02.10.2015 Views

Disbanded Brothers – Has a ‘Feminised’ Church Alienated Men in the UK?

Disbanded Brothers - Has a 'Feminised' Church ... - Theduckers.org

Disbanded Brothers - Has a 'Feminised' Church ... - Theduckers.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.2 A Derived Def<strong>in</strong>ition of Fem<strong>in</strong>isation<br />

From <strong>the</strong>se extracts above, we can see that <strong>the</strong> allegation of fem<strong>in</strong>isation with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong><br />

has been made by many Christians, writ<strong>in</strong>g from a range of perspectives. These tend to<br />

refer generally to Western Christianity but sometimes specifically to <strong>the</strong> United States or <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>UK</strong> (or a particular denom<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>the</strong>re<strong>in</strong>). We will now attempt to formulate a work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition of fem<strong>in</strong>isation, <strong>in</strong>formed by <strong>the</strong>se quotes, and consider<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> direction, scope,<br />

form and consequence of fem<strong>in</strong>isation of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>.<br />

Direction<br />

Scope<br />

Form<br />

Consequence<br />

Fem<strong>in</strong>isation (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> context of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>) is here def<strong>in</strong>ed as:<br />

A trend towards, and usually predom<strong>in</strong>ance of, <strong>the</strong> fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e,<br />

which is expressed more frequently and more profoundly than <strong>the</strong><br />

mascul<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong><br />

a <strong>Church</strong>’s ethos, activities, symbols, values, <strong>the</strong>ology, modes of<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g and, especially, its spirituality.<br />

The logical consequence of fem<strong>in</strong>isation is its greater appeal to<br />

those who are <strong>the</strong>mselves fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Thus a fem<strong>in</strong>ised church has: (a) <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>in</strong> its fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ity, especially to <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t whereby<br />

this dom<strong>in</strong>ates over <strong>the</strong> mascul<strong>in</strong>e; (b) a more frequent and deeper appeal to <strong>the</strong> fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e,<br />

so that more often and more profoundly <strong>the</strong>re will be a fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e emphasis; (c) a range of<br />

activities, ways of be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Church</strong>, and a liturgical and l<strong>in</strong>guistic preference for fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e forms<br />

of expression, with an emphasis on characteristically fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e values and empathy with<br />

fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e spirituality; and (d) consequently attracts more fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e people.<br />

It is important to stress that, <strong>in</strong> this understand<strong>in</strong>g, fem<strong>in</strong>isation is a movement towards <strong>the</strong><br />

fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way that, say, <strong>in</strong>dustrialisation or mechanisation can be seen as<br />

processes as well as end states), and not always to <strong>the</strong> po<strong>in</strong>t of fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e dom<strong>in</strong>ance (see<br />

Figure 4).<br />

Two forms of fem<strong>in</strong>isation<br />

FIGURE 4. Movements Toward Fem<strong>in</strong>isation: from <strong>the</strong> exclusively mascul<strong>in</strong>e toward that<br />

which is shared with fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>ity and, especially, from that which is shared to that which is<br />

exclusively fem<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>e.<br />

This tentative def<strong>in</strong>ition will <strong>in</strong>form our exploration of <strong>the</strong> extent to which <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> <strong>Church</strong> has<br />

been fem<strong>in</strong>ised and what response may be appropriate. 11<br />

4.3 Aspects of Fem<strong>in</strong>isation<br />

As a result of its qualitative nature, it is difficult to prove that church culture <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>UK</strong> has<br />

become fem<strong>in</strong>ised. There is no obvious benchmark aga<strong>in</strong>st which to measure such a claim,<br />

unless we are prepared to accept Murrow’s contention that, if we understand <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> as<br />

a mechanism, it must be fem<strong>in</strong>ised s<strong>in</strong>ce it is predom<strong>in</strong>antly attended by women. Such is <strong>the</strong><br />

logic of his determ<strong>in</strong>istic claim (follow<strong>in</strong>g ‘bus<strong>in</strong>ess guru’ W. Edwards Dem<strong>in</strong>g) that “Your<br />

system is perfectly designed to give you <strong>the</strong> results you’re gett<strong>in</strong>g” (2005a, vii).<br />

In churches where some two-thirds of attendees are women, any men present will be <strong>in</strong> a<br />

m<strong>in</strong>ority. This is not a position than men are used to be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>ir workplaces, social<br />

11 Contrary to Wilson’s criticisms of Podles’ <strong>the</strong>sis regard<strong>in</strong>g fem<strong>in</strong>isation (2001b), <strong>the</strong>re is no suggestion that<br />

fem<strong>in</strong>isation is a “conspiracy <strong>the</strong>ory.”<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!