08.10.2015 Views

Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment

cahe_bibliography

cahe_bibliography

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

18<br />

Conservation Policy<br />

expands on <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al article 22.2 by add<strong>in</strong>g that new work “must respect and<br />

have m<strong>in</strong>imal impact on <strong>the</strong> cultural significance of <strong>the</strong> place.”<br />

The practice note provides questions and answers <strong>in</strong> relation to common issues<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> use of <strong>the</strong> article <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> assessment and design of new works <strong>in</strong> historic<br />

environments. It emphasizes that new works should respect <strong>the</strong> character of <strong>the</strong><br />

place and not overpower it. (L.M.)<br />

Conseil des monuments et des sites du Québec, ICOMOS Canada French-<br />

Speak<strong>in</strong>g Committee. 1982. Charter for <strong>the</strong> Preservation of Quebec's Heritage<br />

(Deschambault Declaration) 1982: Adopted by <strong>the</strong> Conseil des monuments et<br />

des sites du Québec, ICOMOS Canada French-Speak<strong>in</strong>g Committee, April<br />

1982. http://www.icomos.org/en/charters-and-o<strong>the</strong>r-doctr<strong>in</strong>al-texts/179-articlesen-francais/ressources/charters-and-standards/192-<strong>the</strong>-deschambault-charter<br />

This document, based on <strong>the</strong>n current <strong>in</strong>ternational preservation charters, establishes<br />

general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples for <strong>the</strong> care of Quebec’s heritage.<br />

Article V-B views <strong>the</strong> development of historic sites as positive and necessary<br />

for <strong>the</strong>ir preservation, because it can re<strong>in</strong>troduce <strong>the</strong> sites <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> community’s<br />

daily life. Article V-C declares that <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al fabric should always be preserved<br />

as much as possible and that reconstructions based on conjecture are to<br />

be avoided. Article VI-C <strong>in</strong>dicates that historic sites should always be prioritized<br />

and that <strong>in</strong>terventions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir surround<strong>in</strong>gs must be evaluated for possible<br />

adverse effects. Article VI-D adds that contemporary additions should not copy<br />

historic properties and must be harmonious with <strong>the</strong> context <strong>in</strong> terms of “tonality,<br />

texture, proportions, pattern of filled and empty spaces, and overall composition.”<br />

Article IX-A gives priority to traditional uses while respect<strong>in</strong>g those<br />

needs of <strong>the</strong> local population that require <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduction of new uses.<br />

(A.P.A.G.)<br />

English Heritage. 2008. Conservation Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples: Policies and Guidance for <strong>the</strong><br />

Susta<strong>in</strong>able Management of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Historic</strong> <strong>Environment</strong>. http://historicengland.<br />

org.uk/images-books/publications/<br />

conservation-pr<strong>in</strong>ciples-susta<strong>in</strong>able-management-historic-environment/<br />

The <strong>in</strong>tent of this document is to provide guidance for consistent decision mak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

for English Heritage staff. It was also <strong>in</strong>tended to <strong>in</strong>form o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders<br />

on how decisions regard<strong>in</strong>g heritage conservation are made by English Heritage.<br />

The approach advocated <strong>in</strong> this document is based on <strong>the</strong> def<strong>in</strong>ition of “conservation<br />

as a process of manag<strong>in</strong>g change to a significant place <strong>in</strong> its sett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

ways that will best susta<strong>in</strong> its heritage values” (p. 7). These policies were developed<br />

to be applicable to all different types of heritage places. Regard<strong>in</strong>g new<br />

works or alterations, it was recommended that all projects be subjected to an<br />

impact study focus<strong>in</strong>g on short-term and long-term effects on heritage values of<br />

<strong>the</strong> place. The document also calls for high-quality design for any new work. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> case of proposed changes or development of a site that will have a negative<br />

impact on heritage values, it should be allowed to go forward only if it is proven<br />

that <strong>the</strong>re is no o<strong>the</strong>r reasonable alternative and that <strong>the</strong> public benefits clearly<br />

outweigh <strong>the</strong> loss of heritage value. (A.P.A.G.)<br />

<strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Architecture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Historic</strong> <strong>Environment</strong>: An Annotated Bibliography - Getty Conservation Institute - 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!