Family Medicine
U8UQp U8UQp
World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 Nowadays, clinicians are under pressure by their governments and the public to motivate their patients to adopt healthy behaviours. Their professional leaders may even stress the suitability of the setting for prevention by getting patients to change. Among busy clinicians already struggling with the narrow curative task this often results in feelings of guilt. The simple question ‘Have you ever tried to [give up smoking, stop drinking, exercise more, take your tablets regularly etc.]?’ is often sufficient to understand where the patient is in the process (hopefully) of leading to healthier behaviour. There is no need to use lengthy questionnaires although standardised instruments have been developed for research purposes. The practical steps of taking a history and suggesting the next move are easy to learn. The longer one tries, the more one realises that “Stages of Change“ is an attitude rather than a cookbook-like prescription. Ideally, the patient is given room to identify opportunities and barriers himself and to suggest the next step. In primary care, occasions are plentiful, they range from the most obvious addictive behaviours to lack of exercise and poor diet. Discussions regarding taking medicines regularly or attending for chronic disease monitoring may also benefit from this approach. Against this background the “Stages of Change“ approach can be likened to an internal gatekeeper. It can ease the tension between practice resources, with time being the most valuable, and the needs of the patient. “Stages of Change” has also been of tremendous benefit in implementing patient centred communication strategies in primary care. Perhaps the most important and damaging risk factors for chronic diseases are behavioural. The moral overtones arising from this knowledge have often put a heavy strain on the doctor-patient relationship. Payment being linked to behavioural outcomes of care has only made matters worse. “Stages of Change” has helped GPs prioritise their tasks, avoid unnecessary guilt and maintain their feelings of respect for their patients. Take Home Messages Before you suggest behavioural change to your patient, stop and ask whether he / she has already tried [to stop smoking, have more exercise, take his / her tablets regularly etc.]. The answer will help you decide whether the patient is ready or not. Ideally, the patients formulates him / herself what the next step should be. Waiting is perfectly OK, but try to address the issue later. Original Abstract http://www.woncaeurope.org/content/7-pa-stages-behavioural-change-helpful-concept-gps References 1. Miller WR. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. New York: Guildford; 1991. 2. Prochaska, JO; Butterworth, S; Redding, CA; Burden, V; Perrin, N; Leo, M; Flaherty-Robb, M; Prochaska, JM. Initial efficacy of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI's with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion. Prev Med 2008 Mar;46(3):226–31. 3. Riemsma, RP; Pattenden, J; Bridle, C; Sowden, AJ; Mather, L; Watt, IS; Walker, A. Systematic review of the effectiveness of stage based interventions to promote smoking cessation. BMJ 2003 May 31;326(7400):1175–7. 4. West R, Sohal T. "Catastrophic" pathways to smoking cessation: findings from a national survey. BMJ. 2006 Feb 25;332(7539):458-60. 5. Littell, JH; Girvin, H. Stages of change. A critique. Behav Modif 2002 Apr;26(2):223–73 6. Rollnick S et al. Health Behavior Change. A Guide for Practitioners. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1999 156
World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 Carl Steylaerts, MD carl.steylaerts@skynet.be 51 – Future and Innovations in Family Medicine – in 2065 Carl Steylaerts, MD Honorary Treasurer WONCA Europe Family Doctor, Belgium Dr Monty Kent Hughes, the very first WONCA president, said in 1972: “the future of our professional discipline will depend on our ability to work together in the service of humanity.” (1) Fast forward to 2065 Who would have thought that the apparently least developed specialization, family medicine, would eventually end up as the only one? Cardiologists? There are still three in Europe. Emeriti, they are no longer active. Gynaecologists? None. No longer necessary since the breakthrough in cloning. Paediatricians? All retrained to avatarologues. Surgeons? Obsolete after the introduction of growing graphene and nanobots which turn every cancer cell in apoptosis. Falls and accidents have been eradicated: we use superconductivity to move now. What bliss! Graphene, delineating and replacing the vessel wall, causing no more obstructions or bleeding, was a fine piece of nanotechnology. Extended life span by at least 200 years. Moreover, everything that is somewhat based on medical technology is obsolete today. Technique killed technique. But family medicine has remained. Because of demand. And thanks to symphonic thinking, our trade has survived. We were already strong through our holistic thinking, but this additional thinking step turned out to be the right one. General Practice, General Practitioner, Family Medicine, Family Physicians ... With the putting in motion of a quality train entitled "Validation of increase", the formerly flat and uninspiring trail of a GP career was transformed into an inspiring one. From GP to Personal Doctor to Family Doctor. A first master after six years, second master after 9 years, third master after 12 years, and so on every 3 years, the family physician trained in the complex game of families, relationships and interactions with the new technology and unhealthy environment, proved to be just what the future needed: not more technology, but doctors trained in the inclusive approach of more or less healthy people and their relationships. Because despite all the technological advances, 80% of people remained just that - people with their facts and failures, their joys and wishes and their hopes still to make it (2). Family Doctor Art has remained a versatile specialty, with an eye for the totality, continuity, quality, and equality. As demanded. How did family medicine become so successful? 157
- Page 105 and 106: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 107 and 108: References World Book of Family Med
- Page 109 and 110: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 111 and 112: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 113 and 114: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 115 and 116: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 117 and 118: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 119 and 120: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 121 and 122: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 123 and 124: Original Abstract World Book of Fam
