ana translation

INTRODUCTION
xli
when we note that in these verses the Harklensian writes t
$ ,
we are bound to infer that in each case he refers to the word
present in the text of the prior Version, and that he prefixes # to
note the absence of the word so marked from his Greek exemplar.
A more conspicuous instance an absolutely conclusive one is the
IQJOSJ # (= KoAao-ews) of 2 Pet. ii. 4 (Harkl.) ;
and to it are to
be added, lodlj * (= ovo-av)* of 2 Pet. ii. 13 ; the Ol^aj # (= avror,
after SiSa^) of 2 Joh. 9 ;
the O1AO # (
= Trao-^s, before -rijs e^A^o-ia?)
be in like manner
of 3 Joh. 6.
Many other words with # may
accounted for, as Gl^D # (= Trao-cu/, after o-TrovSryi/),
2 Pet. i.
5;
Ol-^> (
= O.VTOV, after oi/o/xaros), 3 Joh. 7 ;
but in these cases there
exists Greek authority for the marked words, to which the asterisk
may possibly refer.
2. The marginal notes also of the Harklensian (which in Section x, d
(p. xxxvii supr.) have been used as evidence of affinity
between the
Versions in diction) yield in a few places evidence to like effect, of
affinity in text. Thus, the ^.uJSAsZ (= upe^crTai), given
in the
Harklensian margin as alternative for the wjpOjZ (= Kara KO.TJCT era i) of
its text, points
to our Version as its source. And so in other instances,
as the ^-\^