01.10.2015 Views

MACROPHOMINA PHASEOLINA ISOLATES FROM SUGAR BEET

Stojšin, V., Budakov, D - Izbis

Stojšin, V., Budakov, D - Izbis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MORPHOLOGICAL, CULTURAL AND<br />

PATHOGENIC CHARACTERISTICS OF<br />

<strong>MACROPHOMINA</strong> <strong>PHASEOLINA</strong><br />

<strong>ISOLATES</strong> <strong>FROM</strong> <strong>SUGAR</strong> <strong>BEET</strong><br />

Stojšin, V., Budakov, D., Bagi, F., Đuragin, N., Marinkov, R.<br />

Department for Environmental and Plant Protection,<br />

Faculty of Agriculture, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja<br />

Obradovida 8, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia


INTRODUCTION<br />

• Macrophomina phaseolina is a causing agent of charcoal root rot.<br />

• In our country firstly described in 1967 on sugar beet in north and<br />

central Banat.<br />

• Significant occurrence was observed in 1971 in many localities in the<br />

Vojvodina Province, and it was predominant in isolations from sugar<br />

beet in 1992, 2003 and especially in 2009 (caused damages on over<br />

50% sugar beet growing areas, estimated on app 2.5 million euro) -<br />

(Stojšin et al., 1998, 1999, 2003, 2009, 2011).<br />

• This fungus attacks sunflower, soybean, maize, rapeseed, tobacco,<br />

alfalfa, red clover, potato, peas, beans, pepper, onion, cabbage,<br />

watermelon, strawberry and many weed species.


Symptoms on sugar beet<br />

• Start with wilting and usually end in complete<br />

decay.<br />

• Severely damaged roots in dry soils can become<br />

mummified, while in moist soils rot can have a<br />

wet appearance.


Symptoms on sugar beet<br />

• Typical symptoms may appear on the crown, the central part and tip<br />

of the root.<br />

• Outer tissues become grayish brown to black with a silverish<br />

reflection.<br />

• Inner tissues turn into sponge like consistency, with colors ranging<br />

from lemon yellow and finally brownish to black.


Epidemiology<br />

• The pathogen survives in plant remains in the field as mycelia and<br />

microsclerotia-overwintering structure.<br />

• Microsclerotia may survive in the soil for many years and they are<br />

always present in sufficient amount.<br />

• Infection may occur on young roots, after which the pathogen spreads<br />

through the vascular system, while characteristic symptoms appear<br />

after plants are being stressed due to drought (Stojšin et al., 1999).<br />

Ecology<br />

• Lack of water and high soil temperatures (25-30 o C) are favorable<br />

conditions for disease development.<br />

• With more frequent growing seasons associated with high<br />

temperatures and lack of precipitation this pathogen could become<br />

predominant in the sugar beet root mycopopulation in Serbia, where<br />

beets are primarily grown without irrigation (Stojšin et al., 2011).


• The aim of this research was to separate and<br />

classify isolates of M. phaseolina on the basis<br />

of their morphological and cultural<br />

characteristics, as well as their pathogenicity<br />

on young sugar beet plants.


MATERIAL AND METHOD<br />

Collection of isolates<br />

Isolates that were used in this research were chosen from the collection comprising<br />

103 monohyphal isolates of M. phaseolina.<br />

Sixteen isolates from sugar beet grown in leading production areas in Serbia were<br />

tested, including one isolate from sunflower, soybean and maize each.<br />

No Isolate Locality Host<br />

1 ŠR 2/09 Žabalj Sugar Beet<br />

2 ŠR 3/09 Sremska Mitrovica (Glac) Sugar Beet<br />

3 ŠR 5/09 Vojka Sugar Beet<br />

4 ŠR 7/09 Šimanovci Sugar Beet<br />

5 ŠR 10/09 Boljevci Sugar Beet<br />

6 ŠR 14/09 Orlovat Sugar Beet<br />

7 ŠR 42/09 Jaša Tomid Sugar Beet<br />

8 ŠR 45(4)/09 Pančevo Sugar Beet<br />

9 ŠR 55(3)/09 Lepušnica Sugar Beet<br />

10 ŠR 62/4 Ečka Sugar Beet<br />

11 ŠR 9M/10 Ečka Sugar Beet<br />

12 ŠR24M/10 Inđija Sugar Beet<br />

13 ŠR 1/11 Beška Sugar Beet<br />

14 ŠR 15/11 Beška Sugar Beet<br />

15 ŠR 17/11 Ečka Sugar Beet<br />

16 ŠR 23/11 Rimski Šančevi Sugar Beet<br />

17 Mph Su Obtained from the Institute for Field and Vegetable Sunflower<br />

18 Mph So Crops, Novi Sad<br />

Soybean<br />

19 MphKu Maize


Cultural and morphological<br />

characteristics<br />

• Cultural characteristics were evaluated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA)<br />

and Minimal Media (MIN) using methods described by Pearson et al.<br />

(1986).<br />

• MIN was amended with chlorine by adding 0.015% of potassium<br />

chlorate.<br />

• Mycelial growth was evaluated after three days by measuring the<br />

diameter of the culture.<br />

• According to their growth patterns on MIN, isolates were divided into<br />

three groups: dense, feathery and restricted growth pattern.<br />

• The size of 100 microsclerotia was measured on all media after six<br />

days.


