New Insights into the Cleaning of Paintings
SCMC-0003 SCMC-0003
Effects of Commercial Soaps on Unvarnished Painted Surfaces: A Pilot Study for Their Assessment Andrés Sánchez- Ledesma, Carmen Muro- García, and María Dolores Gayo- García Abstract. The elimination of soiling from painted surfaces, especially for recent unvarnished paintings, by means of alkaline soaps with a high pH poses a significant risk to the objects. The wide range of objects that can be treated with these products and their long- standing presence on the specialist market have led to this pilot study to evaluate the existence of residues and/or damage from them on painted surfaces. The methodology applied involves the use of analytical techniques such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, polarized light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy- dispersive X- ray spectroscopy, and confocal scanning microscopy. This study presents the results from the use of Vulpex soap at low concentrations in an aqueous solution, in white spirit, and in fluid hydroxypropyl cellulose gels, applied directly on the unvarnished painting or on barrier paper and rigid agar gels. A reduction in the amount of residues was observed when soap was used in a 1% concentration in white spirit or as a gel. All the aqueous treatments caused surface damage, especially cracking, flattening, and particle removal and accumulation. The damage may be associated with both the application method and the rinsing process. Some treatments have been tested by a team of professional restorers, and a good correspondence was found with the results from the test samples. The main difference between restorers appears to depend on the area of the painting that was treated. INTRODUCTION Andrés Sánchez-Ledesma, Museo Thyssen Bornemisza, Paseo del Prado 8, 28014 Madrid, Spain. Carmen Muro-García, Museo Nacional Centro de Arte Reina Sofía, Calle Santa Isabel 52, 28012 Madrid, Spain. María Dolores Gayo- García, Museo Nacional del Prado, Calle Ruiz de Alarcón 23, 28014 Madrid, Spain. Correspondence: Andrés Sánchez- Ledesma, asanchezledesma@artelab.es; Carmen Muro- García, carmen.muro@ mcu.es; María Dolores Gayo- García, dolores. gayo@museodelprado.es. Manuscript received 19 November 2010; accepted 24 August 2012. The wide range of pictorial techniques and finishes employed in paintings held at the Museo Thyssen- Bornemisza, Museo Nacional Reina Sofía, and Museo Nacional del Prado has prompted the need for a far- reaching study of commercial products recommended for the cleaning of paintings and sculptures. This project received the support of several companies specializing in the distribution of restoration materials, which will later publish the results from this pilot study. Because of the large number of restorers who will have access to the results of these studies through these companies, the project also included products that are not in widespread use in museum cleaning protocols but that may present a high risk for restoration processes in general. The first aim of the project was to develop an analysis methodology that allowed assessment of potential damaging effects on the pictorial surface by the commercial products and to monitor the residues after cleaning. Within the Spanish market there are several recommended commercial cleaning products, including alkaline soaps, resin soaps, and products formed by a complex mixture of surfactants and other additives, such as Vulpex, resin soap 1194, resin soap 1295, Contrad 2000, and “concentrado aniónico.”
- Page 145 and 146: number 3 • 133 FIGURE 10. Stress-
- Page 147 and 148: Extended Abstract—A Preliminary S
- Page 149: number 3 • 137 Acknowledgments An
- Page 152 and 153: 140 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 154 and 155: 142 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 156 and 157: 144 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 159 and 160: Cleaning of Acrylic Emulsion Paints
- Page 161 and 162: number 3 • 149 advocates of publi
- Page 163 and 164: number 3 • 151 2.5, 3.5, 4.5, 5.5
- Page 165 and 166: number 3 • 153 ethoxylate units i
- Page 167 and 168: number 3 • 155 FIGURE 5. Golden A
- Page 169: number 3 • 157 alien und Methoden
- Page 172 and 173: 160 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 174 and 175: 162 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 176 and 177: 164 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 178 and 179: 166 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 181 and 182: Extended Abstract—The Removal of
- Page 183 and 184: number 3 • 171 RESULTS AND DISCUS
- Page 185 and 186: number 3 • 173 FIGURE 3. The SEM
- Page 187 and 188: Extended Abstract—Cleaning Issues
- Page 189: number 3 • 177 Acknowledgments Th
- Page 192 and 193: 180 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 194 and 195: 182 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 198 and 199: 186 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 200 and 201: 188 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 202 and 203: 190 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 204 and 205: 192 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 206 and 207: 194 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 208 and 209: 196 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 210 and 211: 198 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 213 and 214: Extended Abstract—Partially Hydro
- Page 215: number 3 • 203 Thus far, gels wit
