Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment

cahe_bibliography cahe_bibliography

alonsorobisco
from alonsorobisco More from this publisher
08.10.2015 Views

4 Introduction to the Annotated Bibliography approval processes—used for new constructions in historic environments. Some publications simply explain how design review processes work. A number of authors analyze existing guideline tools by evaluating their successes or failures in ensuring high-quality designs that are compatible with the historic context, sometimes providing a comparative analysis of different tools already in use. Other authors question the usefulness of existing tools and propose improved or alternative approaches. Some texts focus specifically on the topic of evaluating proposals for tall buildings in historic environments. It is important to note that the authors interested in this subject, such as architects, preservationists, and urban designers, come from different backgrounds and thus provide a wide range of perspectives on the subject. 2.2: Select Design Guideline Examples The titles in this subject category provide a range of examples of design guidelines in use in several countries. An attempt was made to select guidelines with a diverse geographic spread, in recognition of the variation among local cultures and conservation approaches that influence each set of design guidelines; however, as guidelines are typically distributed and published only at the local level, the search for examples was limited by what was more widely available online. Guidelines are typically developed to help apply general conservation policies to specific projects, and they differ from policy documents in that they directly influence the built form. They may be legislative or advisory in nature. Most of the guidelines included in this bibliography have been developed or commissioned by local government agencies to guide their design review agencies’ evaluations of proposals for new constructions in historic environments or the wider urban environment. In addition, these guidelines clarify the approval criteria to developers and architects, with the intention of encouraging new building proposals that are respectful of the values and specific character of the historic environment, as well as building consensus among all parties. The degree of control over the design solution varies greatly among the different design guidelines. Guidelines can be prescriptive, with strict standards of compliance, or performance-based, which allows for a greater degree of interpretation by both the designer and the evaluator. While some favor the use of specific architectural styles, there is generally great variation in the criteria that will determine if a new building is compatible with its context. For example, some design guidelines limit their recommendations to proportions and scale, while others recommend specific building materials and colors. This variation is linked not only to the local culture but also to the scale of the geographic influence. For instance, guidelines that target a specific neighborhood tend to be more restrictive than those aimed at a larger region. Chapter 3: Design Approaches and Philosophies These texts generally attempt to address the question of how best to design in the historic environment by providing different theoretical principles, approaches, or methodologies; however, those texts prepared by conservation professionals often phrase the question differently by asking how change in the historic environment can be best accommodated. The authors in this subject category come from a variety of professions, including architecture critics, architects, preservationists, and urban planners. Several publications have been developed by government agencies Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment: An Annotated Bibliography - Getty Conservation Institute - 2015

5 Introduction to the Annotated Bibliography concerned with the quality of the built environment, such as the United Kingdom’s Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). Some texts provide a methodology for designing in historic contexts, from analysis of the historic fabric to development of a design response. Many offer an analysis of the different types of relationships created between old and new buildings. In these cases, design approaches are often categorized according to the degree to which new architecture contrasts with the historic context. Although category names vary greatly among authors, all authors agree that the opposite extremes are constituted by replication of the local historic style(s) and adoption of a contemporary architectural language that contrasts with the existing fabric. As expected, the main point of diversion among authors is usually what constitutes the most appropriate architectural response when building new in the historic environment. While most authors advocate for a balance between local building traditions and contemporary architecture, some give more emphasis to either contextual or contrasting architecture. Those authors advocating for contemporary or contrasting designs often base their arguments on the fact that they are part of the continuum of change in or the evolution of architectural styles that represent the spirit of the time. The approach advocated in a particular text is often deeply influenced by the historic moment when the publication was first produced and/or the affiliation of an author with a particular architectural style: for example, modernism or postmodernism. As in chapter 1, section 1.3, this subject category includes texts that analyze the current phenomenon of “starchitecture.” Rather than focusing on policy responses to this phenomenon, though, these texts address the topic more generally, providing a better understanding of the motivations for constructing these iconic buildings— primarily as catalysts for economic growth and urban regeneration—and how they impact the historic environment. Among the publications in this category, it is common to find some that contain portions dedicated to design guidelines and case studies; however, when the main focus of the publication is design approaches or philosophies, the texts have been placed in this category rather than elsewhere. Chapter 4: Case Studies The publications grouped here contain one or more examples of new architectural insertions in the historic context, which typically date to the 20th or 21st century. These examples include large-scale additions to historic buildings, single infill buildings, or groups of buildings, which have been either proposed or realized in a historic, and often urban, environment. Most of the publications are dedicated to presenting and analyzing these types of projects; however, some of the case studies are found in publications dedicated to a broader subject—for example, a monograph on the work of a specific architect, which includes some projects located in historic environments. The type of publication often influences how the case study is presented and to what degree the response to the historic context is discussed. Included are several titles by architects who participated in the GCI symposium “Minding the Gap: The Role of Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment,” held at the Getty Center in Los Angeles in 2013. This one-day public symposium explored the role of contemporary architecture in the historic urban environment through presentations by Thomas H. Beeby, Juergen Mayer H., Rafael Moneo, Richard Rogers, and Denise Scott Brown, as well as a discussion moderated by architecture critic Paul Goldberger. Video of the entire event can be viewed Contemporary Architecture in the Historic Environment: An Annotated Bibliography - Getty Conservation Institute - 2015

