29.09.2015 Views

Human Mind Luc Sala

Personality types and your brain - Club of Amsterdam

Personality types and your brain - Club of Amsterdam

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the future of the<br />

<strong>Human</strong> <strong>Mind</strong><br />

April 14, 2011<br />

<strong>Luc</strong> <strong>Sala</strong><br />

Personality types and your brain


Typology<br />

• Does our brain (or) mind fit a profile?<br />

• What profiles-typologies are there?<br />

• Does a typology describe mask or inner child?<br />

• Any proof in brain research?<br />

• Dangers of typology<br />

• Practical use


Can we frame our mind?<br />

Typology, character and persona<br />

Ir. <strong>Luc</strong> <strong>Sala</strong>


<strong>Mind</strong>, brain and soul<br />

• Is there a preferential pattern in our thinking,<br />

feeling, sensing?<br />

• How does an external signal travels from<br />

primal sensor to our conscious mind<br />

primes, archetype, feeling, emotion, image<br />

and finally thought (and vv), all filters and<br />

distortion


Perception,<br />

• Reality is perceived, constructed, personal<br />

• We sense energies, past-now-future, but very<br />

distorted, we create our own world<br />

• Thou are That<br />

Can our (personal) reality be classified, types,<br />

measured, framed and on waht level?


What do we see (in ourself or others)


Validity; a personality (framework) exist<br />

• In the sixties it was asserted that personality tests<br />

could not predict behavior with a significant<br />

correlation as attitudes and behavior were not<br />

stable, but varied with the situation. Predicting<br />

specific behavior by personality tests was then<br />

considered to be impossible, but later it was<br />

accepted that patterns of behavior by aggregating<br />

would yield some insights and that a “personality”<br />

does in fact exist.<br />

• However, in most people this is a persona or mask


Typologies<br />

• the Ayurvedic, kappa, vata, pitta<br />

• the astrological signs<br />

• Greco-Egyptian four temperaments or humours, which<br />

Galen named "sanguine", "melancholic", "choleric" and<br />

"phlegmatic"<br />

• the modern Big Five,<br />

• Jung’s 4 types<br />

• the MBTI, Myers-Briggs<br />

• the left/right hemispheric brain model,<br />

• the now discarded MacLean Triune Brain theory,<br />

• the A/B type of leader/follower<br />

• esoteric forms like the enneagram.


Big Five<br />

• "Big Five" factors (or Five Factor Model; FFM)<br />

model of personality, with five broad domains<br />

or dimensions of personality, openness<br />

(intellect), conscientiousness, extraversion,<br />

agreeableness, and neuroticism (OCEAN, or<br />

CANOE if rearranged).


Jung : 4 types of thinking x2


There is a neurological relation


Jung and Freud combined


Myers-Briggs<br />

• Dichotomies Extraversion (E) - (I) Introversion Sensing (S) - (N)<br />

Intuition Thinking (T) - (F) Feeling Judgment (J) - (P)<br />

Perception


enneagram


3 centers- 3 modes<br />

• Body-heart-mind<br />

sensing - feeling - thinking<br />

immediate - fast - slow<br />

• Extrovert-Denial-Introvert<br />

• 3 x 3 = 9 enneatypes


Enneagram 2


Overly complex


<strong>Human</strong> Design System<br />

• Alternative astrology<br />

• Makes<br />

design-personality<br />

distinction


Why<br />

• Quick scan<br />

• Mask operation works<br />

• Self-awareness<br />

• Work on the sharp point


Why not<br />

• What you is see is what you are - danger;<br />

projection<br />

• Profiling; the danger of typing<br />

• We live our image<br />

• Naming is framing<br />

• Just the mask; not for the inner child


I use it<br />

• Enneagram<br />

• Astrology (blind spots)<br />

• <strong>Human</strong> Design System<br />

• Discussion models

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!