New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings

SCMC-0003 SCMC-0003

alonsorobisco
from alonsorobisco More from this publisher
27.09.2015 Views

84 • smithsonian contributions to museum conservation or rubbing with a silk cloth (Steele, pers. comm.; Hendriks, pers. comm.; Hoenigswald, pers. comm.; P. Smithen, Tate, UK, personal communications). As varnish affords the surface of a painting physical protection from dirt, the long- term consequences of displaying works unvarnished need serious consideration. Glazing is a practical, but not always aesthetically desirable, solution and is in keeping with Impressionist practices (thought less desirable for modern paintings). The developments in low- reflective laminated glass technology offer a feasible compromise for the display of unvarnished paintings. CONCLUSIONS The removal of nonoriginal varnish from paintings by Van Gogh and contemporaries who valued the matte aesthetic may be desirable as part of a conservation campaign. The results of the present study highlight the changes in the grounds due to varnish and some of the practical difficulties in recovering the original appearance of the surface after varnish removal. The implications of these findings for the appearance of the recovered unvarnished painted surface present a significant challenge for the conservator. It is clear, from both conservators’ accounts and the results of the present study, that both the material composition of the work and former treatments (such as wax- resin lining) may influence the surface appearance and affect the ease of varnish removal. This study investigated the color changes imparted by varnishing and subsequent removal of varnish from prepared samples based on grounds used by Van Gogh. The results will also be relevant to the study of paintings by his contemporaries who used similar commercially prepared canvases. The problems with removing varnish from passages of paint of different composition and texture that have been noted by conservators were not investigated systematically but are clearly critical, particularly where works are to be displayed unvarnished. Acknowledgments This paper would not have been possible without the work done by Leslie Carlyle, Ella Hendriks, and Emily Nieder. The authors also thank Klaas Jan van den Berg, Ann Hoeningswald, Elizabeth Steele, Katja Lewerentz, Devi Ormond, Luuk van der Loeff, Lance Mayer, Isabelle Duvernois, Patricia Smithen, and Luuk Hoogsteder. REFERENCES Bruce- Gardner, R., G. Hedley, C. Villers.1987. Impressionist and Post- Impressionist Masterpieces: The Courtauld Collection. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Callen, A. 1994. The Unvarnished Truth: Mattness, “Primitivism” and Modernity in French Painting, c.1870–1907. The Burlington Magazine, 136(1100):738– 746. ———. 2000. The Art of Impressionism: Painting Techniques and the Making of Modernity. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press. Carlyle, L. 2005. HART Project Report. Tate Britain, London. ———. 2006. “Historically Accurate Reconstructions of Oil Painters’ Materials: An Overview of the HART Project 2002–2005.” In Reporting Highlights of the De Mayerne Programme, ed. J. J. Boon, and E. S. B. Ferreira, pp. 63–78. The Hague: Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research. Carlyle, L., J. J. Boon, R. Haswell, and M. Stols- Witlox. 2008. “Historically Accurate Ground Reconstructions for Oil Paintings.” In Preparation for Painting, ed. J. Townsend, T. Doherty, G. Heydenreich, and J. Ridge, pp.110–122. London: Archetype. Hendriks, E. 2008. Fluent Impasto in Van Gogh’s Paris Paintings (1886–1888): A Strategic Effect? Zeitschrift fur Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung, 2:221–231. Hendriks, E., and M. Geldof. 2007. Van Gogh’s Antwerp and Paris Picture Supports (1885–1888): Reconstructing Choices. Art Matters: Netherlands Technical Studies in Art, 2:39–74. Hendriks, E., and L. van Tilborgh. 2006. New Views on Van Gogh’s Development in Antwerp and Paris: An Integrated Art Historical and Technical Study of his Paintings in the Van Gogh Museum. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Jirat- Wasiutynski, M., and H. Travers Newton Jr. 1998. “Absorbent Grounds and the Matt Aesthetic in Post Impressionist Painting.” In Painting Techniques: History, Materials and Studio Practice, Preprints of the Dublin IIC Congress, ed. A. Roy and P. Smith, pp. 235–239. London: International Institute for Conservation. Miller, D. 1983. “Conservation of Neo- Impressionist Paintings.” In The Aura of Neo- Impressionists: The W. J. Holliday Collection, ed. E. W. Lee, and T. E. Smith, p. 29. Indianapolis, Indiana: Indianapolis Museum of Art. Nieder, E. 2008. The Effects of Wax- resin Lining and Varnishing on Historically Accurate Reconstructions of Van Gogh’s Grounds. Unpublished report. London: Courtauld Institute of Art, Department of Conservation and Technology. Nieder, E., E. Hendriks, and A. Burnstock. 2011. The Effects of Wax- Resin Lining and Varnishing on Historically Accurate Reconstruction of van Gogh’s Grounds. Studies in Conservation, 56(2):94–103. Peres, C. 1990. “Vincent Van Gogh’s Triptych of Trees in Blossom, Arles (1888) Part ii. On Egg White Varnishes.” In Cleaning, Retouching and Coatings: Technology and Practice for Easel Paintings and Polychrome Sculpture, Proceedings of the Brussels IIC Congress, ed. J. S. Mills and P. Smith, pp. 131–133. London: International Institute for Conservation. Schaefer, I., C. von Saint- George, and K. Lewerentz. 2009. Painting Light: The Hidden Techniques of the Impressionists. Milan: Skira editore. Swicklik, M. 1993. “French Painting and the Use of Varnish, 1750–1900.” In Conservation Research, pp. 157–174. Studies in the History of Art Monograph Series II, No. 41. Washington, D.C.: National Gallery of Art. van Bommel, M., M. Geldof, and E. Hendriks. 2005. An Investigation of Organic Red Pigments Used in Paintings by Vincent van Gogh. Art Matters: Netherlands Technical Studies in Art, 3:129–153.

