Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Extended Abstract—Use <strong>of</strong> Agar<br />
Cyclododecane for <strong>Cleaning</strong> Tests<br />
on a Frail Painting<br />
Alberto Finozzi, Alessandra Sella, and Chiara Stefani<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
The painting representing <strong>the</strong> Battle <strong>of</strong> San Martino (24 June 1859), also known as<br />
<strong>the</strong> battle <strong>of</strong> Solferino and San Martino, probably done on cotton textile by an anonymous<br />
author, was carried out with an unusual technique, i.e., using a monochrome sketch<br />
painted with a slight tonal range (Figure 1). The preparation layer, <strong>the</strong> priming, and <strong>the</strong><br />
actual painting are in animal glue tempera, and <strong>the</strong> execution technique is poor and not<br />
cohesive, as confirmed by <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> analysis carried out by Stefano Volpin and<br />
discussed subsequently.<br />
Large areas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> painting were water stained, probably because <strong>of</strong> its original<br />
outdoor location. The cleaning intervention served to remove <strong>the</strong> incoherent dirt from<br />
<strong>the</strong> surface and to resolve <strong>the</strong> moisture staining problem. Different tests with different<br />
materials and methodologies were carried out.<br />
CLEANING PROCEDURE<br />
Alberto Finozzi, Alessandra Sella, and Chiara<br />
Stefani, Restauro Studio, Via Mazzini 43, Schio,<br />
Vicenza, Italy. Correspondence: Alberto Finozzi,<br />
albert<strong>of</strong>inozzi@libero.it; Alessandra Sella, alessandra73_4@libero.it;<br />
Chiara Stefani, chiara_stefani_4@libero.it.<br />
Manuscript received 19 November<br />
2010; accepted 24 August 2012.<br />
The first approach to <strong>the</strong> cleaning was difficult. Every intervention based on aqueous<br />
methods resulted in moisture absorption by <strong>the</strong> surface and <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> a new<br />
water stain where <strong>the</strong> product was applied. Subsequently, laser cleaning was tested unsuccessfully.<br />
Next, different kinds <strong>of</strong> erasers (kneaded, s<strong>of</strong>t, and stiff erasers) were used,<br />
and agar gels were also tested. These were applied with different methodologies, such as<br />
(1) pregelatinized agar brushed on small areas (Campani et al., 2007), (2) agar as a stiff<br />
gel applied for a few minutes to have <strong>the</strong> lowest level <strong>of</strong> water, (3) preliminary saturation<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface with an alcohol and water mixture airbrushed on <strong>the</strong> surface prior to<br />
<strong>the</strong> agar application to prevent moisture stains, (4) preliminary saturation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface<br />
with cyclododecane at different concentrations applied by brush followed with <strong>the</strong> agar<br />
application, and (5) agar reinforced with carboxymethylcellulose to “s<strong>of</strong>ten” <strong>the</strong> material<br />
and to adapt it to <strong>the</strong> painting surface. The most interesting result was obtained<br />
using a preliminary application <strong>of</strong> cyclododecane (60% cyclododecane, 40% petroleum<br />
e<strong>the</strong>r [80°–120°C fraction] w/v) to stop water diffusion <strong>into</strong> <strong>the</strong> surface, thus preventing<br />
moisture stains, followed by a brush application <strong>of</strong> pregelatinized agar (Hangleiter and<br />
Saltzmann, 2008).