New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings
SCMC-0003 SCMC-0003
Extended Abstract—Residues on Unvarnished Surfaces after Absorene Sponge Dry Cleaning Shawn Digney- Peer and Julie Arslanoglu INTRODUCTION The accumulation of surface dirt, most commonly deposited through airborne pollutants, is a concern that affects all paintings that are not displayed or stored in glazed and sealed microclimates. A common conservation treatment involves the removal of this deposit, which alters the aesthetic quality of a work of art by shifting contrast and color values of the paint film (Eastaugh, 1990). Surface cleaning is usually straightforward for paintings that have intact varnish layers, as the coatings protect the paint films and may facilitate the removal of dirt layers. However, removing surface grime from unvarnished artwork is often problematic as unvarnished paint films are frequently sensitive to solvent and aqueous cleaning methods (Perry, 1990; Mills et al., 2008; Ormsby and Learner, 2009). In such instances it is common to attempt dry cleaning techniques, although these also pose risks. Unvarnished paintings may be damaged by mechanical action produced by the manipulation of the cleaning material against the paint surface. Damage may involve abrasion, changes in gloss, dislodgement of pigment from underbound paint, or even future changes resulting from the aging of residues deposited by the cleaning material (Paerlstein et al., 1982; Estabrook, 1989; Sterlini, 1995; Brokerhof et al., 2002; van den Berg et al., 2008). This study examines the potential for residue deposition from Absorene sponges when they are used for dry surface cleaning. Shawn Digney-Peer, Sherman Fairchild Paintings Conservation Center, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1000 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, 10028-0198, USA. Julie Arslanoglu, Department of Scientific Research, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1000 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York, 10028- 0198, USA. Correspondence: Shawn Digney- Peer, shawn.digney- peer@met museum.org.; Julie Arslanoglu, julie.arslanoglu@met museum.org. Manuscript received 19 November 2010; accepted 24 August 2012. EXPERIMENT Absorene Dry Cleaning Soot Sponges (as opposed to Absorene Paper and Book Cleaner, which is a different material) are commercial natural rubber sponges that were selected for this study because of their frequent use on unvarnished modern and contemporary paintings. These paintings often incorporate materials such as raw canvas, exposed ground, paint, and paper. Initial characterization of the sponge using attenuated total reflectance–Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR- FTIR) showed that the spectrum of the bulk material is consistent with that of natural rubber, with the addition of calcium carbonate. When the sponge was compressed and then released in the FTIR diamond cell holder, a residue was deposited on the diamond surface as the sponge contracted (Figure 1).
- Page 189: number 3 • 177 Acknowledgments Th
- Page 192 and 193: 180 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 194 and 195: 182 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 197 and 198: Effects of Commercial Soaps on Unva
- Page 199 and 200: number 3 • 187 The aqueous and or
- Page 201 and 202: number 3 • 189 all tests. The res
- Page 203 and 204: number 3 • 191 palmitic and stear
- Page 205 and 206: FIGURE 5. Scanning electron microsc
- Page 207 and 208: number 3 • 195 FIGURE 6. Confocal
- Page 209 and 210: Extended Abstract—Tissue Gel Comp
- Page 211: number 3 • 199 • The capillary
- Page 214 and 215: 202 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 217 and 218: Extended Abstract—Use of Agar Cyc
- Page 219: number 3 • 207 FIGURE 4. The FTIR
- Page 222 and 223: 210 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 224 and 225: 212 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 226 and 227: 214 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 228 and 229: 216 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 230 and 231: 218 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 233 and 234: Extended Abstract—The Schlürfer:
- Page 235 and 236: number 3 • 223 FIGURE 3. Removal
- Page 237 and 238: Extended Abstract—Surface Cleanin
- Page 239: number 3 • 227 Table 3. Cleaning
- Page 243 and 244: number 3 • 231 FIGURE 3. The effe