- Page 218 and 219: 206 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 221 and 222: Dry Cleaning Approaches for Unvarni
- Page 223 and 224: number 3 • 211 Table 1. (Continue
- Page 225 and 226: number 3 • 213 Table 3. Average d
- Page 227 and 228: number 3 • 215 FIGURE 2. Cadmium
- Page 229 and 230: number 3 • 217 FIGURE 7. Test per
- Page 231: number 3 • 219 Morrison, R., A. B
- Page 234 and 235: 222 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 236 and 237: 224 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 238 and 239: 226 • smithsonian contributions t
- Page 241 and 242: Extended Abstract—Residues on Unv
- Page 243 and 244: number 3 • 231 FIGURE 3. The effe
- Page 245 and 246: Extended Abstract—The Use of Ioni
Effects <strong>of</strong> Commercial Soaps<br />
on Unvarnished Painted Surfaces:<br />
A Pilot Study for Their Assessment<br />
Andrés Sánchez- Ledesma, Carmen Muro- García,<br />
and María Dolores Gayo- García<br />
Abstract. The elimination <strong>of</strong> soiling from painted surfaces, especially for recent unvarnished<br />
paintings, by means <strong>of</strong> alkaline soaps with a high pH poses a significant risk to <strong>the</strong> objects. The<br />
wide range <strong>of</strong> objects that can be treated with <strong>the</strong>se products and <strong>the</strong>ir long- standing presence on<br />
<strong>the</strong> specialist market have led to this pilot study to evaluate <strong>the</strong> existence <strong>of</strong> residues and/or damage<br />
from <strong>the</strong>m on painted surfaces. The methodology applied involves <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> analytical techniques<br />
such as gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, polarized<br />
light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and energy- dispersive X- ray spectroscopy, and<br />
confocal scanning microscopy. This study presents <strong>the</strong> results from <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong> Vulpex soap at low<br />
concentrations in an aqueous solution, in white spirit, and in fluid hydroxypropyl cellulose gels, applied<br />
directly on <strong>the</strong> unvarnished painting or on barrier paper and rigid agar gels. A reduction in <strong>the</strong><br />
amount <strong>of</strong> residues was observed when soap was used in a 1% concentration in white spirit or as a<br />
gel. All <strong>the</strong> aqueous treatments caused surface damage, especially cracking, flattening, and particle<br />
removal and accumulation. The damage may be associated with both <strong>the</strong> application method and<br />
<strong>the</strong> rinsing process. Some treatments have been tested by a team <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>essional restorers, and a<br />
good correspondence was found with <strong>the</strong> results from <strong>the</strong> test samples. The main difference between<br />
restorers appears to depend on <strong>the</strong> area <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> painting that was treated.<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
Andrés Sánchez-Ledesma, Museo Thyssen Bornemisza,<br />
Paseo del Prado 8, 28014 Madrid, Spain.<br />
Carmen Muro-García, Museo Nacional Centro<br />
de Arte Reina S<strong>of</strong>ía, Calle Santa Isabel 52, 28012<br />
Madrid, Spain. María Dolores Gayo- García,<br />
Museo Nacional del Prado, Calle Ruiz de Alarcón<br />
23, 28014 Madrid, Spain. Correspondence: Andrés<br />
Sánchez- Ledesma, asanchezledesma@artelab.es;<br />
Carmen Muro- García, carmen.muro@<br />
mcu.es; María Dolores Gayo- García, dolores.<br />
gayo@museodelprado.es. Manuscript received 19<br />
November 2010; accepted 24 August 2012.<br />
The wide range <strong>of</strong> pictorial techniques and finishes employed in paintings held at<br />
<strong>the</strong> Museo Thyssen- Bornemisza, Museo Nacional Reina S<strong>of</strong>ía, and Museo Nacional del<br />
Prado has prompted <strong>the</strong> need for a far- reaching study <strong>of</strong> commercial products recommended<br />
for <strong>the</strong> cleaning <strong>of</strong> paintings and sculptures. This project received <strong>the</strong> support<br />
<strong>of</strong> several companies specializing in <strong>the</strong> distribution <strong>of</strong> restoration materials, which will<br />
later publish <strong>the</strong> results from this pilot study. Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> restorers<br />
who will have access to <strong>the</strong> results <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se studies through <strong>the</strong>se companies, <strong>the</strong> project<br />
also included products that are not in widespread use in museum cleaning protocols but<br />
that may present a high risk for restoration processes in general.<br />
The first aim <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> project was to develop an analysis methodology that allowed<br />
assessment <strong>of</strong> potential damaging effects on <strong>the</strong> pictorial surface by <strong>the</strong> commercial products<br />
and to monitor <strong>the</strong> residues after cleaning. Within <strong>the</strong> Spanish market <strong>the</strong>re are several<br />
recommended commercial cleaning products, including alkaline soaps, resin soaps,<br />
and products formed by a complex mixture <strong>of</strong> surfactants and o<strong>the</strong>r additives, such as<br />
Vulpex, resin soap 1194, resin soap 1295, Contrad 2000, and “concentrado aniónico.”