Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment
cahe_bibliography
cahe_bibliography
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
49<br />
Design Approaches and Philosophies<br />
context and to preserve and revitalize <strong>the</strong>m. The author reviews projects<br />
and identifies that <strong>the</strong> contrast of old and new is preferred and adopted<br />
over <strong>the</strong> imitation approach. He provides a number of European examples<br />
to illustrate this concept. The author also sees <strong>the</strong> contrast approach<br />
as parasitical—each old and new part need<strong>in</strong>g each o<strong>the</strong>r to give <strong>the</strong><br />
build<strong>in</strong>g def<strong>in</strong>ition and legibility.<br />
• In “Celebration of Complementary <strong>Architecture</strong>” (pp. 18–23), Wilfred<br />
Wang discusses how additions and new <strong>in</strong>sertions are perceived <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
architectural discourse. The author discusses “complementary architectures”<br />
where new and old elements are visually agreeable and <strong>in</strong> dialogue,<br />
versus “sole object architectures” that he considers to be<br />
dom<strong>in</strong>ant <strong>in</strong> media representations of architecture, myopic and isolated.<br />
He uses several European examples of 20th-century modern architects<br />
to illustrate <strong>the</strong> differences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se design approaches.<br />
• In “Masked Nostalgia, Chic Regression: The ‘Critical’ Reconstruction<br />
of Berl<strong>in</strong>” (pp. 24–30), Sebastian Schmal<strong>in</strong>g discusses <strong>the</strong> approaches<br />
to “rebuild<strong>in</strong>g” <strong>in</strong> Berl<strong>in</strong> after World War II. He analyzes Berl<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
terms of dialectic redesign, particularly focus<strong>in</strong>g on political and social<br />
context of <strong>the</strong> adopted design approach.<br />
• In “Reconstruction Doubts: The Ironies of Build<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Sch<strong>in</strong>kel’s<br />
Name” (pp. 31–35), Barry Bergdoll discusses <strong>the</strong> reconstruction of historic<br />
build<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>the</strong> motivations of this design approach <strong>in</strong> Berl<strong>in</strong>.<br />
The article particularly refers to <strong>the</strong> demolition of <strong>the</strong> Palast der<br />
Republik and <strong>the</strong> precise reconstruction (or “re-creation”) of <strong>the</strong><br />
Berl<strong>in</strong>er Schloss at <strong>the</strong> Schlossplatz, Berl<strong>in</strong>. The author is critical of <strong>the</strong><br />
“replica” approach and expresses concerns about how <strong>the</strong> re-created<br />
city will be perceived <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> future.<br />
• “Ga<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Given: Michelangelo’s Redesign of <strong>the</strong> Campidoglio”<br />
(pp. 42–47) is an article on redesign and <strong>in</strong>sertion of new elements <strong>in</strong>to<br />
a(n) (ancient) historic environment <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> past. James Ackerman outl<strong>in</strong>es<br />
<strong>the</strong> changes made by Michelangelo dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 30-year renovation<br />
of Capitol<strong>in</strong>e Hill <strong>in</strong> Rome dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 16th century. (L.M.)<br />
Also relevant for Chapter 4: Case Studies.<br />
<strong>Historic</strong> Scotland, <strong>Architecture</strong> + Design Scotland, and <strong>the</strong> Scottish Government.<br />
2011. New Design <strong>in</strong> <strong>Historic</strong> Sett<strong>in</strong>gs. Ed<strong>in</strong>burgh: <strong>Historic</strong> Scotland. http://<br />
www.historic-scotland.gov.uk/new-design-<strong>in</strong>-historic-sett<strong>in</strong>gs.pdf<br />
This publication provides both pr<strong>in</strong>ciples and a methodology for design<strong>in</strong>g new<br />
build<strong>in</strong>gs and <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> historic environments, which, if followed, will<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>the</strong> chances of a successful and last<strong>in</strong>g result. The publication advocates<br />
that good design <strong>in</strong> historic areas must be based on a sound understand<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of <strong>the</strong> area and its components. With few exceptions, <strong>the</strong> publication does not<br />
recommend replication of exist<strong>in</strong>g build<strong>in</strong>gs; ra<strong>the</strong>r, it suggests that contemporary<br />
build<strong>in</strong>gs can be successfully <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> historic sett<strong>in</strong>gs without compromis<strong>in</strong>g<br />
design quality or historic values, and become valued heritage to<br />
future generations. Chapter 3 presents eight pr<strong>in</strong>ciples to which new developments<br />
should respond: urban structure, urban gra<strong>in</strong>, density and mix, scale,<br />
materials and detail<strong>in</strong>g, landscape, views and landmarks, and historical devel-<br />
<strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Architecture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Historic</strong> <strong>Environment</strong>: An Annotated Bibliography - Getty Conservation Institute - 2015