5<br />

Introduction to <strong>the</strong> Annotated Bibliography<br />

concerned with <strong>the</strong> quality of <strong>the</strong> built environment, such as <strong>the</strong> United K<strong>in</strong>gdom’s<br />

Commission for <strong>Architecture</strong> and <strong>the</strong> Built <strong>Environment</strong> (CABE).<br />

Some texts provide a methodology for design<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> historic contexts, from analysis<br />

of <strong>the</strong> historic fabric to development of a design response. Many offer an analysis<br />

of <strong>the</strong> different types of relationships created between old and new build<strong>in</strong>gs.<br />

In <strong>the</strong>se cases, design approaches are often categorized accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> degree to<br />

which new architecture contrasts with <strong>the</strong> historic context. Although category<br />

names vary greatly among authors, all authors agree that <strong>the</strong> opposite extremes are<br />

constituted by replication of <strong>the</strong> local historic style(s) and adoption of a contemporary<br />

architectural language that contrasts with <strong>the</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g fabric. As expected, <strong>the</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of diversion among authors is usually what constitutes <strong>the</strong> most appropriate<br />

architectural response when build<strong>in</strong>g new <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> historic environment. While<br />

most authors advocate for a balance between local build<strong>in</strong>g traditions and contemporary<br />

architecture, some give more emphasis to ei<strong>the</strong>r contextual or contrast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

architecture. Those authors advocat<strong>in</strong>g for contemporary or contrast<strong>in</strong>g designs<br />

often base <strong>the</strong>ir arguments on <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y are part of <strong>the</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uum of change<br />

<strong>in</strong> or <strong>the</strong> evolution of architectural styles that represent <strong>the</strong> spirit of <strong>the</strong> time. The<br />

approach advocated <strong>in</strong> a particular text is often deeply <strong>in</strong>fluenced by <strong>the</strong> historic<br />

moment when <strong>the</strong> publication was first produced and/or <strong>the</strong> affiliation of an author<br />

with a particular architectural style: for example, modernism or postmodernism.<br />

As <strong>in</strong> chapter 1, section 1.3, this subject category <strong>in</strong>cludes texts that analyze <strong>the</strong><br />

current phenomenon of “starchitecture.” Ra<strong>the</strong>r than focus<strong>in</strong>g on policy responses<br />

to this phenomenon, though, <strong>the</strong>se texts address <strong>the</strong> topic more generally, provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a better understand<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> motivations for construct<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se iconic build<strong>in</strong>gs—<br />

primarily as catalysts for economic growth and urban regeneration—and how <strong>the</strong>y<br />

impact <strong>the</strong> historic environment.<br />

Among <strong>the</strong> publications <strong>in</strong> this category, it is common to f<strong>in</strong>d some that conta<strong>in</strong><br />

portions dedicated to design guidel<strong>in</strong>es and case studies; however, when <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong><br />

focus of <strong>the</strong> publication is design approaches or philosophies, <strong>the</strong> texts have been<br />

placed <strong>in</strong> this category ra<strong>the</strong>r than elsewhere.<br />

Chapter 4: Case Studies<br />

The publications grouped here conta<strong>in</strong> one or more examples of new architectural<br />

<strong>in</strong>sertions <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> historic context, which typically date to <strong>the</strong> 20th or 21st century.<br />

These examples <strong>in</strong>clude large-scale additions to historic build<strong>in</strong>gs, s<strong>in</strong>gle <strong>in</strong>fill<br />

build<strong>in</strong>gs, or groups of build<strong>in</strong>gs, which have been ei<strong>the</strong>r proposed or realized <strong>in</strong> a<br />

historic, and often urban, environment. Most of <strong>the</strong> publications are dedicated to<br />

present<strong>in</strong>g and analyz<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se types of projects; however, some of <strong>the</strong> case studies<br />

are found <strong>in</strong> publications dedicated to a broader subject—for example, a monograph<br />

on <strong>the</strong> work of a specific architect, which <strong>in</strong>cludes some projects located <strong>in</strong><br />

historic environments. The type of publication often <strong>in</strong>fluences how <strong>the</strong> case study<br />

is presented and to what degree <strong>the</strong> response to <strong>the</strong> historic context is discussed.<br />

Included are several titles by architects who participated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> GCI symposium<br />

“M<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Gap: The Role of <strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Architecture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Historic</strong><br />

<strong>Environment</strong>,” held at <strong>the</strong> Getty Center <strong>in</strong> Los Angeles <strong>in</strong> 2013. This one-day public<br />

symposium explored <strong>the</strong> role of contemporary architecture <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> historic urban<br />

environment through presentations by Thomas H. Beeby, Juergen Mayer H., Rafael<br />

Moneo, Richard Rogers, and Denise Scott Brown, as well as a discussion moderated<br />

by architecture critic Paul Goldberger. Video of <strong>the</strong> entire event can be viewed<br />

<strong>Contemporary</strong> <strong>Architecture</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Historic</strong> <strong>Environment</strong>: An Annotated Bibliography - Getty Conservation Institute - 2015

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!