Family Medicine
U8UQp U8UQp
References World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Team Wilcock P, Campion-Smith C, Elston S. Practice Professional Development Planning - A guide for primary care. Oxon: Radclife Medical Press; 2003. Attwood M, Curtis A, Pitts J, While R. Professional Development: A Guide for Primary Care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing; 2005. NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement and Academy of Medical Royal Colleges. Medical Leadership Competency Framework, 3rd edition. Coventry: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2010. Makela M, Booth B, Roberts R, eds. Family Doctors’ Journey to Quality. Helsinki: Stakes National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health; 2001. Elwyn G. Professional and practice development plans for primary care. Editorial. BMJ 1998, 316:1619-20. Elwyn G, Hocking P: Organisational development in general practice: lessons from practice and professional development plans (PPDPs). BMC Family Practice 2000, 1:2-. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, Darzi A, Bell D, Reed JE. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Quality & Safety 2014, 23(4): 290–298. 236
World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 Joachim Szecsenyi, MD MSc Joachim.Szecsenyi@med.uni-heidelberg.de 77 – European Practice Assessment (EPA): Practice Assessment and Quality Management With Indicators That Matter Joachim Szecsenyi, MD, MSc Professor of General Practice University of Heidelberg Hospital Dept. of General Practice and Health Services Research Heidelberg, Germany Quality management systems within healthcare aim to improve health outcomes, patient experiences, accessibility and efficiency of service delivery as well as the job satisfaction of all staff involved. EPA is an easy to use and self-explanatory system which can be used without specific training in quality management. With its educative and reflective approach, it has a high impact on the change of performance. Objectives The main objective of EPA is to develop an internationally validated tool for quality management for healthcare providers. It aims at enabling healthcare providers to assess and improve the quality of care they provide. Quality indicators Quality indicators play an important role in achieving these objectives. They are measurable elements of performance that can be used to assess the quality of care. Their development is based on evidence or consensus and they close the gap between expert knowledge and routine daily practice. Based on indicators, quality improvement starts with measurement according to the principle that you cannot change what you cannot measure. In order to assess the quality of care, indicators need to be well defined. They should be smart (specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and time-bound), valid, objective, and sensitive. To assess the quality of care in general practice, indicators were developed that are comprehensive and relevant to general practice; to assure this, general practitioners and experienced researchers were closely involved in the development process. The current EPA version contains more than 200 quality indicators covering a wide range of quality issues relevant for practice management across Europe. Quality indicators are arranged thematically in 34 dimensions and 5 overarching domains covering all important aspects of practice management, like quality and safety, people, infrastructure, information and finances. International development The indicators used within EPA for general practice were developed in an international study in Germany funded by the Bertelsmann Foundation, Germany. Various countries like Switzerland, Austria, France, Great Britain, Italy, Slovenia and Israel took part in the project. The set of indicators was piloted in 50 general practices for each participating country. National implementation of EPA nowadays lies with the responsibility of the individual countries. Methodology 237
- Page 185 and 186: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 187 and 188: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 189 and 190: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 191 and 192: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 193 and 194: Original abstract World Book of Fam
- Page 195 and 196: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 197 and 198: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 199 and 200: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 201 and 202: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 203 and 204: Take home messages World Book of
- Page 205 and 206: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 207 and 208: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 209 and 210: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 211 and 212: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 213 and 214: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 215 and 216: References World Book of Family Med
- Page 217 and 218: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 219 and 220: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 221 and 222: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 223 and 224: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 225 and 226: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 227 and 228: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 229 and 230: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 231 and 232: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 233 and 234: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 235: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 239 and 240: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 241 and 242: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 243 and 244: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 245 and 246: References World Book of Family Med
- Page 247 and 248: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 249 and 250: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 251 and 252: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 253 and 254: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 255 and 256: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 257 and 258: References World Book of Family Med
- Page 259 and 260: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 261 and 262: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 263 and 264: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 265 and 266: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 267 and 268: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 269 and 270: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 271 and 272: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 273 and 274: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 275 and 276: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 277 and 278: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 279 and 280: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 281 and 282: References World Book of Family Med
- Page 283 and 284: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 285 and 286: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
World Book of <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong> – European Edition 2015<br />
Joachim Szecsenyi, MD MSc<br />
Joachim.Szecsenyi@med.uni-heidelberg.de<br />
77 – European Practice Assessment (EPA): Practice Assessment<br />
and Quality Management With Indicators That Matter<br />
Joachim Szecsenyi, MD, MSc<br />
Professor of General Practice<br />
University of Heidelberg Hospital<br />
Dept. of General Practice and<br />
Health Services Research<br />
Heidelberg, Germany<br />
Quality management systems within healthcare aim to improve health outcomes,<br />
patient experiences, accessibility and efficiency of service delivery as well as the job<br />
satisfaction of all staff involved. EPA is an easy to use and self-explanatory system<br />
which can be used without specific training in quality management. With its educative<br />
and reflective approach, it has a high impact on the change of performance.<br />
Objectives<br />
The main objective of EPA is to develop an internationally validated tool for quality<br />
management for healthcare providers. It aims at enabling healthcare providers to<br />
assess and improve the quality of care they provide.<br />
Quality indicators<br />
Quality indicators play an important role in achieving these objectives. They are<br />
measurable elements of performance that can be used to assess the quality of care.<br />
Their development is based on evidence or consensus and they close the gap<br />
between expert knowledge and routine daily practice. Based on indicators, quality<br />
improvement starts with measurement according to the principle that you cannot<br />
change what you cannot measure. In order to assess the quality of care, indicators<br />
need to be well defined. They should be smart (specific, measurable, achievable,<br />
relevant and time-bound), valid, objective, and sensitive.<br />
To assess the quality of care in general practice, indicators were developed that are<br />
comprehensive and relevant to general practice; to assure this, general practitioners<br />
and experienced researchers were closely involved in the development process. The<br />
current EPA version contains more than 200 quality indicators covering a wide range<br />
of quality issues relevant for practice management across Europe. Quality indicators<br />
are arranged thematically in 34 dimensions and 5 overarching domains covering all<br />
important aspects of practice management, like quality and safety, people,<br />
infrastructure, information and finances.<br />
International development<br />
The indicators used within EPA for general practice were developed in an<br />
international study in Germany funded by the Bertelsmann Foundation, Germany.<br />
Various countries like Switzerland, Austria, France, Great Britain, Italy, Slovenia and<br />
Israel took part in the project. The set of indicators was piloted in 50 general practices<br />
for each participating country. National implementation of EPA nowadays lies with the<br />
responsibility of the individual countries.<br />
Methodology<br />
237