Extended Abstract—Oxalate-Rich Surface Layers on Paintings: Implications for Interpretation and Cleaning Ken Sutherland, Beth Price, Andrew Lins, and Irma Passeri Ken Sutherland, Beth Price, and Andrew Lins, Conservation Department, Philadelphia Museum of Art, Box 7646, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101- 7646, USA. Irma Passeri, Conservation Department, Yale University Art Gallery, Box 208271, New Haven, Connecticut 06520- 8271, USA. Correspondence: ksutherland@philamuseum .org. Manuscript received 19 November 2010; accepted 24 August 2012. Although oxalate salts have been the subject of extensive research as alteration products on calcareous substrates (e.g. stone and fresco), there has been relatively little discussion of their occurrence on other objects, such as easel paintings. An understanding of these materials is important since they can be responsible for significant changes in the surface appearance of artworks and the solubility of the matrices in which the oxalates are formed. The altered, oxalate- rich surface layers can present substantial challenges for the visual interpretation of the painted surfaces, the accurate scientific characterization of the original materials, and the development of appropriate and effective cleaning methods. Oxalate- containing layers or deposits have been reported on a variety of noncalcareous substrates, including glass (Drewello and Weissmann, 1997; Messal et al., 1999), bronze (Alunno- Rossetti and Marabelli, 1976; Nassau et al., 1987; Mazzeo et al., 1989; Olmi et al., 1991; Matteini et al., 1991; Selwyn et al., 1996), human remains (mummy skin; Cotte et al., 2005), and polychrome wood (Arbizzani and Casellato, 2002) and easel paintings (Salvadó et al., 2002; Bracco and Ciappi, 2002:329; Matteini et al., 2002:396– 397; Sutherland et al., 2005; Spring et al., 2005; Higgitt and White, 2005; Sutherland et al., 2006; van Loon, 2008:184–186). The oxalate salts of calcium, whewellite (calcium oxalate monohydrate) and weddellite (calcium oxalate dihydrate), are those most commonly encountered on painted surfaces, although copper oxalates have also been identified in paint layers containing copper pigments (Higgitt and White, 2005:93; Castro et al., 2008). In most cases these compounds are found in deteriorated organic surface layers. Samples from a number of paintings in the collection of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, including three Italian paintings on wood panel dating from the fourteenth and sixteenth centuries, were characterized using Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy, X- ray diffraction, gas chromatography mass spectrometry, and scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy. The surface layers studied were remnants of what appeared to be colored glazes in the case of two paintings by Pontormo (circa 1494–1556/1557) and Jacopino del Conte (1510–1598) and an early varnish on a painting by Ugolino de Nerio (fourteenth century). Among the components detected in all three cases were significant levels of calcium oxalates. A degraded brown layer on Pontormo’s Portrait of Alessandro de’ Medici (1534– 1535; see Figure 1) was studied in detail, and results from the analysis of cross- section and scraping samples suggested that it consisted of remnants of an early or original pigmented glaze layer in which particulate surface dirt had become embedded. Fourier transform

