New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings

SCMC-0003 SCMC-0003

alonsorobisco
from alonsorobisco More from this publisher
27.09.2015 Views

72 • smithsonian contributions to museum conservation FIGURE 3. Maximum or equilibrium swelling ∆A max % of paint film 16 as a function of solvent solubility parameter d, showing arbitrary classification of solvents into swelling power categories. The d values are mostly from Marcus (1999). with high values of ∂ (>22 MPa ½ ) vary significantly in their swelling action. Some of the high- ∂ solvents produce high and, in some cases, very high levels of swelling: this group of solvents generally comprises high- polarity solvents that would be immediately recognized by conservators as being very “active” on oil paint, such as benzyl alcohol, N,N- dimethyl formamide (DMF), N-methyl-2- pyrrolidone (NMP), pyridine, morpholine, and other high- polarity liquids that are sometimes referred to as “super solvents”, such as 2,2,2- trifluoroethanol. Another cluster of high- ∂ solvents (those contained within the oval in Figure 3), however, induced only low to moderate degrees of swelling: this group of solvents comprises the lower aliphatic alcohols, including cyclohexanol. One of the key outcomes of the earlier interpretations of this body of swelling data was a general descriptive vocabulary for solvents in terms of their activity on oil paint, as reflected by the DA max % values obtained for paint types 16 and 17 (Phenix, 2002b). Five broad arbitrary categories of “swelling power” were defined in terms of DA max %, as described in Table 1 and illustrated in Figure 3. Likewise, solvents were classified into five groups according to rate of swelling as reflected by their t ½ values (Table 1). Accordingly, a solvent such as acetone (paint 16: DA max % = 8.9%, t ½ = 1.25 minutes; paint 17: DA max % = 7.6%, t ½ = 3 minutes) would be classed as very fast and low- moderate in terms of swelling power; on the other hand, a solvent like benzyl Table 1. Classification of solvents by swelling power ∆A max % and rate of swelling t ½ Category Paint type 16 Paint type 17 Classification of solvents by swelling power ∆A max % Low swelling 21 Classification of solvents by rate of swelling t ½ (minutes) Very slow ≥50 ≥100 Slow 20–50 40–100 Intermediate 8–20 20–50 Fast 3–8 6–20 Very fast ≤3 ≤6 alcohol (paint 16: DA max % = 26%, t ½ = 32 minutes; paint 17: DA max % = 21%, t ½ = 60 minutes) would be classed as slow and very high swelling power.

number 3 • 73 Another key finding of this work was that the groups of solvents consisting of aliphatic alcohols (methanol, ethanol, propan- 1- ol, etc.), aliphatic acyclic ketones (acetone, butanone, etc.), and the lower aliphatic esters (n- butyl acetate, ethyl propanoate, etc.) generally fell within the class of low- moderate swelling power. Since these solvents are common staples for practical varnish removal, this finding should be somewhat reassuring to most practitioners who rely heavily on these solvents. By the same token, it must be recognized that oil paint may still be very sensitive to solvents that fall into the low- moderate swelling category and possibly even some of those in the low swelling group. The initial interpretation of the swelling data obtained on paints 16 and 17 (Phenix, 2002b) consciously avoided using the Teas chart because of the now well- established, intrinsic theoretical shortcomings of the Teas fractional solubility parameter system (Phenix, 1998). Plotting the complete set of swelling results (DA max % values) obtained for paint 16 in pure solvents and solvent mixtures, categorized as in Table 1, highlights some of the difficulties with this mode of graphic representation. It becomes apparent immediately that the area of special sensitivity of oil paints to solvents is appreciably more complex than the single zone of high swelling suggested by Hedley (1980). Solvents capable of causing significant degrees of swelling, for example, those having DA max values of 12% or greater for paint 16 (high- moderate, high, and very high swellers), are spread over a large part of the Teas chart, covering a broad range of polarities, extending from the aromatic hydrocarbons and apolar mixtures of ethanol and white spirit through the chlorinated solvents (Teas fractional dispersion force parameter (f d ) values of ~60–70) to the strongly dipolar solvents such as the amides and cellosolves (f d values of ~40–50). The areas of low and low- moderate swelling (DA max < 12%) correspond mostly to the aliphatic hydrocarbons, aliphatic acyclic ethers, aliphatic alcohols, aliphatic acyclic ketones, and some of the esters (Figure 4). Rather than the single zone of highly active solvents represented by the Hedley- Stolow peak swelling region, it can be seen now that high and very high swelling solvents and solvent mixtures lie in several zones across the Teas chart. One of the more significant observations on the results as a whole, when presented using the Teas fractional solubility parameter diagram, is that scattered between and very close to the zones corresponding to high- moderate, high, and very high swelling pure solvents and solvent mixtures, there are several solvents that cause just lowmoderate swelling on the paint film tested. These isolated regions of low- moderate swelling arise from the fact that the aliphatic acyclic ketones and the aliphatic acyclic esters populate the central area of the active part of the Teas chart, between about f d = 48 and 65, yet the aliphatic acyclic ketones and esters are just low- moderate swellers compared to the high- or high- moderate swelling solvents all around. This anomaly reflects some of the limitations of the Teas fractional solubility parameter chart: solvents from families with quite different solubility properties, for example, ketones and amides, are clustered close together in similar regions of the chart. Solvents having similar Teas solubility parameters can have very different swelling powers: compare, for example, acetone (f d = 47, f p = 32, f h = 21; DA max ≈ 9%) with N- methyl- 2- pyrrolidone (f d = 48, f p = 32, f h = 20; DA max ≈ 30%). Irregularities such as this, which become even more evident when considering mixtures of solvents, illustrate the limitations of the Teas fractional solubility parameter diagram as a reliable map for safer cleaning practice, to the extent that in the eyes of some “this system is not an adequate tool for restorers” (Zumbühl, FIGURE 4. Teas solubility diagram, showing for paint type 16, zones corresponding to different degrees of maximum swelling: pure solvents and solvent mixtures.

