29.09.2015 Views

BULETINUL INSTITUTULUI POLITEHNIC DIN IAŞI

buletinul institutului politehnic din iaşi - Universitatea Tehnică ...

buletinul institutului politehnic din iaşi - Universitatea Tehnică ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

96 Iulian Agape et al<br />

1. Introduction<br />

During the evolution of automotive there were elaborated different<br />

calculus models for the impact moment velocities, differing on the theoretical<br />

bases used to establish the calculus relations.<br />

In most cases, at the scene of impact are found exclusively only later<br />

produced traces, making easier to determine the post – collision speeds for the<br />

involved vehicles. Most times, the only evidence that may be related to pre –<br />

impact kinematic parameters of the vehicles are the remaining deformations<br />

resulting from impact.<br />

The most competitive calculus models, that generated already<br />

acknowledged numerical calculation programs, are based on the application of<br />

the impulse conservation principle with the consideration of the connection<br />

between energy needed to produce deformations, remaining deformation<br />

amplitude, equivalent speed and body rigidity of involved vehicles.<br />

The CRASH-3 model, well – known for the accuracy of the results,<br />

requires knowledge of remaining deformation, stiffness coefficients, and the<br />

main force of impact direction. The procedure involves dividing the<br />

deformation front in 2, 3 or 5 equal intervals of L length, purpose for<br />

establishing on the deformation front 3, 4 or 6 equidistant points, in which the<br />

remaining deformations will be determined.<br />

The evaluation of deformation values in these points is appreciated as<br />

sufficient for the average deformation determination, with an acceptable<br />

accuracy. Evidently, the increase of the number of points where the deformation<br />

is determined leads to the improvement of the method.<br />

2. The Deformation Function<br />

The algorithm requires dividing the impact zone width (L) in n equal,<br />

consecutive intervals, each with the length L/n, n∈∞ * , n finite number. For<br />

defining the deformation function it will be considered a frontal deformed<br />

vehicle and an orthogonal coordinate system will be jointly attached to this<br />

vehicle. The Ox axis of this system will be normal to the longitudinal axis of the<br />

vehicle, and the Oy axis of deformations will contain the first point of the<br />

vehicle front, starting from left (advancing way), in which the deformation is<br />

measurable.<br />

There is the possibility that, based on deformation values determination,<br />

ξ i in a number of (n+1) equidistant points distributed on the L impact zone<br />

⎛ L ⎞<br />

length, ξi<br />

= ξi⎜( i −1)<br />

n<br />

⎟, 1, ( 1)<br />

⎝ ⎠ i=<br />

n+<br />

, n∈ϒ* , n finite number, to determine an<br />

algebraic function for the deformation, with the form: f: [0, L]→ϒ; f = f(l), so

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!