Pathogenicity tests<br />

• Inoculum was prepared by colonizing sorghum<br />

seed with tested M. phaseolina isolates (Omar et<br />

al., 2007).


Pathogenicity tests<br />

• Sugar beet plants at the two leaf stage were<br />

replanted in 500cm³ pots containing mixture of<br />

sterile sand and inoculum in a 3:1 ratio (v/v).<br />

• For the negative control, plants were grown in<br />

non inoculated sterile sand.


Pathogenicity tests<br />

• Plants were incubated in a growth chamber at 30°C with a<br />

photoperiod of 16h/8h light/dark and watered daily.<br />

• Symptom development on leaves was assessed daily,<br />

while final evaluation of root and hypocotyl necrosis was<br />

performed after eight days when over 50% of plants<br />

showed symptoms of irreversible wilting.


Pathogenicity tests<br />

Symptom<br />

Healthy plant 0<br />

Individual lesions on hypocotyl and root 1<br />

Merging of lesions on hypocotyl and root 2<br />

Section necrosis on hypocotyl and root 3<br />

Complete necrosis of hypocotyls and root 4<br />

Grade<br />

• Based on average pathogenicity isolates were divided into<br />

three groups:<br />

i) low pathogenic 0-1,<br />

ii) moderately pathogenic 1-2,<br />

iii) highly pathogenic 2-4.


Data analysis<br />

• Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA)<br />

using Statistica 10 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK).<br />

• Comparisons between means were made with<br />

Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at significance level of<br />

5%.


Table 3. Influence of media on mycelial growth and chlorate sensitivity of M. phaseolina<br />

Mycelial growth (mm)<br />

Isolates PDA Rank MIN+ Cl Rang Chlorate type<br />

ŠR 2/09 90,00 C 40,56 C Sensitive<br />

ŠR 3/09 90,00 C 42,33 C Sensitive<br />

ŠR 5/09 90,00 C 37,33 C Sensitive<br />

ŠR 7/09 78,00 A 22,17 B Sensitive<br />

ŠR 10/09 90,00 C 63,00 D Sensitive<br />

ŠR 14/09 90,00 C 16,50 B Sensitive<br />

ŠR 42/09 90,00 C 24,83 B Sensitive<br />

ŠR 55(3)/09 90,00 C 61,50 D Sensitive<br />

ŠR 62/4 90,00 C 24,77 B Sensitive<br />

ŠR 9M/10 90,00 C 60,33 DE Sensitive<br />

ŠR24M/10 90,00 C 0,00 A Sensitive<br />

ŠR 1/11 90,00 C 60,17 D Sensitive<br />

ŠR 15/11 90,00 C 48,17 C Sensitive<br />

ŠR 17/11 90,00 C 79,00 F Sensitive<br />

ŠR 23/11 90,00 C 45,83 C Sensitive<br />

Mph Su 80,67 B 0,00 A Sensitive<br />

Mph So 90,00 C 0,00 A Sensitive<br />

MphKu 90,00 C 18,50 B Sensitive<br />

Dense<br />

Feathery<br />

Restricted


Diameter of microsclerotia


Pathogenicity


DISCUSSION:<br />

• M. phasolina, causal agent of charcoal root rot is a plant pathogenic<br />

fungus that causes great damages in arid regions. Additionally,<br />

drought stress increases plant susceptibility to this fungus (Mayek-<br />

Perez et al., 2002).<br />

• Since M. phaseolina is highly polyphagous attacking over 500 species<br />

(Dhingra and Sinclair, 1978), variations in chlorate sensitivity,<br />

microclerotial size and formation as well as pathogenicity are not<br />

surprising (Pearson et al., 1987).<br />

• No pattern was detected in comparison of growth patterns on PDA<br />

and MIN, microsclerotia formation on both media and pathogenicity<br />

on sugar beet plants between isolates from sugar beet and other<br />

hosts. Since various authors reported that M. phaseolina isolates<br />

from different hosts can be differentiated using chlorate resistance<br />

(Pearson et al., 1986; Rayatpanah et al., 2009), this implies the need<br />

to increase the number of isolates from other hosts.


DISCUSSION:<br />

• Identifying differences in pathogenicity among isolates is the most useful<br />

tool for grouping isolates. Based on our results, isolates can be divided<br />

into 3 groups: low pathogenic – 5 isolates (26.3%), moderately and highly<br />

pathogenic – 7 isolates (36.8%) for each group.<br />

• However, there are scarce data on occurrence and significance of<br />

Macrophomina phaseolina in sugar beet, so the aim of this research was<br />

to describe cultural, morphological and pathogenic characteristics of<br />

isolates from sugar beet and compare them to isolates from other hosts<br />

(sunflower, soybean and maize).


Discussion<br />

• Preliminary studies showed that there are differences in<br />

pathogenicity of isolates from sugar beet, and even more in<br />

isolates that are from other hosts (sunflower, soybean,<br />

maize). Regarding the fact that M. phaseolina is a<br />

polyphagous and always present in the soil, and<br />

environmental factors are hard to control in sugar beet<br />

production without irrigation, one of solutions is breeding for<br />

resistance (Stojšin et al., 2012).<br />

• The described method for artificial inoculation can be used as<br />

the optimized method for pathogenicity testing of large<br />

number of isolates from Serbian sugar beet growing areas,<br />

which enables further research of M. phaseolina population<br />

as well as fast testing of sugar beet genotypes that are grown<br />

in our region.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!