number 3 • 73<br />

Ano<strong>the</strong>r key finding <strong>of</strong> this work was that <strong>the</strong> groups <strong>of</strong><br />

solvents consisting <strong>of</strong> aliphatic alcohols (methanol, ethanol,<br />

propan- 1- ol, etc.), aliphatic acyclic ketones (acetone, butanone,<br />

etc.), and <strong>the</strong> lower aliphatic esters (n- butyl acetate, ethyl propanoate,<br />

etc.) generally fell within <strong>the</strong> class <strong>of</strong> low- moderate<br />

swelling power. Since <strong>the</strong>se solvents are common staples for practical<br />

varnish removal, this finding should be somewhat reassuring<br />

to most practitioners who rely heavily on <strong>the</strong>se solvents. By <strong>the</strong><br />

same token, it must be recognized that oil paint may still be very<br />

sensitive to solvents that fall <strong>into</strong> <strong>the</strong> low- moderate swelling category<br />

and possibly even some <strong>of</strong> those in <strong>the</strong> low swelling group.<br />

The initial interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> swelling data obtained on<br />

paints 16 and 17 (Phenix, 2002b) consciously avoided using <strong>the</strong><br />

Teas chart because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> now well- established, intrinsic <strong>the</strong>oretical<br />

shortcomings <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Teas fractional solubility parameter<br />

system (Phenix, 1998). Plotting <strong>the</strong> complete set <strong>of</strong> swelling results<br />

(DA max<br />

% values) obtained for paint 16 in pure solvents<br />

and solvent mixtures, categorized as in Table 1, highlights some<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> difficulties with this mode <strong>of</strong> graphic representation. It<br />

becomes apparent immediately that <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> special sensitivity<br />

<strong>of</strong> oil paints to solvents is appreciably more complex than<br />

<strong>the</strong> single zone <strong>of</strong> high swelling suggested by Hedley (1980).<br />

Solvents capable <strong>of</strong> causing significant degrees <strong>of</strong> swelling, for<br />

example, those having DA max<br />

values <strong>of</strong> 12% or greater for paint<br />

16 (high- moderate, high, and very high swellers), are spread over<br />

a large part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Teas chart, covering a broad range <strong>of</strong> polarities,<br />

extending from <strong>the</strong> aromatic hydrocarbons and apolar mixtures<br />

<strong>of</strong> ethanol and white spirit through <strong>the</strong> chlorinated solvents<br />

(Teas fractional dispersion force parameter (f d<br />

) values <strong>of</strong> ~60–70)<br />

to <strong>the</strong> strongly dipolar solvents such as <strong>the</strong> amides and cellosolves<br />

(f d<br />

values <strong>of</strong> ~40–50). The areas <strong>of</strong> low and low- moderate<br />

swelling (DA max<br />

< 12%) correspond mostly to <strong>the</strong> aliphatic hydrocarbons,<br />

aliphatic acyclic e<strong>the</strong>rs, aliphatic alcohols, aliphatic<br />

acyclic ketones, and some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> esters (Figure 4).<br />

Ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> single zone <strong>of</strong> highly active solvents represented<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Hedley- Stolow peak swelling region, it can be seen<br />

now that high and very high swelling solvents and solvent mixtures<br />

lie in several zones across <strong>the</strong> Teas chart. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more<br />

significant observations on <strong>the</strong> results as a whole, when presented<br />

using <strong>the</strong> Teas fractional solubility parameter diagram, is<br />

that scattered between and very close to <strong>the</strong> zones corresponding<br />

to high- moderate, high, and very high swelling pure solvents and<br />

solvent mixtures, <strong>the</strong>re are several solvents that cause just lowmoderate<br />

swelling on <strong>the</strong> paint film tested. These isolated regions<br />

<strong>of</strong> low- moderate swelling arise from <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong> aliphatic<br />

acyclic ketones and <strong>the</strong> aliphatic acyclic esters populate <strong>the</strong> central<br />

area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> active part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Teas chart, between about f d<br />

=<br />

48 and 65, yet <strong>the</strong> aliphatic acyclic ketones and esters are just<br />

low- moderate swellers compared to <strong>the</strong> high- or high- moderate<br />

swelling solvents all around. This anomaly reflects some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Teas fractional solubility parameter chart:<br />

solvents from families with quite different solubility properties,<br />

for example, ketones and amides, are clustered close toge<strong>the</strong>r in<br />

similar regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> chart. Solvents having similar Teas solubility<br />

parameters can have very different swelling powers: compare,<br />

for example, acetone (f d<br />

= 47, f p<br />

= 32, f h<br />

= 21; DA max<br />

≈ 9%) with<br />

N- methyl- 2- pyrrolidone (f d<br />

= 48, f p<br />

= 32, f h<br />

= 20; DA max<br />

≈ 30%).<br />

Irregularities such as this, which become even more evident when<br />

considering mixtures <strong>of</strong> solvents, illustrate <strong>the</strong> limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Teas fractional solubility parameter diagram as a reliable map<br />

for safer cleaning practice, to <strong>the</strong> extent that in <strong>the</strong> eyes <strong>of</strong> some<br />

“this system is not an adequate tool for restorers” (Zumbühl,<br />

FIGURE 4. Teas solubility diagram, showing for paint type<br />

16, zones corresponding to different degrees <strong>of</strong> maximum<br />

swelling: pure solvents and solvent mixtures.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!