Extended Abstract—Oxalate-Rich Surface<br />

Layers on <strong>Paintings</strong>: Implications<br />

for Interpretation and <strong>Cleaning</strong><br />

Ken Su<strong>the</strong>rland, Beth Price, Andrew Lins, and Irma Passeri<br />

Ken Su<strong>the</strong>rland, Beth Price, and Andrew Lins, Conservation<br />

Department, Philadelphia Museum <strong>of</strong><br />

Art, Box 7646, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101-<br />

7646, USA. Irma Passeri, Conservation Department,<br />

Yale University Art Gallery, Box 208271,<br />

<strong>New</strong> Haven, Connecticut 06520- 8271, USA.<br />

Correspondence: ksu<strong>the</strong>rland@philamuseum<br />

.org. Manuscript received 19 November 2010;<br />

accepted 24 August 2012.<br />

Although oxalate salts have been <strong>the</strong> subject <strong>of</strong> extensive research as alteration<br />

products on calcareous substrates (e.g. stone and fresco), <strong>the</strong>re has been relatively<br />

little discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir occurrence on o<strong>the</strong>r objects, such as easel paintings. An<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se materials is important since <strong>the</strong>y can be responsible for significant<br />

changes in <strong>the</strong> surface appearance <strong>of</strong> artworks and <strong>the</strong> solubility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> matrices in which<br />

<strong>the</strong> oxalates are formed. The altered, oxalate- rich surface layers can present substantial<br />

challenges for <strong>the</strong> visual interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> painted surfaces, <strong>the</strong> accurate scientific<br />

characterization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> original materials, and <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> appropriate and effective<br />

cleaning methods.<br />

Oxalate- containing layers or deposits have been reported on a variety <strong>of</strong> noncalcareous<br />

substrates, including glass (Drewello and Weissmann, 1997; Messal et al., 1999),<br />

bronze (Alunno- Rossetti and Marabelli, 1976; Nassau et al., 1987; Mazzeo et al., 1989;<br />

Olmi et al., 1991; Matteini et al., 1991; Selwyn et al., 1996), human remains (mummy<br />

skin; Cotte et al., 2005), and polychrome wood (Arbizzani and Casellato, 2002) and easel<br />

paintings (Salvadó et al., 2002; Bracco and Ciappi, 2002:329; Matteini et al., 2002:396–<br />

397; Su<strong>the</strong>rland et al., 2005; Spring et al., 2005; Higgitt and White, 2005; Su<strong>the</strong>rland et<br />

al., 2006; van Loon, 2008:184–186). The oxalate salts <strong>of</strong> calcium, whewellite (calcium<br />

oxalate monohydrate) and weddellite (calcium oxalate dihydrate), are those most commonly<br />

encountered on painted surfaces, although copper oxalates have also been identified<br />

in paint layers containing copper pigments (Higgitt and White, 2005:93; Castro et al.,<br />

2008). In most cases <strong>the</strong>se compounds are found in deteriorated organic surface layers.<br />

Samples from a number <strong>of</strong> paintings in <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Philadelphia Museum<br />

<strong>of</strong> Art, including three Italian paintings on wood panel dating from <strong>the</strong> fourteenth and<br />

sixteenth centuries, were characterized using Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy,<br />

X- ray diffraction, gas chromatography mass spectrometry, and scanning electron<br />

microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy. The surface layers studied were remnants<br />

<strong>of</strong> what appeared to be colored glazes in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> two paintings by Pontormo<br />

(circa 1494–1556/1557) and Jacopino del Conte (1510–1598) and an early varnish on a<br />

painting by Ugolino de Nerio (fourteenth century). Among <strong>the</strong> components detected in<br />

all three cases were significant levels <strong>of</strong> calcium oxalates.<br />

A degraded brown layer on Pontormo’s Portrait <strong>of</strong> Alessandro de’ Medici (1534–<br />

1535; see Figure 1) was studied in detail, and results from <strong>the</strong> analysis <strong>of</strong> cross- section and<br />

scraping samples suggested that it consisted <strong>of</strong> remnants <strong>of</strong> an early or original pigmented<br />

glaze layer in which particulate surface dirt had become embedded. Fourier transform

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!