPs' knowledge and their practice in the use of evidence-based recommendations for health promotion and disease prevention in primary care (1). To complement this GPs’ survey, and in order to explore patients’ views and beliefs on the importance of lifestyle and preventive interventions, another survey was carried out in the year 2008-2009, involving 7947 patients from 22 European countries (2). The results of this survey showed that alcohol drinkers do not see, or fail to admit, that alcohol use is a risky habit that needs to be modified. Less than one third of risky drinkers would like to receive advice concerning alcohol intake from their GPs. It seems that patients are much more conscious about the risk of tobacco, unhealthy diet or sedentary lifestyle than the risk of alcohol. Also, patients reported that they had received less advice (in a discussion initiated by GPs) for alcohol than for tobacco, diet and physical exercise. In another study done in Sweden, only 18% of patients reported that they had received advice at least in one area, with a four-fold variation between the most common type of advice (exercise in 16%) and the rarest type (alcohol in 5%) (3). The view of patients that GPs initiated a discussion on smoking in 63% of cases, eating habits (59% of cases), and physical activity (55%) shows some correlation with the views of GPs in Europe as surveyed in 2000 (1). At that time, GPs declared that they advised smokers to quit in 61 – 71% of cases, and counselled overweight and sedentary patients in 59 – 62% and 54 – 57% of cases respectively. However, in this study patients identified as risky drinkers said that their GPs had only initiated a discussion regarding their alcohol use in 42% while the 2082 doctors participating said they would advise heavy drinkers to reduce consumption in 57 – 64% of cases. Thus while patients and doctors seem to agree regarding the frequency of their discussions on smoking, healthy eating/weight and physical activity, patients seem to have a more negative viewpoint on how often doctors give advice on alcohol use. Table shows the views of patients regarding optimal interval for screening for cardiovascular risk factors and cancer and for vaccination. More than 80% of women think they should be checked for cervical cancer yearly or every two years. However, revised guidelines recommend Pap test screening every three years for women age 30 and older (4). These findings reflect overuse of Pap test screening, which is expensive for the health care system and may result in unnecessary follow-up testing and increased risk for colposcopy-associated illnesses and adverse birth outcomes, as well as distress for patients (5). The survey also showed that 43% of women aged 30-49 thought that screening for breast cancer should be done 70

World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 yearly or more often and that 30% felt that screening should take place every two years. This recommendation is a direct challenge to the strong message from massive campaigns aimed at women in some countries over the last two decades advising they undergo yearly screening starting at age 40, and this is also reflected in the results of our study. Other studies have also found that opportunistic mammography screening in excess of the recommendation is common and persists despite explicit advice about recommended screening frequency (6). Health professionals should be conversant with the recommended testing intervals for cardiovascular risk factors and for cancer screening in order to better educate patients in the judicious use of such tests. Table. Views of patients regarding the optimal interval for screening for cardiovascular risks factors and cancer, and for vaccination. How often do you think it would be appropriate to have…,% (95% CI) Not at all I don't know Yearly or more often Every 2 years Every 3 years Less often than every 3 years Blood pressure check (n=5085) 1 1.2% (0.8-1.7) 15.5% (13.7-19.7) 75.1% (72.0-78.0) 5.2% (4.3-6.3) 1.1% (0.7-1.7) 0.9% (0.5-1.6) Blood sugar check (n=6865) 2 1.1% (0.8-1.6) 16.7% (14.5-19.3) 66.0% (63.3-68.7) 12.4% (10.9-13.9) 2.3% (1.7-3.0) 1.5% (1.1-2.2) Blood cholesterol check (n=5805) 3 1.3% (0.9-1.8) 17.5% (14.8-20.5) 62.6% (59.6-65.5) 14.3% (12.5-16.3) 2.7% (2.1-3.4) 1.7% (1.2-2.5) Flu vaccination (65 years old and over) (n=928) 14.4% (10.9-18.7) 15.2% (11.7-19.5) 67.6% (61.1-73.5) 2.0% (1.0-3.7) 0.6% (0.2-2.4) 0.2% (0.0-1.1) Cervical smear test (only women) (n=4007) 4 1.9% (1.2-2.8) 8.5% (7.1-10.3) 58.2% (54.9-61.5) 23.3% (20.8-26.0) 5.9% (4.6-7.6) 2.2% (1.6-2.9) Mammogram (only women) (n=3650) 5 30-49 years (n=1919) 1.4% (0.7-2.8) 14.4% (12.0-17.1) 43.1% (38.9-47.4) 29.7% (26.5-33.3) 6.6% (5.0-8.7) 4.8% (3.5-6.5) 50 years or more (n=1731) 2.8% (1.7-4.5) 8.2% (6.2-10.6) 41.7% (38.3-45.2) 40.6% (37.1-44.2) 4.5% (3.2-6.1) 2.3% (1.5-3.6) 1 Excluding patients diagnosed with high blood pressure 2 Excluding patients diagnosed with high blood glucose 3 Excluding patients diagnosed with high blood cholesterol 4 Excluding women diagnosed with cervical cancer 5 Excluding women diagnosed with breast cancer Take home messages A high proportion of patients attending primary care with unhealthy lifestyles (especially risky drinkers) do not perceive the need to change their habits. Half the patients reported not having had any discussion on healthy lifestyles with their GPs. Patients overestimate their need to be screened for cardiovascular risk factors and for cancer. Further studies are needed to investigate the reasons behind these perceptions so that suitable strategies may be devised to tackle them. Health professionals should be conversant with the recommended testing intervals for cardiovascular risk factors and for screening for cancer in order to better educate patients in the judicious use of such tests. 71