- Page 125 and 126: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 127 and 128: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 129 and 130: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 131 and 132: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 133 and 134: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 135 and 136: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 137 and 138: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 139 and 140: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 141 and 142: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 143 and 144: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 145 and 146: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 147 and 148: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 149 and 150: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 151 and 152: References World Book of Family Med
- Page 153 and 154: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 155: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 159 and 160: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 161 and 162: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 163 and 164: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 165 and 166: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 167 and 168: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 169 and 170: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 171 and 172: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 173 and 174: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 175 and 176: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 177 and 178: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 179 and 180: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 181 and 182: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 183 and 184: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 185 and 186: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 187 and 188: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 189 and 190: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 191 and 192: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 193 and 194: Original abstract World Book of Fam
- Page 195 and 196: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 197 and 198: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 199 and 200: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 201 and 202: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 203 and 204: Take home messages World Book of
- Page 205 and 206: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
World Book of <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong> – European Edition 2015<br />
Nowadays, clinicians are under pressure by their governments and the public to motivate their patients to adopt<br />
healthy behaviours. Their professional leaders may even stress the suitability of the setting for prevention by getting<br />
patients to change. Among busy clinicians already struggling with the narrow curative task this often results in feelings<br />
of guilt.<br />
The simple question ‘Have you ever tried to [give up smoking, stop drinking, exercise more, take your tablets regularly<br />
etc.]?’ is often sufficient to understand where the patient is in the process (hopefully) of leading to healthier<br />
behaviour. There is no need to use lengthy questionnaires although standardised instruments have been developed for<br />
research purposes. The practical steps of taking a history and suggesting the next move are easy to learn. The longer<br />
one tries, the more one realises that “Stages of Change“ is an attitude rather than a cookbook-like prescription. Ideally,<br />
the patient is given room to identify opportunities and barriers himself and to suggest the next step. In primary care,<br />
occasions are plentiful, they range from the most obvious addictive behaviours to lack of exercise and poor diet.<br />
Discussions regarding taking medicines regularly or attending for chronic disease monitoring may also benefit from this<br />
approach.<br />
Against this background the “Stages of Change“ approach can be likened to an internal gatekeeper. It can ease the<br />
tension between practice resources, with time being the most valuable, and the needs of the patient. “Stages of<br />
Change” has also been of tremendous benefit in implementing patient centred communication strategies in primary<br />
care.<br />
Perhaps the most important and damaging risk factors for chronic diseases are behavioural. The moral overtones<br />
arising from this knowledge have often put a heavy strain on the doctor-patient relationship. Payment being linked to<br />
behavioural outcomes of care has only made matters worse. “Stages of Change” has helped GPs prioritise their tasks,<br />
avoid unnecessary guilt and maintain their feelings of respect for their patients.<br />
Take Home Messages<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Before you suggest behavioural change to your patient, stop and ask whether he / she has already tried [to<br />
stop smoking, have more exercise, take his / her tablets regularly etc.].<br />
The answer will help you decide whether the patient is ready or not.<br />
Ideally, the patients formulates him / herself what the next step should be. Waiting is perfectly OK, but try to<br />
address the issue later.<br />
Original Abstract<br />
http://www.woncaeurope.org/content/7-pa-stages-behavioural-change-helpful-concept-gps<br />
References<br />
1. Miller WR. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People to Change Addictive Behavior. New York: Guildford; 1991.<br />
2. Prochaska, JO; Butterworth, S; Redding, CA; Burden, V; Perrin, N; Leo, M; Flaherty-Robb, M; Prochaska, JM. Initial efficacy<br />
of MI, TTM tailoring and HRI's with multiple behaviors for employee health promotion. Prev Med 2008 Mar;46(3):226–31.<br />
3. Riemsma, RP; Pattenden, J; Bridle, C; Sowden, AJ; Mather, L; Watt, IS; Walker, A. Systematic review of the effectiveness of<br />
stage based interventions to promote smoking cessation. BMJ 2003 May 31;326(7400):1175–7.<br />
4. West R, Sohal T. "Catastrophic" pathways to smoking cessation: findings from a national survey. BMJ. 2006 Feb<br />
25;332(7539):458-60.<br />
5. Littell, JH; Girvin, H. Stages of change. A critique. Behav Modif 2002 Apr;26(2):223–73<br />
6. Rollnick S et al. Health Behavior Change. A Guide for Practitioners. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1999<br />
156