Family Medicine
U8UQp U8UQp
World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 Justin Allen FRCGP justinallen@btinternet.com 34 – How the UK Discovered Europe Justin Allen FRCGP President of EURACT 2001 - 2005 Background In the United Kingdom over the last 15 years arrangements for the provision of specialty training for general practice and its supervision have undergone several reorganisations, and one of the major changes has been the development of a general practice curriculum. Specialty training for general practice lasted for three years, in six month training posts, two years in hospital and one year in an approved general practice placement. It may surprise you to know that until 2005 there was no comprehensive GP curriculum in the UK. Although there was high quality practice-based teaching, the governance and supervision arrangements were fragmented and inconsistent. The approval of hospital posts for GP training was vested in Royal College of the specialty concerned rather than the general practice college. The Joint Committee on Postgraduate Training for General Practice (JCPTGP), a statutory committee of the RCGP and the GP Committee of the British Medical Association (BMA) was responsible for approving general practice trainers, training placements and the issue of certificates of satisfactory completion of the training programme. The Joint Committee on Postgraduate Training for General Practice (JCPTGP), a statutory committee of the RCGP and the GP Committee of the British Medical Association; this committee was responsible for approving general practice trainers, training placements and the issue of certificates of satisfactory completion of training, given by an approved trainer. To add to this chaotic mix, the supervision of hospital training for GPs rested with the specialty college concerned. All medical colleges except general practice were supervised by a different national body, the Specialty Training Authority (STA). All these bodies were responsible to the overarching supervisory body in the UK, the General Medical Council (GMC). The GMC was also separately responsible for the undergraduate curriculum and performance matters of working doctors. As a result of some major governance issues in the UK involving patient harm (for example Harold Shipman) the government decided that the whole governance process was in need of reform, to avoid duplication and possible confusion of roles and responsibilities, not helped by the number of acronyms! The STA and JCPTGP were to be abolished and replaced by a single body, the Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board. One of the strangest anomalies of the former system was that the RCGP had a very good final assessment exam but this was not approved for use as the national outcome assessment and a different system of assessment ran in parallel. 108
World Book of Family Medicine – European Edition 2015 My Input In 2005 the RCGP was given the responsibility for developing a national curriculum for GP training, including assessment. It is at this point that I joined in the fun, having been invited to join the RCGP curriculum group, as I had some knowledge of work going on in Europe on curriculum development. The curriculum group was running a symposium on curriculum development at a WONCA conference entitled: “Developing a National Curriculum for the Education and Training of General Practitioners in the United Kingdom” This symposium looked at the process the Royal College curriculum group were undertaking in designing a new GP curriculum. The RCGP prides itself on the quality of its work and set about its task with its customary academic rigour and energy; it had already started this process when I joined, having started a programme of focus groups, trainee and educator surveys, presentations and workshops at national and international meetings. It had commissioned a literature review and was starting a process of considering other general practice curriculum models that had been developed elsewhere – one from the Oxford region in the UK, and nine from other countries: Australia, Canada, Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain and the USA. The observant will have noticed that four of the countries are native English speakers and that the remainder are from the WONCA European region (Ireland fits both categories). Even so the RCGP group were having difficulties in finding a good match for a comprehensive training curriculum for GPs in the National Health Service. As a newcomer to the group I was puzzled (I was often puzzled anyway). The Royal College of General Practitioners was an active member of WONCA Europe and its network organisations which had produced the 2005 European Definition (1) which contained a list of the core competences required to be a GP. EURACT had worked further and developed the European Definition into its Education Agenda (2). This document developed the list of competences into a full blown curriculum statement for European general practice ready for adaptation to the needs of individual countries. But the College did not appear to have considered the European Definition or the Educational Agenda. As we are part of the European Union and as a college have worked hard with our WONCA Europe colleagues, I suggested to the group that we should consider these models. This they did and discovered that with some modifications these documents would be a good basis for the new UK curriculum. With very little dissent, which was possibly related to the fact that the British only speak one language (and that rather badly) the WONCA definition, with its six core competences and three essential features became the basis for the UK curriculum in 2005, and remains so today. The EURACT Educational Agenda is the basis of the core curriculum statement “Being A GP”, and all of the RCGP curriculum statements use the six core competences and three essential features - see for yourself on the RCGP curriculum web site: http://www.rcgp.org.uk/training-exams/gp-curriculum-overview.aspx . Take Home messages Until 2005 there was no comprehensive national GP curriculum in the UK. Governance of GP training was by a number of bodies, with overlapping roles. GP and hospital training were supervised by different organisations. The national GP curriculum in the UK has now been developed, and is based on the WONCA Definition of General Practice and the EURACT Educational Agenda. Original Abstract http://www.woncaeurope.org/content/3553-developing-national-curriculum-education-and-training-general-practitioners-united References 1. The European Definition of General Practice/Family Medicine 2005 Edition http://www.woncaeurope.org/sites/default/files/documents/Definition%202nd%20ed%202005.pdf (accessed 19/12/14) 2. The Educational Agenda 2006 ed. J.Heyrman, Leuven, http://www.euract.eu/official-documents/finish/3-official-documents/93-euract-educational-agenda (accessed 19/12/14) 109