World Book of <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong> – European Edition 2015<br />

yearly or more often and that 30% felt that screening should take place every two years. This recommendation is a<br />

direct challenge to the strong message from massive campaigns aimed at women in some countries over the last two<br />

decades advising they undergo yearly screening starting at age 40, and this is also reflected in the results of our study.<br />

Other studies have also found that opportunistic mammography screening in excess of the recommendation is<br />

common and persists despite explicit advice about recommended screening frequency (6).<br />

Health professionals should be conversant with the recommended testing intervals for cardiovascular risk factors and<br />

for cancer screening in order to better educate patients in the judicious use of such tests.<br />

Table. Views of patients regarding the optimal interval for screening for cardiovascular risks factors and cancer, and<br />

for vaccination.<br />

How often do you think<br />

it would be appropriate<br />

to have…,% (95% CI)<br />

Not at all I don't know Yearly or<br />

more often<br />

Every 2<br />

years<br />

Every 3<br />

years<br />

Less often<br />

than every 3<br />

years<br />

Blood pressure check<br />

(n=5085) 1<br />

1.2%<br />

(0.8-1.7)<br />

15.5%<br />

(13.7-19.7)<br />

75.1%<br />

(72.0-78.0)<br />

5.2%<br />

(4.3-6.3)<br />

1.1%<br />

(0.7-1.7)<br />

0.9%<br />

(0.5-1.6)<br />

Blood sugar check<br />

(n=6865) 2<br />

1.1%<br />

(0.8-1.6)<br />

16.7%<br />

(14.5-19.3)<br />

66.0%<br />

(63.3-68.7)<br />

12.4%<br />

(10.9-13.9)<br />

2.3%<br />

(1.7-3.0)<br />

1.5%<br />

(1.1-2.2)<br />

Blood cholesterol check<br />

(n=5805) 3<br />

1.3%<br />

(0.9-1.8)<br />

17.5%<br />

(14.8-20.5)<br />

62.6%<br />

(59.6-65.5)<br />

14.3%<br />

(12.5-16.3)<br />

2.7%<br />

(2.1-3.4)<br />

1.7%<br />

(1.2-2.5)<br />

Flu vaccination (65<br />

years old and over)<br />

(n=928)<br />

14.4%<br />

(10.9-18.7)<br />

15.2%<br />

(11.7-19.5)<br />

67.6%<br />

(61.1-73.5)<br />

2.0%<br />

(1.0-3.7)<br />

0.6%<br />

(0.2-2.4)<br />

0.2%<br />

(0.0-1.1)<br />

Cervical smear test<br />

(only women) (n=4007)<br />

4<br />

1.9%<br />

(1.2-2.8)<br />

8.5%<br />

(7.1-10.3)<br />

58.2%<br />

(54.9-61.5)<br />

23.3%<br />

(20.8-26.0)<br />

5.9%<br />

(4.6-7.6)<br />

2.2%<br />

(1.6-2.9)<br />

Mammogram (only women) (n=3650) 5<br />

30-49 years (n=1919)<br />

1.4%<br />

(0.7-2.8)<br />

14.4%<br />

(12.0-17.1)<br />

43.1%<br />

(38.9-47.4)<br />

29.7%<br />

(26.5-33.3)<br />

6.6%<br />

(5.0-8.7)<br />

4.8%<br />

(3.5-6.5)<br />

50 years or more<br />

(n=1731)<br />

2.8%<br />

(1.7-4.5)<br />

8.2%<br />

(6.2-10.6)<br />

41.7%<br />

(38.3-45.2)<br />

40.6%<br />

(37.1-44.2)<br />

4.5%<br />

(3.2-6.1)<br />

2.3%<br />

(1.5-3.6)<br />

1 Excluding patients diagnosed with high blood pressure<br />

2 Excluding patients diagnosed with high blood glucose<br />

3 Excluding patients diagnosed with high blood cholesterol<br />

4 Excluding women diagnosed with cervical cancer<br />

5 Excluding women diagnosed with breast cancer<br />

Take home messages<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

A high proportion of patients attending primary care with unhealthy lifestyles<br />

(especially risky drinkers) do not perceive the need to change their habits.<br />

Half the patients reported not having had any discussion on healthy lifestyles with their GPs.<br />

Patients overestimate their need to be screened for cardiovascular risk factors and for cancer.<br />

Further studies are needed to investigate the reasons behind these perceptions so that suitable strategies<br />

may be devised to tackle them.<br />

Health professionals should be conversant with the recommended testing intervals for cardiovascular risk<br />

factors and for screening for cancer in order to better educate patients in the judicious use of such tests.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!