ana translation

JUDE 15-23]
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTES. 135
scribe's grammatical correction ;
the true reading of Philox., with its
irregularity, is no doubt that which the two oldest copies preserve.
Harkl. corrects it in the opposite way, by writing the former verb
as well as the latter in the infinitive (,*">SV?S). Notably,
it is the
habit of Harkl. to render Gr. infin. by infin. ;
Philox. tends to substitute
(where admissible) the fut. with j prefix.
1 6. Here Philox. once more, in rendering /ze/xi/a^cxpoi, offers a fairly
adequate periphrasis (see note on Gr. text in loc.) Harkl., :
forsaking
the guidance of the prior version, is misled by a reading (else unknown)
which he records on his inarg., ^^i^vpot into an attempt to
render the word etymologically (as
if = /xc/x^o/jtevoi /xvptaSa),* --^,V
IZoo^. White renders " conquerentes de principatu" but the Gr. of
Harkl. marg. implies ]ZoS> (
= /xvpias, as ver. 14), not (Zo29 (
= /u,eya-
Awo-uV*/, as ver. 25).
Ib. For |Au> i'l..
( = v7T6poyKa), see note (p. 17), and first Note supr.,
on (MJQ.I, 2 Pet. ii. 18. The form here used is the Syro-Hexaplar
rendering of the same Gr. word, Thren. i. 9, also (as cited by Masius,
Syr. PecuL, s.v.),
Deut. xxx. 11.
20. Neither version attempts to express the superlative ayiajTu'-n;,
both render merely as if
dym, which no Gr. gives, were read here.
22. For .OO1TV)\O (= KCU ovs (AW), 10 and 20 (and Arab, similarly)
read .OOllSDO ; representing KCU TO i/xanov avrw (sc.,
the e'
The noun (JJlD is sometimes written without (, and its,
use = f/xartov is frequent in Pesh. (In tlje footnote in loc., p. 37, the
reading of 10 is wrongly given as tOOlQlSC-lO.)
22, 23. To the notes (p.
82 supr.) on the complicated variations
in the text of these verses, the following remarks are supplementary.
(a) Philox. here, against Harkl. and the other versions, and the Gr.
manuscripts, supports the form in which the passage is cited by a
writer so early and so learned as Clement of Alexandria (ors /xev
e/c
c, Sia/cpao/xeVous Se cA-eetre (Strom, vi. 8) and by Jerome
* For an example of the etymological skill of Harkl., see his note on Act. x. 1,
where he explains KopvyXios as = Kop))v r)\iov: also (assuming the later Syr.
version of Apoc. to be his) his rendering of eV /ieV ovpavn/^an, as if it were
written, eV /u.eVy oupa.i' at'uarj (or TOS) (Apoc. viii. 13).