- Page 245 and 246: Extended Abstract—The Use of Ioni
- Page 247: number 3 • 235 ethanol mixtures w
- Page 250 and 251: 238 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 252 and 253: 240 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 254 and 255: 242 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 256: equirements for smithsonian series
Extended Abstract—Residues on Unvarnished<br />
Surfaces after Absorene Sponge Dry <strong>Cleaning</strong><br />
Shawn Digney- Peer and Julie Arslanoglu<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The accumulation <strong>of</strong> surface dirt, most commonly deposited through airborne pollutants,<br />
is a concern that affects all paintings that are not displayed or stored in glazed<br />
and sealed microclimates. A common conservation treatment involves <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> this<br />
deposit, which alters <strong>the</strong> aes<strong>the</strong>tic quality <strong>of</strong> a work <strong>of</strong> art by shifting contrast and color<br />
values <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> paint film (Eastaugh, 1990).<br />
Surface cleaning is usually straightforward for paintings that have intact varnish<br />
layers, as <strong>the</strong> coatings protect <strong>the</strong> paint films and may facilitate <strong>the</strong> removal <strong>of</strong> dirt layers.<br />
However, removing surface grime from unvarnished artwork is <strong>of</strong>ten problematic as<br />
unvarnished paint films are frequently sensitive to solvent and aqueous cleaning methods<br />
(Perry, 1990; Mills et al., 2008; Ormsby and Learner, 2009). In such instances it is common<br />
to attempt dry cleaning techniques, although <strong>the</strong>se also pose risks. Unvarnished<br />
paintings may be damaged by mechanical action produced by <strong>the</strong> manipulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
cleaning material against <strong>the</strong> paint surface. Damage may involve abrasion, changes in<br />
gloss, dislodgement <strong>of</strong> pigment from underbound paint, or even future changes resulting<br />
from <strong>the</strong> aging <strong>of</strong> residues deposited by <strong>the</strong> cleaning material (Paerlstein et al., 1982;<br />
Estabrook, 1989; Sterlini, 1995; Brokerh<strong>of</strong> et al., 2002; van den Berg et al., 2008). This<br />
study examines <strong>the</strong> potential for residue deposition from Absorene sponges when <strong>the</strong>y<br />
are used for dry surface cleaning.<br />
Shawn Digney-Peer, Sherman Fairchild <strong>Paintings</strong><br />
Conservation Center, The Metropolitan Museum<br />
<strong>of</strong> Art, 1000 Fifth Avenue, <strong>New</strong> York, <strong>New</strong> York,<br />
10028-0198, USA. Julie Arslanoglu, Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Scientific Research, The Metropolitan<br />
Museum <strong>of</strong> Art, 1000 Fifth Avenue, <strong>New</strong> York,<br />
<strong>New</strong> York, 10028- 0198, USA. Correspondence:<br />
Shawn Digney- Peer, shawn.digney- peer@met<br />
museum.org.; Julie Arslanoglu, julie.arslanoglu@met<br />
museum.org. Manuscript received 19 November<br />
2010; accepted 24 August 2012.<br />
EXPERIMENT<br />
Absorene Dry <strong>Cleaning</strong> Soot Sponges (as opposed to Absorene Paper and Book<br />
Cleaner, which is a different material) are commercial natural rubber sponges that were<br />
selected for this study because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir frequent use on unvarnished modern and contemporary<br />
paintings. These paintings <strong>of</strong>ten incorporate materials such as raw canvas,<br />
exposed ground, paint, and paper.<br />
Initial characterization <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sponge using attenuated total reflectance–Fourier<br />
transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR- FTIR) showed that <strong>the</strong> spectrum <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bulk material<br />
is consistent with that <strong>of</strong> natural rubber, with <strong>the</strong> addition <strong>of</strong> calcium carbonate.<br />
When <strong>the</strong> sponge was compressed and <strong>the</strong>n released in <strong>the</strong> FTIR diamond cell holder,<br />
a residue was deposited on <strong>the</strong> diamond surface as <strong>the</strong> sponge contracted (Figure 1).