- Page 57 and 58: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 59 and 60: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 61 and 62: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 63 and 64: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 65 and 66: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 67 and 68: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 69 and 70: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 71 and 72: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 73 and 74: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 75 and 76: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 77 and 78: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 79 and 80: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 81 and 82: Original abstract World Book of Fam
- Page 83 and 84: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 85 and 86: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 87 and 88: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 89 and 90: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 91 and 92: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 93 and 94: Original Abstract World Book of Fam
- Page 95 and 96: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 97 and 98: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 99 and 100: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 101 and 102: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 103 and 104: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 105 and 106: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 107: References World Book of Family Med
- Page 111 and 112: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 113 and 114: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 115 and 116: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 117 and 118: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 119 and 120: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 121 and 122: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 123 and 124: Original Abstract World Book of Fam
- Page 125 and 126: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 127 and 128: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 129 and 130: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 131 and 132: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 133 and 134: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 135 and 136: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 137 and 138: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 139 and 140: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 141 and 142: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 143 and 144: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 145 and 146: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 147 and 148: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 149 and 150: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 151 and 152: References World Book of Family Med
- Page 153 and 154: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 155 and 156: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
- Page 157 and 158: World Book of Family Medicine - Eur
World Book of <strong>Family</strong> <strong>Medicine</strong> – European Edition 2015<br />
Justin Allen FRCGP<br />
justinallen@btinternet.com<br />
34 – How the UK Discovered Europe<br />
Justin Allen FRCGP<br />
President of EURACT 2001 - 2005<br />
Background<br />
In the United Kingdom over the last 15 years arrangements for the provision of<br />
specialty training for general practice and its supervision have undergone several<br />
reorganisations, and one of the major changes has been the development of a<br />
general practice curriculum. Specialty training for general practice lasted for three<br />
years, in six month training posts, two years in hospital and one year in an approved<br />
general practice placement.<br />
It may surprise you to know that until 2005 there was no comprehensive GP<br />
curriculum in the UK. Although there was high quality practice-based teaching, the<br />
governance and supervision arrangements were fragmented and inconsistent. The<br />
approval of hospital posts for GP training was vested in Royal College of the specialty<br />
concerned rather than the general practice college. The Joint Committee on<br />
Postgraduate Training for General Practice (JCPTGP), a statutory committee of the<br />
RCGP and the GP Committee of the British Medical Association (BMA) was<br />
responsible for approving general practice trainers, training placements and the issue<br />
of certificates of satisfactory completion of the training programme.<br />
The Joint Committee on Postgraduate Training for General Practice (JCPTGP), a<br />
statutory committee of the RCGP and the GP Committee of the British Medical<br />
Association; this committee was responsible for approving general practice trainers,<br />
training placements and the issue of certificates of satisfactory completion of training,<br />
given by an approved trainer. To add to this chaotic mix, the supervision of hospital<br />
training for GPs rested with the specialty college concerned. All medical colleges<br />
except general practice were supervised by a different national body, the Specialty<br />
Training Authority (STA). All these bodies were responsible to the overarching<br />
supervisory body in the UK, the General Medical Council (GMC). The GMC was also<br />
separately responsible for the undergraduate curriculum and performance matters of<br />
working doctors.<br />
As a result of some major governance issues in the UK involving patient harm (for<br />
example Harold Shipman) the government decided that the whole governance<br />
process was in need of reform, to avoid duplication and possible confusion of roles<br />
and responsibilities, not helped by the number of acronyms! The STA and JCPTGP<br />
were to be abolished and replaced by a single body, the Postgraduate Medical<br />
Education and Training Board.<br />
One of the strangest anomalies of the former system was that the RCGP had a very<br />
good final assessment exam but this was not approved for use as the national<br />
outcome assessment and a different system of assessment ran in parallel.<br />
108